Loading…
Loading…
Minnesota · Nonprofit
PHUMULANI (Minnesota) is funded by 16 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $652,322 in grants to it, the largest being HRK FOUNDATION ($130,015). 7 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
PHUMULANI's funding base is broadening — from 3 funders to 4 as grant income climbed.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 224 social science nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2020
The base broadened — 3 funders to 4 as grant income moved $70k → $73k.
4 of 16 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 29% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of PHUMULANI’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 15 of 16 funders by total. Association, not causation.
PHUMULANI has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 20% of grant income, and it takes 4 funders to reach half.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 4 funders to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2020 57% · 2021 37% · 2022 31% · 2023 42% · 2024 47% · 2025 42% — diversifying over time.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
18% of PHUMULANI's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 44% give in more than one year at all.
Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year.
PHUMULANI is locally rooted: 93% of its grant income comes from Minnesota funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 16 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
68% of spending goes to programs.
Operates in 1 state
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2020 (financials across 2020–2020), and the filings of 16funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing