Skip to content

· Private foundation

Corduroy Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$835
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$305
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$33kEnvironment$14kHealth$6kAnimals$3kArts & Culture$2kCivil Rights$1kInternational$870Science & Tech$850Other$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$30
Median grant
7
States reached
$7k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NATURE CONSERVANCY OF VA$305
UCLA FOUNDATION$100
ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION$40
UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS$30
GREEN AMERICA$30
NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY$30
VPM MEDIA CORP$30
ASPCA$30
UVA HEALTH FOUNDATION$30
NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL$30
FINCA INTERNATIONAL INC$30
ATCHAFALAYA BASINKEEPER$30
WORLD WILDLIFE FUND$30
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$30
OCEAN CONSERVANCY$30
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 66% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION: $510 → 10%SIERRA CLUB: $328 → 10%NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL: $950 → 17%AYUDA PUERTO RICO: $400 → 28%WORLD WILDLIFE FUND: $550 → 14%MERCY CORP: $400 → 12%NATURE CONSERVANCY: $1k → 7%WCVE: $200 → 7%SPECIAL LOVE INC: $300 → 7%THE FRONT PORCH: $700 → 8%FIGHT LIKE A GRRL: $560 → 13%UVA HEALTH FOUNDATION: $1k → 22%ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION: $300 → 10%SIERRA CLUB: $219 → 10%NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL: $875 → 17%WORLD WILDLIFE FUND: $350 → 14%NATURE CONSERVANCY: $1k → 7%WCVE: $200 → 7%SPECIAL LOVE INC: $200 → 7%MIMA: $200 → 8%FIGHT LIKE A GRRL: $520 → 13%UVA HEALTH FOUNDATION: $1k → 22%ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION: $240 → 10%NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL: $800 → 17%WORLD WILDLIFE FUND: $250 → 14%NATURE CONSERVANCY: $500 → 7%WCVE: $200 → 7%SPECIAL LOVE INC: $200 → 7%CHARLOTTESVILLE ALBEMARLE SPCA: $350 → 8%UVA HEALTH FOUNDATION: $1k → 22%NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL: $600 → 17%WORLD WILDLIFE FUND: $200 → 14%NATURE CONSERVANCY: $500 → 7%VPM MEDIA CORP: $200 → 7%UVA HEALTH FOUNDATION: $500 → 22%NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL: $500 → 17%WORLD WILDLIFE FUND: $200 → 14%UVA HEALTH FOUNDATION: $500 → 22%NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL: $200 → 17%UVA HEALTH FOUNDATION: $200 → 22%UVA HEALTH FOUNDATION: $200 → 22%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $210 → 17%WORLD FOOD KITCHEN: $200 → 14%NATURE CONSERVANCY OF VA: $305 → 8%OCEAN CONSERVANCY: $600 → 14%NATURE CONSERVANCY OF VA: $200 → 8%ASPCA: $200 → 17%OCEAN CONSERVANCY: $270 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
NY
MA
OR
CA
NE
VA
DC
LA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$24k · 20 repeat orgs$2k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +31% since the first grant, against -4% for those funded once.

20 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
9

Total granted

$24k
$2k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
-4%

Still filing today

80%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentInternationalAnimalsHealthEducationPublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $4k · revenue +41%
  • WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $2k · revenue +62%
  • NA
    NATIONAL ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION
    8× · 2018–2025 · $1k · revenue +128%

Funded once

  • TF
    THE FRONT PORCH
    one grant, 2019 · $700
  • AP
    Ayuda Puerto Rico Inc
    one grant, 2017 · $400
  • MC
    MERCY CORP
    one grant, 2019 · $400
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
2
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
3
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
4
The International Dark-Sky Association Inc

Darksky international restores the nighttime environment and protects communities from the harmful effects of light pollution through outreach, advocacy, and conservation.

—
5
Rainforest Alliance Inc

RA works at the intersection of business, agriculture & forests to improve lives & protect nature by transforming how land is used, production of goods & consumer choices.

—
6
Earth & Space Research

Increase societal understanding of the earth system through scientific research and education.

Science & Tech
7
Environment Now
—
8
Climate Institute

The climate institute is organized for the purpose of educating the general public and policy makers as to the gravity of potential climate change, exploring the policy implications of the latest scientific findings on climate modelling…

Environment
9
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
10
National Association of Clean Water Agencies

Nacwa is the national voice of public clean water utilities, shaping water policy, convening a vibrant peer network, and empowering water leaders.

—
11
Waterkeeper Alliance Inc

To protect our right to clean water in communities around the world.

Environment
12
American Humane Association

Founded in 1877, american humane association, dba american humane society (american humane) is committed to ensuring the safety, welfare and well-being of animals. our leadership programs are first to serve in promoting and nurturing the…

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc; the most unlike its peers is Louisa County Rescue Squad Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/22
Grantees still filing
14/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UCLA FOUNDATION: $33,400 · EducationUCLA FOUNDATION+2 more: $375 · EducationUVA HEALTH FOUNDATION: $4,530 · OtherUVA HEALTH FOUNDATIONTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $3,000 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCYFIGHT LIKE A GRRL: $1,080 · OtherFIGHT LIKE A GRRLSIERRA CLUB: $925 · OtherSIERRA CLUBWCVE: $850 · OtherWCVETHE FRONT PORCH: $700 · OtherTHE FRONT PORCHNATURE CONSERVANCY OF VA: $505 · Other+4 more: $750 · Other+4 moreNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $4,205 · EnvironmentNATURAL RESOURCES D…WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $1,980 · EnvironmentWORLD WILDLIFE FUND…NATIONAL ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION: $1,370 · EnvironmentNATIONAL ARBOR DAY …NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY INC: $1,355 · EnvironmentNATIONAL AUDUBON SO…OCEAN CONSERVANCY: $1,250 · EnvironmentOCEAN CONSERVANCY+1 more: $330 · EnvironmentALBEMARLE SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS INC: $1,100 · AnimalsTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $480 · AnimalsGREEN AMERICA: $180 · AnimalsTHE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC: $750 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $540 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $200 · InternationalFINCA INTERNATIONAL INC: $130 · InternationalSPECIAL LOVE INC: $1,230 · HealthLouisa County Rescue Squad Inc: $100 · HealthVPM MEDIA CORPORATION: $480 · Arts & CultureAyuda Puerto Rico Inc: $400 · Public Safety & Disaster
Education$33,775Other$12,340Environment$10,490Animals$1,760International$1,620Health$1,330Arts & Culture$480Public Safety & Disaster$400

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUCLA FOUNDATION: $33,400 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $4,205 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $3,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $1,980 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION: $1,370 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY INC: $1,355 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetOCEAN CONSERVANCY: $1,250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL LOVE INC: $1,230 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetALBEMARLE SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS INC: $1,100 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSIERRA CLUB: $925 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC: $750 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $540 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $480 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetVPM MEDIA CORPORATION: $480 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAyuda Puerto Rico Inc: $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetATCHAFALAYA BASINKEEPER INC: $330 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSTU-COMM INC: $275 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREEN AMERICA: $180 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFINCA INTERNATIONAL INC: $130 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC SOCIETY: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLouisa County Rescue Squad Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UCLA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds OCEAN CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL LOVE INC ↗
  • Who funds ALBEMARLE SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS INC ↗
  • Who funds SIERRA CLUB ↗
  • Who funds THE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds VPM MEDIA CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds Ayuda Puerto Rico Inc ↗
  • Who funds ATCHAFALAYA BASINKEEPER INC ↗
  • Who funds STU-COMM INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds GREEN AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds FINCA INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds Louisa County Rescue Squad Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC9.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Corduroy Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Corduroy Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Corduroy Charitable Trust?

    Find your warmest path to Corduroy Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Corduroy’s filings →

    More from the funding graph