Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Concord Hospital Trust

Concord Hospital Trust serves as the philanthropic arm of Concord Hospital, securing and distributing charitable gifts in accordance with donors' intent to support the Hospital's mission of meeting the health needs of individuals within the communities it serves.

$5.9M
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$5.5M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Health$52MHuman Services$277kHousing & Shelter$20kArts & Culture$5kYouth Development$4k
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 10 grants below total $5,782,568 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $5,949,471 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $166,903 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $66k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $197k
  • $250k+1 grant · $5.5M
$15,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$71M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Concord Hospital$5,506,013
Concord Regional VNA (aka Granite VNA)$107,500
Concord Hospital - Laconia$89,379
Riverbend Community Mental Health Inc$15,676
Archways$15,000
Concord School District$15,000
The Grapevine Family & Community Resource Center$10,500
Waypoint$10,000
Family Promise of Greater Concord Inc$7,500
Merrimack Valley Day Care Service$6,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $188k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 5%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 5%Child & Family Services of New Hampshire: $15k → 7%Archways: $15k → 7%The Grapevine Family & Community Resource Center: $11k → 7%Archways: $10k → 7%The Grapevine Family & Community Resource Center: $10k → 7%The Grapevine Family & Community Resource Center: $10k → 7%The Grapevine Family & Community Resource Center: $10k → 7%The Grapevine Family & Community Resource Center: $10k → 7%The Grapevine Family & Community Resource Center: $10k → 7%The Grapevine Family & Community Resource Center: $8k → 7%Community Bridges: $10k → 7%Northeast Deaf & Hard of Hearing: $8k → 7%Northeast Deaf & Hard of Hearing: $8k → 7%Northeast Deaf & Hard of Hearing: $8k → 7%Family Promise of Greater Concord Inc: $8k → 7%Northeast Deaf & Hard of Hearing: $7k → 7%Northeast Deaf & Hard of Hearing: $6k → 7%Northeast Deaf & Hard of Hearing: $6k → 7%Family Promise of Greater Concord: $5k → 7%Family Promise of Greater Concord: $5k → 7%Family Promise of Greater Concord: $5k → 7%Family Promise of Greater Concord: $5k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$52M · 12 repeat orgs$111k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +41% since the first grant, against +4% for the ones you funded once.

12 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
7

Total granted

$52M
$111k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+4%

Still filing today

83%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    Concord Hospital Inc
    8× · 2017–2024 · $47M · revenue +41%
  • GV
    Granite VNA Inc
    7× · 2017–2024 · $160k · revenue +20%
  • TG
    THE GRAPEVINE FAMILY AND COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER
    7× · 2018–2024 · $68k · revenue +155%

Funded once

  • CH
    Concord Hospital - Franklin
    one grant, 2023 · $55k · revenue +6%
  • CH
    CONCORD HOSPITAL ASSOCIATES
    one grant, 2017 · $20k
  • CB
    Community Bridges Inc
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue -8%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Concord Counseling Services

Providing mental health, alcohol, and drug addiction treatment services to the residents of Franklin county as well as educational material and prevention services.

Health
2
Central New Hampshire Vna & Hospice

Promoting dignity, independence and well-being through the delivery of quality home health, hospice and community-based care services.

—
3
Cumberland Medical Center

Cumberland Medical Center provides quality healthcare, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health, regardless of the patient's ability to pay.

Health
4
Concord Christian Academy

Concord Christian Academy is a life preparatory educational institution that works in harmony with families to promote the spiritual, intellectual, emotional, physical and creative growth of students, empowering them to live for the glory…

Education
5
Monadnock Community Hospital

Monadnock Community Hospital is committed to improving the health and well-being of our community. We will elevate the health of our community by providing accessible, high quality and value based care.

Health
6
New Hampshire Children's Health Foundation
Health
7
Concord Hospital Trust

Concord Hospital Trust serves as the philanthropic arm of Concord Hospital, securing and distributing charitable gifts in accordance with donors' intent to support the Hospital's mission of meeting the health needs of individuals within…

Health
8
Home Health and Hospice Care

Home Health and Hospice Care provides trusted patient centered services that enhance each individual's independence and quality throughout life.

Health
9
Concord Area Trust for Community Housing

Catch's mission is to strengthen our communities by creating opportunities for permanently affordable, quality housing for people otherwise not being served.

Housing & Shelter
10
Dartmouth Health Home Care Inc

We are dedicated to delivering outstanding home health and hospice services that enrich the lives of the people we serve.

—
11
Upper Valley Comm Health Services Inc

UVCHS in a not for profit organization that provides medical dental behavioral heath and pharmacy services. Our goal is to make quality care available to everyone regardless of demographic or economic status. We accept all major insurances…

Health
12
Covenant HomeCare

Covenant HomeCare provides quality healthcare, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health, regardless of the patient's ability to pay.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Concord Hospital Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Grapevine Family and Community Resource Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/18
Grantees still filing
13/18
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Concord Hospital Inc — $47,483,443 · HealthConcord Hospital IncConcord Hospital - Laconia — $3,742,211 · HealthConcord Hospital - Laconia+3 more — $224,648 · HealthTHE GRAPEVINE FAMILY AND COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER — $68,000 · Human ServicesWAYPOINT — $65,000 · Human ServicesNORTHEAST DEAF & HARD OF HEARING SERVICES INC — $42,500 · Human ServicesFAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER CONCORD INC — $27,500 · Human ServicesARCHWAYS — $25,000 · Human ServicesCommunity Bridges Inc — $10,000 · Human ServicesConcord School District — $93,500 · OtherRIVERBEND COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH — $43,676 · OtherCHILDREN'S PLACE AND PARENT EDUCATION CENTER — $40,000 · OtherMerrimack Valley Day Care Service — $27,000 · OtherCONCORD HOSPITAL ASSOCIATES — $20,000 · OtherYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF CONCORD NH — $8,000 · Other+1 more — $3,500 · OtherCONCORD COMMUNITY MUSIC SCHOOL — $5,000 · Arts & Culture
Health$51,450,302Human Services$238,000Other$235,676Arts & Culture$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetConcord Hospital Inc — $47,483,443 over 8y, 2.0% of budgetConcord Hospital - Laconia — $3,742,211 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetGranite VNA Inc — $160,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetTHE GRAPEVINE FAMILY AND COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER — $68,000 over 7y, 3.7% of budgetWAYPOINT — $65,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetConcord Hospital - Franklin — $54,648 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRIVERBEND COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH — $43,676 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNORTHEAST DEAF & HARD OF HEARING SERVICES INC — $42,500 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetCHILDREN'S PLACE AND PARENT EDUCATION CENTER — $40,000 over 4y, 11% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER CONCORD INC — $27,500 over 5y, 2.5% of budgetMerrimack Valley Day Care Service — $27,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetARCHWAYS — $25,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetCommunity Bridges Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW HAMPSHIRE CHILDREN'S TRUST INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF CONCORD NH — $8,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCONCORD COMMUNITY MUSIC SCHOOL — $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE FRIENDS PROGRAM INC — $3,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

New Hampshire Charita…Madelaine G Vonweber …Granite United WayMerrimack County Savi…Trust Uw Oleonda Jame…Bank of New Hampshire…Eastern Bank Foundati…Cogswell Benevolent T…Bangor Savings Bank F…Lincoln Financial Fou…Fidelity Investments …Donor Advised Charita…
New Hampshire Charitable FoundationNH31.1× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · Madelaine G Vonweber Trust Todd Fahey & William Tucker Co-Trustees · Granite United Way · Merrimack County Savings Bank Fdtn · Trust Uw Oleonda Jameson · Bank of New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · Eastern Bank Foundation · Cogswell Benevolent Trust · Bangor Savings Bank Foundation · Lincoln Financial Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Concord Hospital Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines