· Private foundation
Cordingley Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k5 grants · $16k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $25k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Helena Education Foundation | $15,000 |
| Grandstreet Theatre | $10,000 |
| Univ Of MT School of Journalism | $5,500 |
| Big Brothers Big Sisters | $5,000 |
| Univ of MT Davidson Honors College | $2,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,000 |
| Upper 7 Law | $1,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 14% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +87% since the first grant, against +25% for the ones you funded once.
18 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HEHELENA EDUCATION FOUNDATION9× · 2017–2025 · $109k · revenue +103%
- IIInseparable Inc2× · 2020–2021 · $20k · revenue +389%
- HFHELENA FOOD SHARE INC7× · 2017–2024 · $19k · revenue +87%
Funded once
- SCShodair Childrens Hospitalone grant, 2023 · $5k
- UOUNIVERSITY OF MONTANAone grant, 2017 · $3k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2021 · $3k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To collectively serve as a catalyst for engagement and bonding of people to our wildlife and public lands in montana through a sense of place, education, access, research and stewardship.
To create and sustain an optimal business climate, business prosperity and a strong montana economy through advocacy, education and collaboration, working to provide an empowered and educated workforce, reduce business growth obstacles,…
The mission of the montana land reliance (mlr) is to partner with landowners to provide permanent protection for private lands that are significant for agricultural production, fish and wildlife habitat, and open space.
The montana state parks foundation raises private support to enhance the visitors experience and build advocates for montanas state parks and recreation heritage.
To promote public policy solutions that provide increased access to economic opportunities, greater individual freedoms and encourage greater participation in public matters by providing research and recommendation on public policy
Humanities Montana serves communities through stories and conversation. We offer experiences that nurture imagination and ideas by speaking to Montanans diverse history, literature, and philosophy.
The Pulp is dedicated to publishing accurate and relevant news and information that informs and engages the people of Missoula and western Montana. Through our journalism we aim to promote discourse, foster civic engagement and create…
Montana hospital association is the principal advocate for the interests of members in their efforts to improve the health status of the communities they serve.
Promotion and development of montana's construction industry.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The University of Montana Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HELENA EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Inseparable Inc ↗
- Who funds HELENA FOOD SHARE INC ↗
- Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MONTANA FREE PRESS ↗
- Who funds MONTANA CONSERVATION VOTERS EDUCATION FUND ↗
- Who funds PRICKLY PEAR LAND TRUST ↗
- Who funds AIRCRAFT OWNERS & PILOTS ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds KIDS CHANCE OF MONTANA ↗
- Who funds GREAT FALLS CLINIC LEGACY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UPPER SEVEN LAW ↗
- Who funds RED ANTS PANTS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds American Jobs for Americas Youth Montana ↗
- Who funds THE MYRNA LOY ↗
- Who funds HOLTER MUSEUM OF ART ↗
- Who funds LEWIS & CLARK LIBRARY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BRIDGERCARE ↗
- Who funds LEWIS & CLARK LITERACY COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds PARIS GIBSON SQUARE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Montana Community Foundation Inc · Treacy Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Dennis & Phyllis Washington Foundation · M J Murdock Charitable Trust · Annie E Casey Foundation Inc · Speyer Family Foundation · The High Stakes Foundation · Town Pump Charitable Foundation · The Arthur M Blank Family Foundation · Mainwaring Family Foundation · Helena Area Community Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Cordingley Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.