· Private foundation
Contegra Cares
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2022–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k43 grants · $53k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $91k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MISSOURI VETERANS ENDEAVOR | $45,000 |
| NORTHPOINT FOUNDATION INC | $16,600 |
| PEDAL THE CAUSE | $16,072 |
| CARITAS FAMILY SOLUTIONS | $13,444 |
| METRO EAST HUMANE SOCIETY | $5,500 |
| SONGS4SOLDIERS | $4,000 |
| OUR LITTLE HAVEN | $3,950 |
| THE BACKSTOPPERS INC | $3,370 |
| RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF ST LOUIS | $3,258 |
| SIUE FOUNDATION | $2,842 |
| NATIONAL MS SOCIETY | $2,500 |
| EDWARDSVILLE ROTARY CLUB | $2,400 |
| BLUES FOR KIDS | $2,100 |
| CAMP HOPE | $1,500 |
| THE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE SOUTHWESTERN MADISON COUNTY | $1,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $137k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
22 repeat relationships — 22 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 25 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 56% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $63k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CSCHRISTIAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF ILLINOIS3× · 2022–2024 · $69k · revenue +27%
- PTPEDAL THE CAUSE2× · 2023–2024 · $19k · revenue +33%
- BABOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF ST CHARLES COUNTY2× · 2023–2024 · $2k · revenue +6%
Funded once
- PRPINK RIBBON GOODone grant, 2023 · $3k
- PPELOTONIAgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $2k · revenue +33%
- AMALTON MEMORIAL HEALTH SERVICES FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $1k · revenue +512%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Through our exceptional health care services, we reveal the health presence of god.
We are dedicated to providing exceptional care to every patient, every time.
Impacting the lives of hospitalized children and their families by raising funds and awareness equally benefiting our member hospitals, st. louis children's hospital and ssm health cardinal glennon children's hospital. funds are used for…
To provide care to our community and to serve as a major teaching hospital for education and training in medicine, dentistry, nursing, and allied health professions.
We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.
Assistance to police officers and their families.
Through our exceptional health care services, we reveal the healing presence of god.
Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.
The st. louis integrated health network, through partnership and collaboration, is a healthcare intermediary building capacity across sectors to improve wellbeing by increasing access to health and social services.
To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ronald Mcdonald House Charities of St Louis and the most unlike its peers is Greater Kansas City Mo Usbc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 24. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 59 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CHRISTIAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF ILLINOIS ↗
- Who funds CAMP HOPE INC ↗
- Who funds MISSOURI VETERANS ENDEAVOR ↗
- Who funds NORTHPOINT FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds PEDAL THE CAUSE ↗
- Who funds METRO EAST HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds OUR LITTLE HAVEN ↗
- Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF ST LOUIS ↗
- Who funds THE BACKSTOPPERS INC FKA POLICEMEN & FIREMEN FUND OF ST LOUIS ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF ST CHARLES COUNTY ↗
- Who funds BLUES FOR KIDS ↗
- Who funds PELOTONIA ↗
- Who funds ST LOUIS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WENTZVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT BLUE ↗
- Who funds The Chamber of Commerce SW Madison ↗
- Who funds THE RESTORE NETWORK ↗
- Who funds ALTON MEMORIAL HEALTH SERVICES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COLLINSVILLE AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds HIGHLAND AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN ILLINOIS BUILDERS ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds REVITY CREDIT UNION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: St Louis Community Foundation Inc · Edward Jones Foundation · World Wide Technology Foundation · Enterprise Bank & Trust Foundation · Moneta Group Charitable Foundation · United Way of Greater St Louis Inc · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Contegra Cares funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Contegra Cares?
Find your warmest path to Contegra Cares through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.