Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

Community Solutions International Inc

We work to end homelessness and the conditions that create it.

$5.7M
Granted FY2024still arriving
58
Grants FY2024still arriving
21
States reached
$370k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0163% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2021–2024.

Housing & Shelter$4.3MHuman Services$3.2MPhilanthropy$781kHealth$681kCommunity Improvement$308kEmployment$293kPublic Benefit$212kOther$5.7M
02FY2024 · 58 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k9 grants · $264k
  • $50k–250k47 grants · $4.7M
  • $250k+2 grants · $620k
$98,829
Median grant
21
States reached
$183M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOUSING COUNSELING SERVICES$370,000
PARTNERS FOR HOME$250,000
OPEN DOORS HOMELESS COALITION$175,000
HOUSING CONNECTOR$172,500
ARLINGTON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES$145,887
METROPOLITAN WASHINGTON COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS$141,313
BETHESDA CARES INC$136,000
STRATEGIES TO END HOMELESSNESS$131,313
THE COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP FOR THE PREVENTION OF HOMELESSNESS$126,938
HENNEPIN COUNTY - OFFICE OF HOUSING STABILITY$123,648
HOMELESS ACTION NETWORK OF DETROIT (HAND)$120,000
CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER - 201 W COLFAX AVE DENVER CO 80202$116,931
UNITED WAY OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE DBA UNITED WAY OF GREATER NASHVILLE$110,938
SOCO CARES - KEEP TRINIDAD SAFE$110,063
MINNESOTA ASSISTANCE COUNCIL FOR VETERANS$106,191
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $3.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 68% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%REGIONAL TASK FORCE ON THE HOMELESS: $100k → 11%SACRAMENTO STEPS FORWARD: $106k → 12%UNION STATION HOMELESS SERVICES: $101k → 14%BAKERSFIELD KERN REGIONAL HOMELESS COLLABORATIVE: $100k → 18%ELEVATE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $100k → 19%CHANGING HOMELESSNESSINC: $81k → 14%HOMELESS ACTION NETWORK OF DETROIT: $200k → 21%LOVE INC OF COLUMBIA: $65k → 17%CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC DIOCESE OF MADISON: $30k → 10%YAMHILL COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP: $20k → 11%JOURNEY HOME: $83k → 11%TENNESSEE VALLEY COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS: $20k → 12%THE PINON PROJECT: $50k → 15%LOAVES AND FISHES MINISTRIES OF FREMONT COUNTY INC: $50k → 17%SOCO CARES - KEEP TRINIDAD SAFE: $110k → 18%STRATEGIES TO END HOMELESSNESS: $131k → 16%FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER OF SOUTH SOUND: $82k → 9%ANCHORAGE COALITION TO END HOMELESSNESS: $102k → 10%COMING HOME OF MIDDLESEX COUNTY INC: $50k → 8%THE HAVEN AT FIRST AND MARKET: $96k → 8%BETHESDA CARES INC: $136k → 8%PREBLE STREET: $90k → 7%ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY DISTRICT COUNCIL OF MARIN COUNTY: $50k → 8%BAKERSFIELD KERN REGIONAL HOMELESS COLLABORATIVE: $100k → 18%ELEVATE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $100k → 19%HOMELESS ACTION NETWORK OF DETROIT (HAND): $120k → 21%FOSTERING LIFE-CHANGING OPPORTUNITIES: $20k → 17%JOURNEY HOME: $50k → 11%GRAND VALLEY CATHOLIC OUTREACH: $50k → 11%STRATEGIES TO END HOMELESSNESS: $100k → 16%FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER OF SOUTH SOUND: $82k → 9%COMING HOME OF MIDDLESEX COUNTY INC: $23k → 8%THE HAVEN AT FIRST AND MARKET: $96k → 8%BETHESDA CARES INC: $130k → 8%PARTNERS IN CARE OAHU CONTINUUM CARE: $17k → 9%HOMELESS ACTION NETWORK OF DETROIT (HAND): $80k → 21%OPERATION STAND DOWN TENNESSEE: $25k → 14%BETHESDA CARES INC: $100k → 8%HOMELESS ACTION NETWORK OF DETROIT: $60k → 21%THE GATHERING INN: $57k → 6%HOMELESS ACTION NETWORK OF DETROIT (HAND): $6k → 21%THE GATHERING INN: $30k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
ME
VT
WA
MT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
IA
OH
NJ
CT
CA
CO
MO
VA
MD
NM
KS
TN
NC
DC
HI
MS
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

58%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$8.7M · 34 repeat orgs$6.4M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +18% since the first grant, against +13% for the ones you funded once.

34 repeat relationships — 30 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 18 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

34
46

Total granted

$8.7M
$4.5M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+13%

Still filing today

76%
70%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 64% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.9M went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterHealthCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyPublic BenefitOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HC
    HOUSING COUNSELING SERVICES INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $740k · revenue +3%
  • SH
    Shelter House Inc
    3× · 2021–2023 · $563k · revenue +33%
  • BC
    BETHESDA CARES INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $366k · revenue +25%

Funded once

  • 8A
    816 ARGONNE CSLC LLC
    one grant, 2022 · $500k
  • 1N
    1450 NORTH LAMAR STREET CSLC LLC
    one grant, 2023 · $350k
  • PS
    PARK SIXTEEN HOLDINGS LLC
    one grant, 2022 · $350k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Welcome Home Coalition

Welcome Home is a diverse coalition in the Portland metropolitan region that uses its collective resources to create healthy communities by ensuring everyone has an affordable and stable home. We use community education and collaboration…

Community Improvement
2
Tarrant County Homeless Coalition

Tarrant County Homeless Coalition leads the community solution to homelessness in greater Tarrant and Parker counties by serving as a catalyst for community transformation.

Human Services
3
Frontline Housing Inc

Frontline Housing, Inc.'s mission is to provide low barrier permanent housing options to individuals and families experiencing homelessness. Once placed in housing, Frontline Housing provides Financial Well-Being services to the community…

Human Services
4
Home First - Interfaith Housing and Family Services

Home-first offers permanent solutions to homelessness by providing transitional housing and permanent housing, homelessness prevention assitance and support services to strengthen families and build commun

—
5
Family Housing Network of Fort Collins Inc

Faith Family Hospitality's mission is to support families experiencing homelessness to achieve sustainable self-sufficiency in a timely and dignified manner. This interfaith volunteer effort coordinates the work of 30 diverse Fort Collins…

Human Services
6
Coalition for the Homeless of Houston Harris County

The coalition for the homeless of houston/harris county acts as a catalyst, uniting partners and maximizing resources to move people experiencing homelessness into permanent housing with supportive services.

Housing & Shelter
7
Chicago Coalition to End Homelessness

Chicago Coalition to End Homelessness (CCH) builds community power and advances racial equity through organizing, advocacy, legal assistance, and education to prevent and end homelessness because housing is a human right.

Housing & Shelter
8
Community Housing Council
Housing & Shelter
9
Contra Costa Interfaith Transitional Housing Inc

Hope Solutions provides permanent affordable housing coupled with well-executed support services to people who are homeless or at risk to become homeless in Contra Costa County. Support services are individualized for each person or family…

Housing & Shelter
10
Community Homeless Solutions

To lead in ending the cycle of homelessness or violence by providing safe housing, compassionate support, and opportunities for self-sufficiency through outreach, emergency shelter, transitional housing and supporting services.

Housing & Shelter
11
Next Move Homeless Services

To help families with children and individuals achieve self-reliance

—
12
California Housing Partner Corporation

The California Housing Partnership Corporation creates and preserves affordable and sustainable homes for Californians with low incomes by providing expert financial and policy solutions to nonprofit and public partners.

Unclassified

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Community Partnership for the Prevention of Homelessness and the most unlike its peers is Soco Cares. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyAffordable Housing Developm…Domestic Violence ServicesChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Health Access Advocacy and …Food Banks and PantriesChristian Missionary Organi…United Way AffiliatesMilitary Veterans SupportSenior Support ServicesCommunity Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%3%<5yr14%9%5–10yr19%19%10–20yr16%27%20–35yr13%31%35–55yr16%10%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%6%<5yr14%7%5–10yr19%19%10–20yr16%28%20–35yr13%36%35–55yr16%5%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 6% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/99
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,466

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

73 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 73 of the 99 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
73/73
Grantees still filing
45/73
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

HENNEPIN COUNTY LIBRARY — $665,398 · OtherHENNEPIN COUNTY LIBRARY816 ARGONNE CSLC LLC — $500,000 · Other816 ARGONNE CSLC LLCTHE COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP FOR THE PREVENTION OF HOMELESSNESS — $353,876 · OtherTHE COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP FOR THE PREVENTI…1450 NORTH LAMAR STREET CSLC LLC — $350,000 · Other1450 NORTH LAMAR STREET CSLC LLCPARK SIXTEEN HOLDINGS LLC — $350,000 · OtherPARK SIXTEEN HOLDINGS LLCHOMELESS RESOURCE COUNCIL OF THE SIERRAS — $280,751 · OtherPARTNERS IN CARE OAHU CONTINIUM CARE — $272,658 · OtherCity of Rockford — $253,136 · OtherBOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ADAMS COUNTY COLORADO — $219,726 · OtherMECKLENBURG COUNTY — $203,188 · Other644 GLASTONBURY CSLC LLC — $200,000 · Other+24 more — $2,092,702 · Other+24 moreHOUSING COUNSELING SERVICES INC — $740,000 · Housing & ShelterHOUSING COUNSELING SERVICES INCOPEN DOORS HOMELESS COALITION — $639,438 · Housing & ShelterOPEN DOORS HOMELESS COALITIONShelter House Inc — $562,500 · Housing & ShelterShelter House IncMETROPOLITAN DENVER HOMELESS INITIATIVE INC — $411,166 · Housing & ShelterMETROPOLITAN DENVER HOMELESS IN…PARTNERS FOR HOME INC — $350,000 · Housing & ShelterPARTNERS FOR HOME INCNEW MEXICO COALITION TO END HOMELESSNESS — $312,063 · Housing & ShelterNEW MEXICO COALITION TO END HOM…HOMELESS ALLIANCE OF WESTERN NEW YORK INC — $198,000 · Housing & ShelterHOUSING CONNECTOR — $172,500 · Housing & ShelterPOSADA — $160,900 · Housing & Shelter+10 more — $708,554 · Housing & Shelter+10 moreHomeless Action Network of Detroit — $466,000 · Human ServicesHomeless Action Network…BETHESDA CARES INC — $366,000 · Human ServicesBETHESDA CARES INCStrategies to End Homelessness Inc — $231,313 · Human ServicesStrategies to End Homel…Elevate Community Services Inc — $200,126 · Human ServicesElevate Community Servi…BAKERSFIELD KERN REGIONAL HOMELESS COLLABORATIVE — $200,000 · Human ServicesBAKERSFIELD KERN REGION…THE HAVEN AT FIRST AND MARKET INC — $191,376 · Human ServicesTHE HAVEN AT FIRST AND …The Family Support Center of South Sound — $163,500 · Human ServicesJOURNEY HOME INC — $133,186 · Human ServicesSOCO CARES — $110,063 · Human Services+19 more — $1,136,605 · Human Services+19 moreCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF ABILENE — $356,376 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF WELD COUNTY INC — $223,330 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE INC — $110,938 · PhilanthropyUnited Way of North Central Florida Inc — $60,020 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF MISSOULA COUNTY — $30,000 · PhilanthropyHILLTOP HEALTH SERVICES CORPORATION — $250,876 · HealthCOMMUNITY HEALTH PARTNERSHIP (CHP) — $157,625 · HealthWest Mountain Regional Health Alliance — $131,750 · HealthFLAGLER HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION INC — $90,550 · HealthLAUREL HILL CENTER — $50,000 · HealthCHATTANOOGA REGIONAL HOMELESS COALITION INC — $180,000 · Community ImprovementWayne-Metropolitan Community Action Agency Inc — $93,188 · Community ImprovementNORTH HARTFORD PARTNERSHIP INC F/K/N NORTHEAST NEIGHBORHOOD PARTNERS IN — $25,000 · Community Improvement+1 more — $10,000 · Community ImprovementMINNESOTA ASSISTANCE COUNCIL FOR VETERANS — $293,129 · EmploymentMETROPOLITAN WASHINGTON COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS — $141,313 · Public BenefitNATION'S FINEST — $71,000 · Public Benefit
Other$5,741,435Housing & Shelter$4,255,121Human Services$3,198,169Philanthropy$780,664Health$680,801Community Improvement$308,188Employment$293,129Public Benefit$212,313

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHOUSING COUNSELING SERVICES INC — $740,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetOPEN DOORS HOMELESS COALITION — $639,438 over 3y, 9.8% of budgetShelter House Inc — $562,500 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetHomeless Action Network of Detroit — $466,000 over 3y, 3.1% of budgetMETROPOLITAN DENVER HOMELESS INITIATIVE INC — $411,166 over 3y, 5.1% of budgetBETHESDA CARES INC — $366,000 over 2y, 7.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF ABILENE — $356,376 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP FOR THE PREVENTION OF HOMELESSNESS — $353,876 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPARTNERS FOR HOME INC — $350,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetNEW MEXICO COALITION TO END HOMELESSNESS — $312,063 over 1y, 7.0% of budgetMINNESOTA ASSISTANCE COUNCIL FOR VETERANS — $293,129 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetHOMELESS RESOURCE COUNCIL OF THE SIERRAS — $280,751 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetHILLTOP HEALTH SERVICES CORPORATION — $250,876 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetStrategies to End Homelessness Inc — $231,313 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetUNITED WAY OF WELD COUNTY INC — $223,330 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetElevate Community Services Inc — $200,126 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetBAKERSFIELD KERN REGIONAL HOMELESS COLLABORATIVE — $200,000 over 2y, 7.0% of budgetHOMELESS ALLIANCE OF WESTERN NEW YORK INC — $198,000 over 2y, 7.6% of budgetTHE HAVEN AT FIRST AND MARKET INC — $191,376 over 2y, 5.1% of budgetCHATTANOOGA REGIONAL HOMELESS COALITION INC — $180,000 over 3y, 4.2% of budgetHOUSING CONNECTOR — $172,500 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetThe Family Support Center of South Sound — $163,500 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetPOSADA — $160,900 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH PARTNERSHIP (CHP) — $157,625 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetMETROPOLITAN WASHINGTON COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS — $141,313 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetJOURNEY HOME INC — $133,186 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetWest Mountain Regional Health Alliance — $131,750 over 2y, 6.0% of budgetMIRIAM'S HOUSE INC — $131,313 over 1y, 7.8% of budgetCOUNCIL FOR THE HOMELESS — $113,856 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetUNITED WAY OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE INC — $110,938 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSOCO CARES — $110,063 over 1y, 36% of budgetSacramento Steps Forward — $106,375 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetWASHTENAW HOUSING ALLIANCE — $100,925 over 1y, 11% of budgetUNION STATION HOMELESS SERVICES — $100,922 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetREGIONAL TASK FORCE ON THE HOMELESS — $100,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR COMMUNITY ALLIANCES — $98,560 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetWayne-Metropolitan Community Action Agency Inc — $93,188 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFLAGLER HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION INC — $90,550 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetPREBLE STREET — $90,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE GATHERING INN — $87,350 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetCHANGING HOMELESSNESS INC — $80,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCatholic Charities of the Archdiocese of Chicago — $79,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBROWNSVILLE PARTNERSHIP INC — $75,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetComing Home of Middlesex County — $72,525 over 2y, 5.0% of budgetNATION'S FINEST — $71,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLove Columbia Corp Love Columbia — $65,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetUnited Way of North Central Florida Inc — $60,020 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetTOWER GROVE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $50,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

East Bay Community Fo…The Colorado Health F…El Pomar FoundationEnergy Outreach Color…The Denver FoundationCenter for Technology…Enterprise Community …Mile High United Way …Wells Fargo FoundationGates Family Foundati…Colorado Coalition fo…Kaiser Foundation Hos…
East Bay Community FoundationCA25× affinity14 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: East Bay Community Foundation · The Colorado Health Foundation · El Pomar Foundation · Energy Outreach Colorado · The Denver Foundation · Center for Technology and Civic Life · Enterprise Community Partners Inc · Mile High United Way Inc · Wells Fargo Foundation · Gates Family Foundation · Colorado Coalition for the Homeless · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Community Solutions International Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 46%
  • Bethesda Cares Inc — 100% of income from government
  • Changing Homelessness Inc — 84% of income from government
  • Yamhill Community Action Partnership — 61% of income from government
  • Journey Home Inc — 59% of income from government
  • Coming Home of Middlesex County — 46% of income from government
  • Vermont Housing Finance Agency — 17% of income from government
  • Laurel Hill Center — 10% of income from government
  • Siuslaw Outreach Services — 8% of income from government
  • Third Sector New England Inc — 3% of income from government
  • United Way of North Central Florida Inc — 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
17report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
4rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 99 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines