· Community foundation
Community Foundation of Grand Forks East Grand Forks and Region
To connect people who care with causes that matter.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 35 grants below total $1,000,693 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,137,110 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $136,417 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k5 grants · $37k
- $10k–50k25 grants · $514k
- $50k–250k5 grants · $449k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PARK RIVER ND PARKS & REC | $148,038 |
| GRAND FORKS CHILDREN'S MUSEUM | $95,500 |
| UNIVERSITY OF NORTH DAKOTA GRANT & CONTRACT ACCOUNTING | $75,000 |
| NORTHLANDS RESCUE MISSION | $68,345 |
| LOVE IN ACTION | $62,294 |
| GRAND FORKS FOUNDATION FOR EDUCATION | $46,000 |
| NORTHERN VALLEY YOUTH ORCHESTRAS | $44,818 |
| GRAND CITIES CHILDREN'S CHOIR | $30,865 |
| Y FAMILY CENTER | $30,000 |
| ALTRU HEALTH FOUNDATION | $30,000 |
| CIRCLE OF FRIENDS HUMANE SOCIETY | $27,704 |
| UNSEEN MINISTRIES | $25,000 |
| GREATER GRAND FORKS SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA | $23,855 |
| ARTWISE | $22,076 |
| COMMUNITY VIOLENCE INTERVENTION CENTER | $20,853 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $343k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 85% of Community Foundation of Grand Forks East Grand Forks and Region’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 90% of the giving stays in ND; read by stated purpose it is 14% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +65% since the first grant, against +37% for the ones you funded once.
50 repeat relationships — 27 still active in FY2024, 23 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $128k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NRNORTHLANDS RESCUE MISSION INC8× · 2017–2024 · $389k · revenue +21%
- GFGRAND FORKS FOUNDATION FOR EDUCATION INC8× · 2017–2024 · $350k · revenue +67%
- GFGRAND FORKS CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC3× · 2022–2024 · $281k · revenue +540%
Funded once
- DDDOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATIONone grant, 2019 · $65k
- MPMENDENHALL PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHone grant, 2017 · $53k
- SLSHARON LUTHERAN CHURCHone grant, 2019 · $35k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Promote economic growth in grand forks, north dakota and the surrounding communities through the attraction of new industries and expansion of current businesses.
Building enduring relationships that maximize advocacy and philanthropy to support North Dakota State University.
The organization's mission is to provide permanently affordable housing opportunities to the grand forks, nd community.
End hunger together.
Engages, equips and empowers learners to explore their vocations, fulfill their potential and serve the world.
The northland foundation supports northeastern minnesota people and communities working toward a future where everyone feels they belong and can thrive.
Southeastern north dakota community action agency (sendcaa) was formed in 1965 to provide a range of services and activities in a six county area designed to alleviate poverty and give low-income people the opportunity to improve their…
Guided by our values, Catholic Charities North Dakota serves people in need and advocates for the common good of all.
The greater north dakota chamber of commerce works on behalf of our members to advocate for a positive business climate.
The greater fargo moorhead economic development corporation (gfmedc) is a catalyst for economic growth and prosperity. using a comprehensive approach to economic development, the gfmedc accelerates job and wealth creation in cass county,…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Grand Forks Foundation for Education Inc and the most unlike its peers is Saint Gianna and Pietro Molla Maternity Home Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 26. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 17% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 9% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 7% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
58 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 58 of the 84 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NORTHLANDS RESCUE MISSION INC ↗
- Who funds GRAND FORKS FOUNDATION FOR EDUCATION INC ↗
- Who funds GRAND FORKS CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds Northern Valley Youth Orchestras ↗
- Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
- Who funds GRAND FORKS DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIA ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GRAND FORKS EAST GRAND FORKS AND REGION ↗
- Who funds ARTWISE ↗
- Who funds GREATER GF SYMPHONY ASSN ↗
- Who funds EMPIRE ARTS CENTER ↗
- Who funds NORTH DAKOTA MUSEUM OF ART ↗
- Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF GRAND FORKS DBA CIRCLE OF FRIENDS ANIMAL SHELTER ↗
- Who funds ALTRU HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PEMBINA GORGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds EVOLVE ND ↗
- Who funds WOMENS PREGNANCY CENTER ↗
- Who funds RIVERSIDE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds GRAND FORKS PARKS AND RECREATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UND Alumni Association and Foundation ↗
- Who funds GREATER GRAND FORKS COMMUNITY THEATRE ↗
- Who funds SUNSHINE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY VIOLENCE INTERVENTION CENTER ↗
- Who funds Saint Gianna and Pietro Molla Maternity Home Inc ↗
- Who funds NORTH DAKOTA BALLET COMPANY ↗
- Who funds PULSE OUTREACH ↗
- Who funds LOVE IN ACTION ↗
- Who funds UNSEEN ↗
- Who funds Sacred Heart Foundation ↗
- Who funds Public Arts Commission ↗
- Who funds ALTRU HEALTH SYSTEM ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Myra Foundation · Midcontinent Foundation · Blue Cross Blue Shield of North Dakota Caring Foundation · North Dakota Community Foundation · Altru Health System · Botsford Family Foundation · The Hal and Kathleen Gershman Family Foundation · Dakota Medical Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · United Way of Grand Forks East Grand Forks and the Area Inc · Otto Bremer Trust · Fargo-Moorhead Area Foundation Corporation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Community Foundation of Grand Forks East Grand Forks and Region funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Community Foundation of Grand Forks East Grand Forks and Region?
Find your warmest path to Community Foundation of Grand Forks East Grand Forks and Region through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.