Skip to content

· Community foundation

Community Foundation of the Virginias Inc

To promote education, health, beautification, youth, and recreation in the greater southern west virginia and southwest virginia areas.

$937k
Granted FY2024still arriving
23
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$80k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Recreation & Sports$271kPublic Safety & Disaster$265kHuman Services$149kFood & Nutrition$148kReligion$147kArts & Culture$98kPhilanthropy$75kEducation$54kOther$0
02FY2024 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 23 grants below total $483,044, the rows itemized in this filing. The $936,670 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $453,626 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $44k
  • $10k–50k13 grants · $183k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $256k
$12,769
Median grant
3
States reached
$15M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OUTSIDE DREAMS$80,000
CLINCH VALLEY COMMUNITY ACTION JOY CAMP$75,782
CITY OF BLUEFIELD PLAYGROUND$50,000
SACRED HEART CHURCH$50,000
RICHLANDS FIRE-RESCUE (RESCUE DIVISION)$25,000
CITY OF BLUEFIELD PARKS & REC DEPT$23,915
BLUEFIELD BEAUTIFICATION COMMISSION$15,134
ABWE FOUNDATION$15,000
CHILD PROTECT OF MERCER COUNTY$14,000
HELPFUL HARVEST FOOD BANK$13,560
BLUEFIELD ARTS AND REVITALIZATION CORP$13,500
CLEARFORK VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT$12,769
CITY OF BLUEFIELD POLICE DEPT$10,000
TOWN OF BLUEFIELD POLICE DEPARTMENT$10,000
PIKEVIEW HIGH SCHOOL$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $95k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%APPALACHIAN AGENCY FOR SENIOR CITIZENS: $10k → 18%APPALACHIAN AGENCY FOR SR CITIZENS: $5k → 18%OUTSIDE DREAMS: $80k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 86% of Community Foundation of the Virginias Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 54% of the giving stays in WV; by stated purpose, 9%.

Community Foundation of the Virginias Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

56%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$822k · 24 repeat orgs$639k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +16% since the first grant, against +7% for those funded once.

24 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
28

Total granted

$822k
$325k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+7%

Still filing today

29%
18%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 35% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $313k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Community ImprovementReligionHuman ServicesArts & CultureFood & NutritionPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CP
    CHILD PROTECT OF MERCER COUNTY INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $32k · revenue +64%
  • WH
    World Help
    2× · 2017–2021 · $30k · revenue +16%
  • AS
    APPALACHIAN SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
    2× · 2023–2024 · $18k · revenue +58%

Funded once

  • CV
    CLINCH VALLEY COMMUNITY ACTION GROUP INC
    one grant, 2022 · $29k
  • TM
    TENDER MERCIES MINISTRIES OF PRINCETON
    one grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue +7%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Heritage Farm Foundation
Philanthropy
2
Appalachian Sustainable Agriculture Project

To help local farms thrive, link farmers to markets and supporters, and build healthy communities through connections to local food.

Environment
3
Hardy County Tour & Craft Association

Preserve historic buildings and customs

—
4
Wv Helping Hands
Human Services
5
Greater Greenbrier Long-Term Recovery Committee

To ensure the safety and wellbeing of Greenbrier Valley citizens in all phases of disaster.

—
6
Keyser-Mineral County Library Assoc

Public library

Education
7
Fauquier Heritage and Preservation Foundation Inc

To foster the historical and genealogical heritage of fauquier county, virginia.

Arts & Culture
8
Aspire Appalachia Inc

Community development

Animals
9
Historic Beverly Preservation Inc

Preservation of historic structures and public education as to the area history in the town of beverly, wv.

Arts & Culture
10
Appalachia Reach Out

Lead the lost to a saving knowledge of Jesus Christ by showing Christ's love through assisting people with spiritual, physical and economic needs, that they may become disciples in partnership with local churches to carry out the great…

Human Services
11
Appalachian African American Cultural Center
Arts & Culture
12
Alpine Heritage Preservation Inc

Restoration of an historic opera house and to provide a venue for arts and events in Thomas, WV.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Historic Crab Orchard Museum & Pioneer Park Inc; the most unlike its peers is Outside Dreams Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 62 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/16
Grantees still filing
8/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $90,660 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSACRED HEART FOOD PANTRY: $86,451 · OtherSACRED HEART FOOD PANTRYCLINCH VALLEY COMMUNITY ACTION JOY CAMP: $75,782 · OtherCLINCH VALLEY COMMUNITY ACTION JOY CAMPABWE FOUNDATION INC: $74,500 · OtherABWE FOUNDATION INCBLUEFIELD BEAUTIFICATION COMMISSION: $67,862 · OtherBLUEFIELD BEAUTIFICATION COMMISSIONRICHLANDS FIRE-RESCUE (RESCUE DIVISION): $51,734 · OtherSACRED HEART CHURCH: $50,000 · OtherCITY OF BLUEFIELD PLAYGROUND: $50,000 · OtherABWE: $40,000 · Other+41 more: $545,485 · Other+41 moreOUTSIDE DREAMS INC: $80,000 · Human ServicesAPPALACHIAN AGENCY FOR SR CITIZENS: $15,164 · Human ServicesHEAVEN SENT MINISTRIES INC: $41,000 · ReligionWorld Help: $30,000 · ReligionHelpful Harvest Food Bank: $41,560 · Food & NutritionTENDER MERCIES MINISTRIES OF PRINCETON: $20,000 · Food & NutritionAPPALACHIAN SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT: $17,500 · Community ImprovementBRAMWELL FOUNDATION: $15,000 · Community ImprovementBLUEWELL IMPROVEMENT ASSOCIATION: $6,000 · Community ImprovementCHILD PROTECT OF MERCER COUNTY INC: $31,669 · Crime & LegalBLUEFIELD ARTS AND REVITALIZATION CORPORATION: $20,500 · Arts & CultureHISTORIC CRAB ORCHARD MUSEUM & PIONEER PARK INC: $10,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$1,132,474Human Services$95,164Religion$71,000Food & Nutrition$61,560Community Improvement$38,500Crime & Legal$31,669Arts & Culture$30,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOUTSIDE DREAMS INC: $80,000 over 1y, 53% of budgetHelpful Harvest Food Bank: $41,560 over 3y, 22% of budgetHEAVEN SENT MINISTRIES INC: $41,000 over 2y, 7.2% of budgetCHILD PROTECT OF MERCER COUNTY INC: $31,669 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetWorld Help: $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBLUEFIELD ARTS AND REVITALIZATION CORPORATION: $20,500 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetTENDER MERCIES MINISTRIES OF PRINCETON: $20,000 over 1y, 6.2% of budgetAPPALACHIAN SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT: $17,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetAPPALACHIAN AGENCY FOR SR CITIZENS: $15,164 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHISTORIC CRAB ORCHARD MUSEUM & PIONEER PARK INC: $10,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetTAZEWELL COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetPRINCETON RESCUE SQUAD INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPOSTPARTUM SUPPORT VIRGINIA INC: $7,500 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetALLIANCE FOR THE ARTS LTD: $7,016 over 1y, 4.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds OUTSIDE DREAMS INC ↗
  • Who funds Helpful Harvest Food Bank ↗
  • Who funds HEAVEN SENT MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILD PROTECT OF MERCER COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds World Help ↗
  • Who funds BLUEFIELD ARTS AND REVITALIZATION CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds TENDER MERCIES MINISTRIES OF PRINCETON ↗
  • Who funds APPALACHIAN SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT ↗
  • Who funds APPALACHIAN AGENCY FOR SR CITIZENS ↗
  • Who funds BRAMWELL FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Hugh I Shott Jr Foundation IncWV20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Hugh I Shott Jr Foundation Inc · The H P and Anne S Hunnicutt Foundation · Frank Litz Smoot Charitable Trust · The Pace Family Foundation Inc · K B Tierney Charitable Foundation Trust · Skewes Family Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Community Foundation of the Virginias Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Community Foundation of the Virginias Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 62 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Community Foundation of the Virginias’ filings →

    More from the funding graph