Skip to content

· Private foundation

Como Charitable Foundation Inc % Dennis Gardner

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.2M
Granted FY2025still arriving
27
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$244k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$1.3MCrime & Legal$1.2MHealth$836kCommunity Improvement$275kPublic Benefit$269kRecreation & Sports$239kPhilanthropy$161kReligion$121kOther$0
02FY2025 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $42k
  • $10k–50k13 grants · $254k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $913k
$15,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$23M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TOWN OF WINNSBORO$243,926
THE CENTER FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC$237,516
Individual grant recipient$227,058
FRANKLIN TENNIS ASSOCIATION$154,600
UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA MONROE FOUNDATION$50,000
FRIENDS OF CROWVILLE INC 2021 GRANT$40,000
MED CAMPS OF LOUISIANA$30,000
LOUISIANA TECH UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$25,000
Individual grant recipient$25,000
WINNSBORO MAIN STREET ECONOMIC COMMITTEE$22,500
FRANKLIN PARISH LIBRARY$15,000
GROW GILBERT$15,000
WISNER WINS$15,000
PRINCESS THEATRE FOUNDATION$15,000
BASKIN COMMUNITY COMMITTE$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 24%, against an area that typically sits at 21%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 21%PILOTS FOR PATIETNS: $5k → 24%FOOD BANK OF NORTHEAST LOUISIANA: $5k → 24%FOOD BANK OF NORTHEAST LOUISIANA: $5k → 24%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.6M · 36 repeat orgs$430k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +46% since the first grant, against +6% for those funded once.

36 repeat relationships: 24 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

36
15

Total granted

$5.6M
$365k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
+6%

Still filing today

33%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $65k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationCivil RightsRecreation & SportsHealthPhilanthropyAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SC
    Southern Center for Children & Families Inc
    6× · 2020–2025 · $1.2M · revenue +7%
  • LT
    LOUISIANA TECH UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $150k · revenue +46%
  • SF
    St Francis Medical Center Foundation Inc
    2× · 2021–2022 · $141k · revenue +16%

Funded once

  • FP
    FRANKLIN PARISH SCHOOL BOARD
    one grant, 2024 · $150k
  • FM
    FRANKLIN MEDICAL CENTER
    one grant, 2024 · $50k
  • FP
    FRANKLIN PARISH MEDICAL CENTER
    one grant, 2022 · $30k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Louisiana Cancer Foundation for Research and Education Inc

To improve opportunities for cancer research in Louisiana and enhance educational efforts regarding prevention and control over cancer.

Health
2
Louisiana Nurses Foundation

To improve the quality of health care in louisiana by the promotion, improvement, and protection of professional nursing through education, advocacy, communication, and professional integrity. to collect and distribute monies for specific…

—
3
Acadiana Animal Aid

Lafayette Animal Aid was incorporated and filed for exempt status 501(c)(3) in 1976 with sole purpose of helping to manage and care for the animal population in the lafayette Parish Area of Louisiana.

Animals
4
Jackson Council on the Aging Inc

The primary function of the Jackson Council on the Aging, Inc. is to improve the quality of life for the parish's elderly and to provide services to the elderly as well as coordinate and monitor the services of other local agencies serving…

—
5
Spirit of Charity Foundation

It is the mission of the spirit of charity foundation to support and facilitate patient-centered care, actively promote health and wellness and to advance medical research and education through fundraising efforts for the benefit of umcno,…

Philanthropy
6
Lsu Research Foundation
Community Improvement
7
Beauregard Health System Foundation Inc

To assist in improving healthcare in Beauregard Parish, Louisiana.

Health
8
Tensas Council on Aging Inc

The primary function of the Tensas Council on Aging, Inc. is to improve the quality of life for the parish's elderly and to provide services to the elderly as well as coordinate and monitor the services of other local agencies serving the…

Human Services
9
Heart of Louisiana Humane Society
Animals
10
Louisiana Spca Foundation Inc

To be operated exclusively for the benefit of, to perform functions of and to carry out the purposes of the louisiana society for the prevention of cruelty to animals, which operates to prevent cruelty to animals.

Animals
11
Louisiana-Mississippi Hospice and Palliative Care Organization Inc

To provide public awareness, education and technical assistance regarding end-of-life care, as well as advocacy for terminally ill and bereaved persons, striving to continually improve the quality of end-of-life care in Louisiana and…

Human Services
12
Louisiana Rural Health Association

The mission of the association is to promote rural health as a distinct concern in louisiana; to serve as a forum for a unified voice for healthcare providers, public officials, healthcare workers, educators, and consumers working to…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Louisiana At Monroe Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Pilots for Patients. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 54 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
14/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $1,024,609 · OtherIndividual grant recipientNOVARE FOUNDATION: $549,313 · OtherNOVARE FOUNDATIONFRANKLIN PARISH LIBRARY: $508,041 · OtherFRANKLIN PARISH LIBRARYUNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA FOUNDATION: $344,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $273,641 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTOWN OF WINNSBORO: $269,266 · OtherTOWN OF WINNSBOROFRANKLIN PARISH SCHOOL BOARD: $150,000 · Other+35 more: $1,116,563 · Other+35 moreSouthern Center for Children & Families Inc: $1,189,084 · Civil RightsSouthern Center for Ch…+1 more: $10,000 · Civil RightsFranklin Tennis Association Inc: $183,707 · Recreation & SportsMED-CAMPS OF LOUISIANA INC: $55,000 · Recreation & SportsLOUISIANA TECH UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $150,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA AT MONROE FOUNDATION: $50,000 · Education+1 more: $5,000 · EducationTHE BRANDON KIRK SIMS FOUNDATION: $35,000 · PhilanthropyFRIENDS OF CROWVILLE: $35,000 · PhilanthropyRIVER CITIES HUMANE SOCIETY FOR CAT: $30,000 · AnimalsPAWS OF NE LOUISIANA INC: $30,000 · AnimalsBASKIN COMMUNITY COMMITTEE: $50,000 · Community Improvement
Other$4,235,433Civil Rights$1,199,084Recreation & Sports$238,707Education$205,000Philanthropy$70,000Animals$60,000Community Improvement$50,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSouthern Center for Children & Families Inc: $1,189,084 over 6y, 2.4% of budgetFranklin Tennis Association Inc: $183,707 over 2y, 97% of budgetLOUISIANA TECH UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $150,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetSt Francis Medical Center Foundation Inc: $140,514 over 2y, 16% of budgetMED-CAMPS OF LOUISIANA INC: $55,000 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetBASKIN COMMUNITY COMMITTEE: $50,000 over 3y, 86% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA AT MONROE FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNORTHEAST LOUISIANA SUBSTANCE ABUSE INC: $45,000 over 3y, 4.3% of budgetTHE BRANDON KIRK SIMS FOUNDATION: $35,000 over 2y, 67% of budgetRIVER CITIES HUMANE SOCIETY FOR CAT: $30,000 over 6y, 3.5% of budgetPAWS OF NE LOUISIANA INC: $30,000 over 6y, 6.8% of budgetFOOD BANK OF NORTHEAST LOUISIANA INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFranklin Council on Aging Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetLIFESHARE BLOOD CENTER: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLAUREN VAUGHN MEMORIAL FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetPILOTS FOR PATIENTS: $5,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetLOUISIANA LIONS EYE FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Southern Center for Children & Families Inc ↗
  • Who funds Franklin Tennis Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds LOUISIANA TECH UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds St Francis Medical Center Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds MED-CAMPS OF LOUISIANA INC ↗
  • Who funds BASKIN COMMUNITY COMMITTEE ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA AT MONROE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NORTHEAST LOUISIANA SUBSTANCE ABUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BRANDON KIRK SIMS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF CROWVILLE ↗
  • Who funds RIVER CITIES HUMANE SOCIETY FOR CAT ↗
  • Who funds PAWS OF NE LOUISIANA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Scott FoundationLA21.9× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Scott Foundation · Lumen Clarke M Williams Foundation · Community Foundation of North Louisiana · Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Louisiana Foundation · Greater Houston Community Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Arthur J Gallagher Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Como Charitable Foundation Inc % Dennis Gardner funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Como Charitable Foundation Inc % Dennis Gardner. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Como Charitable Foundation Inc % Dennis Gardner?

    Find your warmest path to Como Charitable Foundation Inc % Dennis Gardner through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 54 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Como Charitable Foundation Inc % Dennis Gardner’s filings →

    More from the funding graph