Skip to content

Montana · Private foundation

Cordingley Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$41k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
7
Grants FY2025
16
Organizations funded FY2024
31%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$5,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$15,000
Organizations funded a year
9 to 16
FY2018 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
1
Total assets, FY2025
$524k
Applications
Takes unsolicited applications
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 31% of the organizations Cordingley Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 8% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthArts & CultureEnvironmentHuman ServicesCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving7$41k43%
FY202416$45k31%
FY202314$47k36%
FY202214$39k29%
FY202113$43k54%
FY20209$42k33%
FY201911$27k36%
FY201810$31k50%
91% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$167kArts & Culture$71kHealth$27kFood & Nutrition$19kYouth Development$18kEnvironment$16kHuman Services$6kRecreation & Sports$3kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Helena Education Foundation$108,50097%
Inseparable Inc$20,00021%
Helena Food Share Inc$18,75070%
The University of Montana Foundation$17,00040%
Montana Free Press$12,00040%
Montana Conservation Voters Education Fund$8,00021%
Prickly Pear Land Trust$7,00040%
Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association$2,50010%
Department of Public Health & Human Services$1,5001n/a
Holter Museum of Art$1,00020%
Show all 20 grantees
All grantees of Cordingley Foundation by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Helena Education Foundation$108,50097%
Inseparable Inc$20,00021%
Helena Food Share Inc$18,75070%
The University of Montana Foundation$17,00040%
Montana Free Press$12,00040%
Montana Conservation Voters Education Fund$8,00021%
Prickly Pear Land Trust$7,00040%
Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association$2,50010%
Department of Public Health & Human Services$1,5001n/a
Holter Museum of Art$1,00020%
American Jobs for Americas Youth Montana$1,00010%
Great Falls Clinic Legacy Foundation$1,00010%
The Myrna Loy$1,00020%
Kids Chance of Montana$1,0001n/a
Upper Seven Law$1,00010%
Red Ants Pants Foundation$1,00010%
Bridgercare$50010%
Paris Gibson Square Inc$50010%
Lewis & Clark Library Foundation$50010%
Lewis & Clark Literacy Council$50011%

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 23 recipients with no EIN on record ($141k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Cordingley Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHelena Education Foundation: $108,500 over 9y, 6.8% of budgetInseparable Inc: $20,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetHelena Food Share Inc: $18,750 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetThe University of Montana Foundation: $17,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMontana Free Press: $12,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetMontana Conservation Voters Education Fund: $8,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetPrickly Pear Land Trust: $7,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetAircraft Owners & Pilots Association: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHolter Museum of Art: $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Jobs for Americas Youth Montana: $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetGreat Falls Clinic Legacy Foundation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetThe Myrna Loy: $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUpper Seven Law: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRed Ants Pants Foundation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBridgercare: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetParis Gibson Square Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLewis & Clark Library Foundation: $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetLewis & Clark Literacy Council: $500 over 1y, 1.3% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 18.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Montana Community Foundation IncMT27.8× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Montana Community Foundation Inc · Treacy Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Dennis & Phyllis Washington Foundation · M J Murdock Charitable Trust · Annie E Casey Foundation Inc · Speyer Family Foundation · The High Stakes Foundation · Town Pump Charitable Foundation · The Arthur M Blank Family Foundation · Mainwaring Family Foundation · Helena Area Community Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Cordingley Foundation with peer funders

About Cordingley Foundation

How much does Cordingley Foundation give?
Cordingley Foundation reported 7 grants totaling $41,000 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 9 and 16 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.
What does Cordingley Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Education (48%), Arts & Culture (21%), Health (8%).
Who are Cordingley Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: Helena Education Foundation ($109k), Inseparable Inc ($20k), Helena Food Share Inc ($19k).
Does Cordingley Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 31% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Cordingley Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.
Which funders back the same organizations as Cordingley Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Montana Community Foundation Inc, Treacy Foundation, First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc.
Where is Cordingley Foundation based?
Cordingley Foundation is based in MT.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Cordingley’s filings →

More from the funding graph