Skip to content
Community Ministry Support Inc at a glance

· Public charity

Community Ministry Support Inc

The organization operates a thrift store that receives donated clothes and household goods.

$286k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$143k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$1.2MHuman Services$469kHealth$144kHousing & Shelter$125kYouth Development$87kEducation$71kInternational$58kRecreation & Sports$35kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 9 grants below total $277,220, the rows itemized in this filing. The $285,993 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $8,773 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k8 grants · $135k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $143k
$16,840
Median grant
2
States reached
$222k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DOOR International$142,500
Fellowship of Christian Athlete$16,840
Southside Academy$16,840
RM Pregnancy Care Ctr$16,840
RR Union Missions$16,840
Faith Christian Ministry$16,840
Peacemakers$16,840
Christian Adoption Services$16,840
Pregnancy Support Center$16,840
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $452k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%PREGNANCY SUPPORT CENTER: $21k → 20%CHRIST CENTERED ASSISTANCE NETWORKS: $18k → 21%UNION MISSION OF ROANOKE RAPIDS IN: $21k → 20%CHRIST CENTERED ASSISTANCE NETWORKS: $16k → 21%PREGNANCY SUPPORT CENTER: $18k → 20%CHRIST CENTERED ASSISTANCE NETWORKS: $12k → 21%UNION MISSION OF ROANOKE RAPIDS IN: $18k → 20%CHRIST CENTERED ASSISTANCE NETWORKS: $10k → 21%RR Union Missions: $17k → 20%CHRIST CENTERED ASSISTANCE NETWORKS: $9k → 21%Pregnancy Support Center: $17k → 20%CHRIST CENTERED ASSISTANCE NETWORKS: $8k → 21%PREGNANCY SUPPORT CENTER: $16k → 20%CHRIST CENTERED ASSISTANCE NETWORKS: $8k → 21%UNION MISSION OF ROANOKE RAPIDS IN: $16k → 20%CHRIST CENTERED ASSISTANCE NETWORKS: $6k → 21%UNION MISSION OF ROANOKE RAPIDS IN: $12k → 20%PREGNANCY SUPPORT CENTER: $12k → 20%PREGNANCY SUPPORT CENTER: $10k → 20%UNION MISSION OF ROANOKE RAPIDS INC: $10k → 20%PREGNANCY SUPPORT CENTER: $9k → 20%UNION MISSION OF ROANOKE RAPIDS INC: $9k → 20%UNION MISSION OF ROANOKE RAPIDS IN: $8k → 20%PREGNANCY SUPPORT CENTER: $8k → 20%PREGNANCY SUPPORT CENTER: $8k → 20%UNION MISSION OF ROANOKE RAPIDS INC: $8k → 20%A TOUCH OF FATHERS LOVE: $11k → 15%PEACEMAKERS: $21k → 15%PEACEMAKERS: $18k → 15%Peacemakers: $17k → 15%PEACEMAKERS: $16k → 15%PEACEMAKERS: $12k → 15%PEACEMAKERS: $11k → 15%PEACEMAKERS: $10k → 15%PEACEMAKERS: $9k → 15%PEACEMAKERS: $5k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.2M · 13 repeat orgs$11k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +76% since the first grant, against -44% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
1

Total granted

$2.2M
$11k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+76%
-44%

Still filing today

85%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentHealthReligionEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FO
    FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES
    9× · 2017–2025 · $122k · revenue +120%
  • PS
    PREGNANCY SUPPORT CENTER
    9× · 2017–2025 · $118k · revenue +284%
  • PC
    PREGNANCY CARE CENTER OF ROCKY MOUNT INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $118k · revenue +76%

Funded once

  • AT
    A TOUCH OF THE FATHER'S LOVE INC
    one grant, 2022 · $11k · revenue -44%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Roanoke Area Ministries

To serve the indigent.

—
2
Hannahs Home

Hannahs Home is a Christ-centered life-affirming maternity home for women who are in crisis.

Human Services
3
Christian Care

Provide meals, clothing, counseling, referrals, spiritual guidance and shelter to anyone in need without charge

Housing & Shelter
4
Safe Harbor of Nc Inc

Safe Harbor provides a faith-based community for rebuilding, renewing, and recovery. We work together with volunteers and other nonprofit organizations to provide a wide range of services to those experiencing homelessness, single mothers,…

Health
5
Rpm Ministries Inc

To preach and proclaim the gospel of Jesus Christ through evangelism, teaching, counseling, discipling and outreach. Our specific ministry is to those broken through addiction and trauma, providing recovery and life training skills through…

Religion
6
Beth-Hark Christian Counseling Center

Provide crisis, marital, family, drug and spiritual counseling to the community; operate a soup kitchen and pantry to provide food to the needy.

—
7
Carolina Pregnancy Center Inc

The Carolina Pregnancy Center is a nonprofit ministry serving women, and their families, who are seeking help in making decisions about their pregnancy and well-being. Services include: Counseling, continuing emotional support, referrals…

Health
8
Sonshine Ministries

Providing food clothing and shelter to individuals in life crisis situations

—
9
Refuge of Hope Ministries

Glorify and serve god by providing meals for hungry men, women, and children, emergency shelter and transition to independence for homeless men, and spiritual hope through jesus christ.

Religion
10
Burke United Christian Ministries

The mission of burke united christian ministries is to restore resilience in people living in poverty or experiencing homelessness, ensuring their essential needs are met.

—
11
Rhode Island Rescue Ministries

Christian mission to the poor providing food, shelter clothing and counseling to the homeless

Human Services
12
Rahab House

Rahab House is deeply committed to the rescue, refuge, and restoration of human trafficking survivors. We provide comprehensive support that encompasses immediate safety and connections to long-term restorative care in alignment with the…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Peacemakers of Rocky Mount Inc; the most unlike its peers is Tar Roanoke Chaplaincy Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

D O O R INTERNATIONAL: $1,161,281 · OtherD O O R INTERNATIONALChristian Adoption Services Inc: $118,110 · OtherChristian Adoption Services Inc+3 more: $68,618 · OtherPREGNANCY SUPPORT CENTER: $118,476 · Human ServicesPREGNANCY SUPPORT CENTE…PEACEMAKERS OF ROCKY MOUNT INC: $118,148 · Human ServicesPEACEMAKERS OF ROCKY MO…Union Mission of Roanoke Rapids: $118,041 · Human ServicesUnion Mission of Roanok…UNITED COMMUNITY MINISTRIES INC: $98,366 · Human ServicesUNITED COMMUNITY MINIST…+1 more: $11,420 · Human ServicesFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $122,444 · Youth DevelopmentPREGNANCY CARE CENTER OF ROCKY MOUNT INC: $118,441 · HealthFAITH CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES OF NASH COUNTY: $118,172 · ReligionSOUTHSIDE ACADEMY INCORPORATED: $71,157 · Education
Other$1,348,009Human Services$464,451Youth Development$122,444Health$118,441Religion$118,172Education$71,157

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $122,444 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetPREGNANCY SUPPORT CENTER: $118,476 over 9y, 13% of budgetPREGNANCY CARE CENTER OF ROCKY MOUNT INC: $118,441 over 9y, 2.5% of budgetFAITH CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES OF NASH COUNTY: $118,172 over 9y, 7.0% of budgetPEACEMAKERS OF ROCKY MOUNT INC: $118,148 over 9y, 2.5% of budgetChristian Adoption Services Inc: $118,110 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetUnion Mission of Roanoke Rapids: $118,041 over 9y, 5.3% of budgetUNITED COMMUNITY MINISTRIES INC: $98,366 over 8y, 4.6% of budgetSOUTHSIDE ACADEMY INCORPORATED: $71,157 over 4y, 12% of budgetTAR ROANOKE CHAPLAINCY INC: $43,988 over 5y, 65% of budgetMY SISTERS HOUSE INC: $12,340 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetHannahs Place Inc: $12,290 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetA TOUCH OF THE FATHER'S LOVE INC: $11,420 over 1y, 2.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES ↗
  • Who funds PREGNANCY SUPPORT CENTER ↗
  • Who funds PREGNANCY CARE CENTER OF ROCKY MOUNT INC ↗
  • Who funds FAITH CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES OF NASH COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds PEACEMAKERS OF ROCKY MOUNT INC ↗
  • Who funds Christian Adoption Services Inc ↗
  • Who funds Union Mission of Roanoke Rapids ↗
  • Who funds UNITED COMMUNITY MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHSIDE ACADEMY INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds TAR ROANOKE CHAPLAINCY INC ↗
  • Who funds MY SISTERS HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds Hannahs Place Inc ↗
  • Who funds A TOUCH OF THE FATHER'S LOVE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Nickolas Bunn Boddie …North Carolina Commun…Rocky Mount Community…Boddie Noell Foundati…Barnhill Family Found…Duke Energy FoundationThe Pfizer Foundation…Natl Christian Charit…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Nickolas Bunn Boddie Sr and Lucy Mayo Lucy Mayo Boddie FoundationNC17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Nickolas Bunn Boddie Sr and Lucy Mayo Lucy Mayo Boddie Foundation · North Carolina Community Foundation · Rocky Mount Community Foundation Inc · Boddie Noell Foundation Attn Tax and Risk Management · Barnhill Family Foundation · Duke Energy Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Community Ministry Support Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Community Ministry Support Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Community Ministry Support’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home