· Public charity
Community Ministry Support Inc
The organization operates a thrift store that receives donated clothes and household goods.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 9 grants below total $277,220 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $285,993 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $8,773 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k8 grants · $135k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $143k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| DOOR International | $142,500 |
| Fellowship of Christian Athlete | $16,840 |
| RM Pregnancy Care Ctr | $16,840 |
| RR Union Missions | $16,840 |
| Faith Christian Ministry | $16,840 |
| Peacemakers | $16,840 |
| Southside Academy | $16,840 |
| Christian Adoption Services | $16,840 |
| Pregnancy Support Center | $16,840 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $452k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +76% since the first grant, against -44% for the ones you funded once.
13 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FOFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES9× · 2017–2025 · $122k · revenue +120%
- PSPREGNANCY SUPPORT CENTER9× · 2017–2025 · $118k · revenue +284%
- PCPREGNANCY CARE CENTER OF ROCKY MOUNT INC9× · 2017–2025 · $118k · revenue +76%
Funded once
- ATA TOUCH OF THE FATHER'S LOVE INCone grant, 2022 · $11k · revenue -44%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To serve the indigent.
Hannahs Home is a Christ-centered life-affirming maternity home for women who are in crisis.
Provide meals, clothing, counseling, referrals, spiritual guidance and shelter to anyone in need without charge
Safe Harbor provides a faith-based community for rebuilding, renewing, and recovery. We work together with volunteers and other nonprofit organizations to provide a wide range of services to those experiencing homelessness, single mothers,…
To preach and proclaim the gospel of Jesus Christ through evangelism, teaching, counseling, discipling and outreach. Our specific ministry is to those broken through addiction and trauma, providing recovery and life training skills through…
Provide crisis, marital, family, drug and spiritual counseling to the community; operate a soup kitchen and pantry to provide food to the needy.
The Carolina Pregnancy Center is a nonprofit ministry serving women, and their families, who are seeking help in making decisions about their pregnancy and well-being. Services include: Counseling, continuing emotional support, referrals…
Providing food clothing and shelter to individuals in life crisis situations
Glorify and serve god by providing meals for hungry men, women, and children, emergency shelter and transition to independence for homeless men, and spiritual hope through jesus christ.
The mission of burke united christian ministries is to restore resilience in people living in poverty or experiencing homelessness, ensuring their essential needs are met.
Christian mission to the poor providing food, shelter clothing and counseling to the homeless
Rahab House is deeply committed to the rescue, refuge, and restoration of human trafficking survivors. We provide comprehensive support that encompasses immediate safety and connections to long-term restorative care in alignment with the…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Peacemakers of Rocky Mount Inc and the most unlike its peers is Tar Roanoke Chaplaincy Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES ↗
- Who funds PREGNANCY SUPPORT CENTER ↗
- Who funds PREGNANCY CARE CENTER OF ROCKY MOUNT INC ↗
- Who funds FAITH CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES OF NASH COUNTY ↗
- Who funds PEACEMAKERS OF ROCKY MOUNT INC ↗
- Who funds Christian Adoption Services Inc ↗
- Who funds Union Mission of Roanoke Rapids ↗
- Who funds UNITED COMMUNITY MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTHSIDE ACADEMY INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds TAR ROANOKE CHAPLAINCY INC ↗
- Who funds MY SISTERS HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds Hannahs Place Inc ↗
- Who funds A TOUCH OF THE FATHER'S LOVE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Nickolas Bunn Boddie Sr and Lucy Mayo Lucy Mayo Boddie Foundation · North Carolina Community Foundation · Rocky Mount Community Foundation Inc · Boddie Noell Foundation Attn Tax and Risk Management · Barnhill Family Foundation · Duke Energy Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Community Ministry Support Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.