Skip to content

Minnesota · Public charity

Community Mediation & Restorative Servic Es Inc

To develop the capacity of our community to respectfully resolve conflict and repair harm.

$30k
Granted FY2023
2
Itemized grants FY2023
2
Organizations funded FY2023
50%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2023
$20k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2023
$14,920
Largest grant, FY2023
$14,920
Organizations funded a year
2 to 13
FY2020 to FY2023
States reached, FY2023
1
Total assets, FY2023
$884k

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 50% of the organizations Community Mediation & Restorative Servic Es Inc funded were first-time grantees, receiving 25% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23
Human ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY20232$20k50%
FY20226$160k17%
FY202110$178k20%
FY202013$212kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2023.

Housing & Shelter$427kCommunity Improvement$84kInternational$29kSocial Science$22kCrime & Legal$8k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2020 to FY2023, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Sakan Community Resources Inc$80,920413%
Capi USA$66,50031%
Phumulani$51,00035%
Abstrakt Development LLC$49,9731n/a
The Organization of Liberians in Minnesota$30,000312%
Northside Residents Redevelopment Council Inc$27,99926%
The Anika Foundation$23,00024%
Aliveness Project Inc$23,00021%
New American Development Cente$20,00011%
Power of People Leadership Institute$20,00014%
Show all 15 grantees
All grantees of Community Mediation & Restorative Servic Es Inc by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Sakan Community Resources Inc$80,920413%
Capi USA$66,50031%
Phumulani$51,00035%
Abstrakt Development LLC$49,9731n/a
The Organization of Liberians in Minnesota$30,000312%
Northside Residents Redevelopment Council Inc$27,99926%
The Anika Foundation$23,00024%
Aliveness Project Inc$23,00021%
New American Development Cente$20,00011%
Power of People Leadership Institute$20,00014%
Lao Assistance Center of Minnesota$20,00015%
Ind School District 279$19,0002n/a
African Career Education & Resources In$18,00011%
Hmong American Mediation Center Inc$8,0001n/a
1 Day at a Time$5,06016%

Plus 2 recipients with no EIN on record ($107k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Community Mediation & Restorative Servic Es Inc supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSakan Community Resources Inc: $80,920 over 4y, 13% of budgetCapi USA: $66,500 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetPhumulani: $51,000 over 3y, 5.1% of budgetThe Organization of Liberians in Minnesota: $30,000 over 3y, 12% of budgetNorthside Residents Redevelopment Council Inc: $27,999 over 2y, 6.5% of budgetThe Anika Foundation: $23,000 over 2y, 4.3% of budgetAliveness Project Inc: $23,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetNew American Development Cente: $20,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetPower of People Leadership Institute: $20,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetLao Assistance Center of Minnesota: $20,000 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetAfrican Career Education & Resources In: $18,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budget1 Day at a Time: $5,060 over 1y, 5.5% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 12.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Minneapolis FoundationMN27.9× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Minneapolis Foundation · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · Otto Bremer Trust · Greater Twin Cities United Way · Alliance for Metropolitan Stability · Women's Foundation of Minnesota · Headwaters Foundation for Justice · The McKnight Foundation · Minnesota Voice · Target Foundation · Pohlad Family Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Community Mediation & Restorative Servic Es Inc with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Community Mediation & Restorative Servic Es Inc?

Find your warmest path to Community Mediation & Restorative Servic Es Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Community Mediation & Restorative Servic Es Inc

How much does Community Mediation & Restorative Servic Es Inc give?
Community Mediation & Restorative Servic Es Inc reported 2 itemized grants totaling $19,980, out of $30,234 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2023 IRS filing. It funded between 2 and 13 organizations a year over FY2020 to FY2023.
What does Community Mediation & Restorative Servic Es Inc fund?
By grant dollars over FY2020 to FY2023, its largest causes are Housing & Shelter (75%), Community Improvement (15%), International (5%).
Who are Community Mediation & Restorative Servic Es Inc's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2020 to FY2023: Sakan Community Resources Inc ($81k), Capi USA ($67k), Phumulani ($51k).
Does Community Mediation & Restorative Servic Es Inc fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 50% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as Community Mediation & Restorative Servic Es Inc?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include The Minneapolis Foundation, Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation, Otto Bremer Trust.
Where is Community Mediation & Restorative Servic Es Inc based?
Community Mediation & Restorative Servic Es Inc is based in MN.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $7k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Community Mediation & Restorative Servic Es’ filings →

More from the funding graph