Skip to content
Community Health Network of Connecticut Inc at a glance

· Public charity

Community Health Network of Connecticut Inc

The organization improves the health of the residents of connecticut and promotes the availability of high-quality, comprehensive, cost-effective health care services to a charitable population of over 940,000 connecticut residents.

$1.2M
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$174k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Environment$6.6MHealth$2.5M
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$168,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$57M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
STAYWELL HEALTH CARE INC$174,000
GENERATIONS FAMILY HEALTH CENTER INC$174,000
CORNELL SCOTT-HILL HEALTH CORP$168,000
FAIR HAVEN COMMUNITY HEALTH CLINIC INC$168,000
SOUTHWEST COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC$168,000
CHARTER OAK HEALTH CENTER$162,000
OPTIMUS HEALTH CARE INC$162,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

None of its grants could be placed against low income need for this view.

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$7.7M · 6 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
0

Total granted

$7.7M
$0

Still filing today

100%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GF
    GENERATIONS FAMILY HEALTH CENTER
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.3M · revenue +18%
  • CS
    CORNELL SCOTT-HILL HEALTH CORPORATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.3M · revenue +103%
  • SC
    SOUTHWEST COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.3M · revenue +89%

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field
    04the grantee network

    7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    0
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    7/7
    Grantees still filing
    7/7
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    STAYWELL HEALTH CARE INC: $1,325,100 · HealthSTAYWELL HEALTH CARE INCGENERATIONS FAMILY HEALTH CENTER: $1,324,800 · HealthGENERATIONS FAMILY HEALTH CENTERCORNELL SCOTT-HILL HEALTH CORPORATION: $1,300,800 · HealthCORNELL SCOTT-HILL HEALTH CORPORATIONCHARTER OAK HEALTH CENTER INC: $1,287,300 · HealthCHARTER OAK HEALTH CENTER INCFAIR HAVEN COMMUNITY HEALTH CLINIC INC: $1,283,100 · HealthFAIR HAVEN COMMUNITY HEALTH CLINIC INCOPTIMUS HEALTH CARE INC: $1,259,400 · HealthOPTIMUS HEALTH CARE INCSOUTHWEST COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC: $1,292,100 · OtherSOUTHWEST COMMUN…
    Health$7,780,500Other$1,292,100

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSTAYWELL HEALTH CARE INC: $1,325,100 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetGENERATIONS FAMILY HEALTH CENTER: $1,324,800 over 8y, 1.4% of budgetCORNELL SCOTT-HILL HEALTH CORPORATION: $1,300,800 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetSOUTHWEST COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC: $1,292,100 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetCHARTER OAK HEALTH CENTER INC: $1,287,300 over 8y, 1.4% of budgetFAIR HAVEN COMMUNITY HEALTH CLINIC INC: $1,283,100 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetOPTIMUS HEALTH CARE INC: $1,259,400 over 8y, 0.5% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds STAYWELL HEALTH CARE INC ↗
    • Who funds GENERATIONS FAMILY HEALTH CENTER ↗
    • Who funds CORNELL SCOTT-HILL HEALTH CORPORATION ↗
    • Who funds SOUTHWEST COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
    • Who funds CHARTER OAK HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
    • Who funds FAIR HAVEN COMMUNITY HEALTH CLINIC INC ↗
    • Who funds OPTIMUS HEALTH CARE INC ↗

    Co-funders

    Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    Community Health Netw…Community Health Netw…Direct ReliefSchool-Based Health A…Harvard Pilgrim Healt…Reach Out and Read IncAmerican Cancer Socie…Amazonsmile Foundation
    Community Health Network of Connecticut Holdings IncCT20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: Community Health Network of Connecticut Holdings Inc · Community Health Network of Connecticut Foundation Inc · Direct Relief · School-Based Health Alliance · Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Foundation Inc · Reach Out and Read Inc · American Cancer Society Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

    How this is measured
    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization Community Health Network of Connecticut Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Community Health Network of Connecticut Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

    2025
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 15%
    • Charter Oak Health Center Inc: 34% of income from government
    • Fair Haven Community Health Clinic Inc: 29% of income from government
    • Optimus Health Care Inc: 16% of income from government
    • Staywell Health Care Inc: 15% of income from government
    • Generations Family Health Center: 14% of income from government
    • Cornell Scott-Hill Health Corporation: 12% of income from government
    • Southwest Community Health Center Inc: 5% of income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Community Health Network of Connecticut Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Community Health Network of Connecticut Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 7 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Community Health Network of Connecticut’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home