Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Community Housing Trust

The primary purpose of the COMMUNITY HOUSING TRUST is to provide housing for homeless persons through (I) acquiring or facilitating the acquisition of residential property or (ii) leasing or facilitating the leasing of residential property.

$108k
Granted FY2022
3
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172022.

Housing & Shelter$533k
02FY2022 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2022

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $58k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$33,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WANDA ALSTON FOUNDATION$50,000
COMMUNITY OF HOPE INC$33,000
LYDIA'S HOUSE$25,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–22, $170k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HOMELESS CHILDREN'S PLAYTIME PROJECT: $50k → 14%STREET SENSE MEDIA: $10k → 14%LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF THE NATIONAL CAPITAL AREA INC: $10k → 14%PATHWAYS TO HOUSING: $5k → 14%LYDIA'S HOUSE: $50k → 14%LYDIA'S HOUSE: $25k → 14%COVENANT HOUSE WASHINGTON: $10k → 14%COVENANT HOUSE WASHINGTON: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$458k · 6 repeat orgs$75k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +82% since the first grant, against +67% for the ones you funded once.

6 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2022, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
4

Total granted

$458k
$75k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+82%
+67%

Still filing today

83%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FP
    Friendship Place
    2× · 2017–2018 · $170k · revenue +104%
  • WA
    WANDA ALSTON FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2020–2022 · $110k · revenue +82%
  • LH
    LYDIA'S HOUSE IN SOUTHEAST
    2× · 2021–2022 · $75k · revenue +112%

Funded once

  • HC
    HOMELESS CHILDREN'S PLAYTIME PROJECT
    one grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue -31%
  • SS
    Street Sense Incgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +67%
  • LS
    LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES NATIONAL CAPITAL AREAINCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +199%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Central City Hospitality House

Hospitality House is a progressive, community-based organization located in San Francisco's Tenderloin, Sixth Street Corridor, and Mid-Market neighborhoods, founded nearly 60 years ago in 1967 by community volunteers during the City's…

2
Woodley House Inc

Woodley house enables district of columbia residents with mental health disorders to live full and healthy lives with dignity by providing supportive housing and services.

Health
3
Samaritan House Inc

Samaritan House is committed to fostering personal safety, growth, and self-sufficiency in adults and their children through freedom from domestic violence, sexual assault, and human trafficking and removing their risks of homelessness.

Housing & Shelter
4
House of Ruth

House of ruth helps women, children and families in greatest need and with very limited resources to build safe, stable lives and achieve their highest potential. serving the district of columbia since 1976, house of ruth provides…

Housing & Shelter
5
Everyone Home Dc

We support the holistic needs of individuals and families at risk of or experiencing homelessness. Housing is our starting point. Seeing people thrive is our finish line.

Human Services
6
Covenant House

In 34 cities across five countries, covenant house builds bridges to hope for young people facing homelessness and survivors of human trafficking. we meet their immediate needs for food, clothing, protection, and medical and mental health…

Human Services
7
Lasa

LASA is a community supported agency committed to the prevention of both homelessness and recurrent homelessness.

8
Committee for Dignity and Fairness for the Homeless Housing Development

Dignity Housing's mission is to break the cycle of homelessness and poverty that confronts low-income families and individuals in the City of Philadelphia.

9
SupportWorks Housing

We end homelessness by providing permanent housing and supportive services.

10
Lydia Place

To disrupt the cycle of homelessness and nurture healing and belonging for current & future generations.

11
Christ House

Christ House provides 24-hour comprehensive and compassionate care for people experiencing homelessness with acute medical needs in the District of Columbia and offers assistance in addressing critical issues to help break the cycle of…

Housing & Shelter
12
Covenant House Georgia Inc

Covenant house georgia provides shelters, protects and advocates on behalf of homeless, trafficked, runaway and sexually exploited youth.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pathways to Housing Dc and the most unlike its peers is Lydia's House in Southeast. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
9/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Friendship Place — $170,000 · Housing & ShelterFriendship PlaceWANDA ALSTON FOUNDATION INC — $110,000 · Housing & ShelterWANDA ALSTON FOUNDATION INCLYDIA'S HOUSE IN SOUTHEAST — $75,000 · Human ServicesLYDIA'S HOUSE IN SOUTHEASTHOMELESS CHILDREN'S PLAYTIME PROJECT — $50,000 · Human ServicesHOMELESS CHILDREN'S PLAYTIME PROJECTCOVENANT HOUSE WASHINGTON DC — $20,000 · Human ServicesCOVENANT HOUSE WASHINGTON DCStreet Sense Inc — $10,000 · Human ServicesStreet Sense IncLUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES NATIONAL CAPITAL AREAINC — $10,000 · Human ServicesLUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES NATIONAL CA…+1 more — $5,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY OF HOPE — $58,000 · Community ImprovementCOMMUNITY OF…CASA RUBY INC — $25,000 · Other
Housing & Shelter$280,000Human Services$170,000Community Improvement$58,000Other$25,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFriendship Place — $170,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetWANDA ALSTON FOUNDATION INC — $110,000 over 3y, 3.6% of budgetLYDIA'S HOUSE IN SOUTHEAST — $75,000 over 2y, 8.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY OF HOPE — $58,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHOMELESS CHILDREN'S PLAYTIME PROJECT — $50,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetCASA RUBY INC — $25,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE WASHINGTON DC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetStreet Sense Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetLUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES NATIONAL CAPITAL AREAINC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPATHWAYS TO HOUSING DC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Washington Community FoundationDC17.2× affinity6 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Washington Community Foundation · Network for Good · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Community Housing Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Community Housing Trust?

    Find your warmest path to Community Housing Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $1.7M of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2022, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph