Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Conyes Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$42k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$13k
Largest
01What you fund
0192% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Arts & Culture$79kReligion$57kHealth$29kCommunity Improvement$25kFood & Nutrition$19kEducation$15kHuman Services$12kRecreation & Sports$4kOther$0
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $7k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $35k
$1,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$580k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Glenbrook Underground$12,500
Lake Tahoe Community Presbyterian$12,000
Thunderbird Lodge Preservation Society$10,000
Lake Tahoe Community College Foundation$2,000
Christmas Cheer Food Drive(Raleys)$1,500
Safeway Great Food Drive$1,500
Holy Names High School$1,000
Food Bank of No Nevada$1,000
Tahoe Magic$300
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–19, $600) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Live Violence Free: $300 → 8%Live Violence Free: $300 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
NV
NJ
CA
MD
AZ
KS
TN
NC
DC
OK
AL
GA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$263k · 50 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +36% since the first grant, against +4% for the ones you funded once.

50 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 41 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

50
13

Total granted

$263k
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
+4%

Still filing today

48%
46%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthArts & CultureEducationReligionHuman ServicesEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TL
    THUNDERBIRD LODGE PRESERVATION SOCIETY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $59k · revenue +49%
  • GU
    GLENBROOK UNDERGROUND INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $25k · revenue +23%
  • EF
    EPILEPSY FOUNDATION OF AMERICA
    6× · 2017–2022 · $6k · revenue +1%

Funded once

  • CV
    Carson Valley Medical Center Foundation
    one grant, 2021 · $3k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $2k
  • TB
    THE BAR X PROJECT INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $1k · revenue +26%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
2
The Translational Genomics Research Institute

Please see schedule o

Health
3
Doheny Eye Institute

To further the conservation, improvement and restoration of human eyesight" (mrs. doheny - 1947).

4
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
5
The Heart Foundation

The heart foundation (thf) was created to save lives from heart disease by increasing awareness, educating the public, and supporting innovative research at smidt heart institute at cedars-sinai medical center in los angeles, california.…

Philanthropy
6
Critical Path Institute

The critical path institute is a catalyst in the development of new approaches that advance medical innovation and regulatory science. this is achieved by leading teams that share data, knowledge and expertise resulting in sound, consensus…

Health
7
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
8
Sutter Bay Hospitals

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
9
Brightfocus Foundation

Brightfocus foundation funds exceptional research worldwide to defeat alzheimer's disease, macular degeneration, and glaucoma and provides expert information on these heartbreaking diseases. please refer to schedule o for a complete…

Health
10
Sutter Bay Medical Foundation

Mission statement: mission: caring for our patients first and our people always. vision: to be the most comprehensive, integrated and connected health system for getting and staying well. values: excellence - we deliver high-quality,…

Health
11
Children's Hospital & Research Center At Oakland

The mission of children's hospital & research center at oakland is to protect and advance the health and well-being of children through clinical care, teaching and research.

Health
12
Lehigh Valley Hospital

Our mission is to heal, comfort and care for the people of our community by providing advanced and compassionate health care of superior quality and value, supported by education and research.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Thunderbird Lodge Preservation Society and the most unlike its peers is William G Fiss Memorial Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity Arts OrganizationsLand Conservation Organizat…Public University Foundatio…Public School District Foun…Veteran Support ServicesCommunity Health CentersYouth Sports Booster Organi…Domestic Violence Crisis Se…Affordable Housing Developm…Child Abuse Advocacy Servic…Government Accountability R…Urban Agriculture & Food Ac…Christian Missionary Organi…Cancer Support Organizations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 41 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%10%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%7%10–20yr16%23%20–35yr13%30%35–55yr16%30%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%19%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%12%10–20yr16%49%20–35yr13%6%35–55yr16%13%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 10% of your grantees by number, and just 19% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 6% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
6%
2/36
the rest of the field
13%
240,394/1,819,529

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 63 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
30/33
Grantees still filing
23/33
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Lake Tahoe Community Presbyterian — $53,000 · OtherLake Tahoe Community PresbyterianFood Bank of No Nevada — $7,600 · OtherFood Bank of No NevadaIndividual grant recipient — $7,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientChristmas Cheer Food Drive(Raleys) — $7,500 · OtherChristmas Cheer Food Drive(Raleys)InTouch — $6,800 · OtherSalvation Army — $4,800 · Other+36 more — $50,802 · Other+36 moreTHUNDERBIRD LODGE PRESERVATION SOCIETY — $59,000 · Arts & CultureTHUNDERBIRD LODGE PRESERVATION …GLENBROOK HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC — $14,300 · Arts & CultureGLENBROOK HISTORICAL SOCIETY IN…+2 more — $2,300 · Arts & CultureGLENBROOK UNDERGROUND INC — $25,000 · Community ImprovementGLENBROOK …CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION — $9,500 · HealthEPILEPSY FOUNDATION OF AMERICA — $6,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $700 · Health+6 more — $2,325 · HealthLAKE TAHOE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $5,500 · EducationTAHOE MAGIC INC — $2,800 · EducationPIEDMONT EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $1,000 · EducationINSIGHT FOR LIVING — $2,500 · ReligionLEAGUE TO SAVE LAKE TAHOE — $1,800 · ReligionThru The Bible Inc — $600 · ReligionTHE GREENHOUSE PROJECT — $1,600 · Environment
Other$138,002Arts & Culture$75,600Community Improvement$25,000Health$18,525Education$9,300Religion$4,900Environment$1,600

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10k$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHUNDERBIRD LODGE PRESERVATION SOCIETY — $59,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetGLENBROOK UNDERGROUND INC — $25,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetGLENBROOK HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC — $14,300 over 6y, 5.4% of budgetCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION — $9,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetEPILEPSY FOUNDATION OF AMERICA — $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLAKE TAHOE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $5,500 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetWilliam G Fiss Memorial Foundation — $3,700 over 7y, 66% of budgetFREE THE KIDS INC — $3,200 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTAHOE MAGIC INC — $2,800 over 8y, 1.6% of budgetINSIGHT FOR LIVING — $2,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCHANNEL 5 PUBLIC BROADCASTING INC — $2,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLEAGUE TO SAVE LAKE TAHOE — $1,800 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GREENHOUSE PROJECT — $1,600 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetSan Francisco CASA — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BAR X PROJECT INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetPIEDMONT EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSt Joseph Community Land Trust — $700 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $700 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $600 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetVISTA RISE COLLECTIVE — $600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC — $600 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $600 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetThru The Bible Inc — $600 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $400 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetReno Rodeo Foundation — $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY — $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetKQED INC — $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRenown Health Foundation — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTANFORD HEALTH CARE — $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THUNDERBIRD LODGE PRESERVATION SOCIETY
  • Who funds GLENBROOK UNDERGROUND INC
  • Who funds GLENBROOK HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds EPILEPSY FOUNDATION OF AMERICA
  • Who funds LAKE TAHOE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds William G Fiss Memorial Foundation
  • Who funds FREE THE KIDS INC
  • Who funds TAHOE MAGIC INC
  • Who funds INSIGHT FOR LIVING
  • Who funds CHANNEL 5 PUBLIC BROADCASTING INC
  • Who funds LEAGUE TO SAVE LAKE TAHOE
  • Who funds THE GREENHOUSE PROJECT
  • Who funds San Francisco CASA
  • Who funds THE BAR X PROJECT INC
  • Who funds TRAILS AT THE LAKE
  • Who funds PIEDMONT EDUCATION FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Special Olympics Nevada
  • Who funds St Joseph Community Land Trust
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds VISTA RISE COLLECTIVE

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Tahoe Community FoundationNV21.7× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Tahoe Community Foundation · The E L Cord Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · NV Energy Charitable Foundation · Community Foundation of Northern Nevada · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · United Way Worldwide · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Conyes Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 22%
  • Epilepsy Foundation of America22% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 63 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph