· Private foundation
Boddie Noell Foundation Attn Tax and Risk Management
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 47% of BODDIE NOELL FOUNDATION ATTN TAX AND RISK MANAGEMENT’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k35 grants · $91k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $106k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $109k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| EAST CAROLINA COUNCIL - BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA | $58,000 |
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE TAR RIVER REGION | $51,250 |
| SCHOLARSHIP AMERICA | $25,000 |
| AMERICAN RED CROSS | $20,000 |
| UNITED WAY TAR RIVER REGION | $10,500 |
| CAROLINA GATEWAY PARTNERSHIP | $10,000 |
| UNITED COMMUNITY MINISTRIES | $10,000 |
| CITY OF REFUGE FOUNDATION INC | $10,000 |
| THE UNC HEALTH FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| JACKSON-FEILD BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SERVICES | $10,000 |
| NASH COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY - STONEWALL MANOR | $7,500 |
| NORTH CAROLINA WESLEYAN COLLEGE | $6,000 |
| UNC HEALTH NASH FOUNDATION | $5,200 |
| MEALS ON WHEELS OF ROCKY MOUNT | $5,000 |
| FOUNDATION FIGHTING BLINDNESS | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $106k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +40% since the first grant, against +5% for the ones you funded once.
44 repeat relationships — 39 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ECEAST CAROLINA COUNCIL BSA5× · 2020–2024 · $298k · revenue +93%
SCHOLARSHIP AMERICA INC5× · 2020–2024 · $125k · revenue +32%
UNITED WAY TAR RIVER REGION5× · 2020–2024 · $63k · revenue +10%
Funded once
- CHCOVENANT HOMES INCORPORATEDone grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +8%
- UUNC-TVone grant, 2020 · $5k
- RERIPPLE EFFECTS GROUPone grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +5%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The research triangle regional partnership is an association of area economic development agencies dedicated to keeping the research triangle region economically strong by collectively marketing the region's competitive advantages and…
Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors.
Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors
Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors
Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors
Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors
Nourish people. build solutions. empower communities. no one goes hungry.
Provide food, shelter, rehabilitation and christian ministry to the poor and homeless
To provide a positive and safe living environment for hurting, abused, neglected and at-risk children placed privately and by the north carolina department of social services
The Children's Home Society of North Carolina's mission is to promote the right of every child to a permanent, safe, and loving family.
Provision of residential facilities to disabled persons in north carolina
Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Foundation for the Carolinas and the most unlike its peers is Needles Eye Ministries Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 29% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
37 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 37 of the 60 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds EAST CAROLINA COUNCIL BSA ↗
- Who funds NORTH CAROLINA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY INC ↗
- Who funds SCHOLARSHIP AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR THE CAROLINAS ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY TAR RIVER REGION ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE TAR RIVER REGION INC ↗
- Who funds THE CAROLINAS GATEWAY PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds City of Refuge Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds UNITED COMMUNITY MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds NASH COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds UNC HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds MY SISTERS HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS OF ROCKY MOUNT INC ↗
- Who funds PEACEMAKERS OF ROCKY MOUNT INC ↗
- Who funds ROCKY MOUNT ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds DOWN EAST PARTNERSHIP FOR CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds EDGECOMBE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds COVENANT HOMES INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS NORTH CAROLINA INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS HOMES OF NC INC ↗
- Who funds ROCKY MOUNT ROTARY CHARITABLE TRUST ↗
- Who funds Capstone Foundation ↗
- Who funds SLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC ↗
- Who funds THE NORTH CAROLINA AGRICULTURAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds FAITH CHRISTIAN SCHOOL OF ROCKY MOUNT INC ↗
- Who funds RIPE FOR REVIVAL ↗
- Who funds SOUND RIVERS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: North Carolina Community Foundation · Barnhill Family Foundation · Southern Bank Foundation · Deleon Carter Foundation · Nickolas Bunn Boddie Sr and Lucy Mayo Lucy Mayo Boddie Foundation · The Cannon Foundation Inc · Rocky Mount Community Foundation Inc · Corning Incorporated Foundation · Mims Charitable Foundation Trust · United Way Tar River Region · Equitable Foundation Inc · Anonymous Trust U/A Dated 2-4-2008
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Boddie Noell Foundation Attn Tax and Risk Management funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Boddie Noell Foundation Attn Tax and Risk Management?
Find your warmest path to Boddie Noell Foundation Attn Tax and Risk Management through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.