Skip to content

· Community foundation

Community Foundation for Oceana County

To enhance the lives of the people of oceana county by leading, promoting and channeling philanthropy to connect resources with needs.

$3.0M
Granted FY2025still arriving
22
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$1.9M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Public Benefit$4.3MArts & Culture$353kMembership Benefit$341kHuman Services$324kHealth$239kEducation$231kCommunity Improvement$165kPublic Safety & Disaster$119kOther$0
02FY2025 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 22 grants below total $2,429,268, the rows itemized in this filing. The $2,982,831 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $553,563 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $175k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $367k
  • $250k+1 grant · $1.9M
$13,923
Median grant
1
States reached
$24M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SHELBY TOWNSHIP$1,856,725
TRINITY LUTHERAN CHURCH$115,000
SHELBY PUBLIC SCHOOLS$110,940
OCEANA COUNTY HISTORICAL AND GENEALOGICAL SOCIETY$80,820
THE LADDER COMMUNITY CENTER$60,000
OCEANA COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT$22,000
OCEANA COUNTY MEDICAL CARE FACILITY$21,261
PENTWATER HISTORICAL SOCIETY$19,940
TRINITY HEALTH OFFICE OF PHILANTHROPY MUSKEGON & THE LAKESHORE$16,607
BENZIE COUNTY CENTRAL SCHOOLS$15,000
NEW ERA CHRISTIAN SCHOOL$13,923
WALKERVILLE PUBLIC SCHOOLS$13,650
HESPERIA COMMUNITY SCHOOLS$13,000
LAKESHORE CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER$10,100
FOUNTAIN HILL COUNSELING CENTER$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $151k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%COMMUNITIES OVERCOMING VIOLENT ENCOUNTERS: $15k → 10%COMMUNITIES OVERCOMING VIOLENT ENCOUNTERS: $10k → 10%OCEANA COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $67k → 16%CRYSTAL VALLEY CARE FUND: $16k → 16%OCEANA COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $7k → 16%OCEANA COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $7k → 16%CRYSTAL VALLEY CARE FUND: $6k → 16%LOVE INC OF OCEANA COUNTY: $8k → 16%LOVE IN THE NAME OF CHRIST OF OCEANA COUNTY: $7k → 16%STONY LAKE THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER: $9k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 66% of Community Foundation for Oceana County’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Community Foundation for Oceana Countylessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$8.3M · 27 repeat orgs$457k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +17% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

27 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
24

Total granted

$8.3M
$376k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
0%

Still filing today

44%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $80k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthPhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementEducationEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TL
    THE LADDER COMMUNITY CENTER
    5× · 2021–2025 · $242k · revenue +22%
  • OC
    OCEANA COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING
    3× · 2020–2024 · $80k · revenue +28%
  • TM
    THE MARRIAGE & FAMILY CENTER
    4× · 2020–2025 · $39k · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • MH
    MERCY HEALTH LAKESHORE CAMPUS
    2× · 2021–2022 · $121k
  • HC
    HART COMMUNITY PERFORMING ARTS ASSOCIATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $45k · revenue +26%
  • CF
    COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR OCEANA COUNTY
    2× · 2021–2022 · $33k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Midmichigan Health Services

To provide high quality community-oriented, patient-centered health services for all.

Health
2
Oceana County Housing Commission Nonprofit Corporation

The purpose of the oceana county housing commission nonprofit corporation is to provide decent, safe, affordable, and sanitary housing opportunities for low and moderate income residents of oceana county, michigan. the oceana county…

Housing & Shelter
3
Traverse City Center of Entrepreneurship

To cultivate a thriving and connected startup ecosystem in nw lower michigan.

—
4
Oscoda County Council On Aging

Organized exclusively to plan, operate and coordinate programs, public and private, to promote and safeguard the independence, care, well-being, and security for senior citizens and elderly in oscoda county, michigan.

—
5
Macomb County Chamber of Commerce

The organization's mission is to promote a healthy business climate for its members and all businesses in macomb county, michigan.

Unclassified
6
Michigan Chamber of Commerce

To promote conditions favorable to job creation and business success in michigan.

—
7
United Way of Midland County

To improve lives by mobilizing the caring power of the Midland community through leadership, collaboration, volunteerism and charitable fundraising.

—
8
Michigan West Coast Chamber of Commerce

The west coast chamber exists to be a catalyst for business growth and development, a convener of leaders and influencers, and a champion for a thriving community.

—
9
Manistee County Council On Aging

Provide services for senior citizens both through the center and to those with limited resources or homebound.

Human Services
10
Michigan Center of Accountability for Republicans

Social welfare and issue advocacy

Civil Rights
11
Land Conservancy of West Michigan

Our mission is conserving West Michigans ecologically critical land. We protect land by creating public nature preserves, providing support to communities and local governments in creating natural areas, and helping private landowners…

Environment
12
Saginaw County Chamber of Commerce

To be a catalyst for economic and community progress within the great lakes bay region.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mid Michigan Community Action Agency Inc; the most unlike its peers is Benzie Central Schools Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 60 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/26
Grantees still filing
11/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OCEANA COUNTY: $4,394,282 · OtherOCEANA COUNTYSHELBY TOWNSHIP: $2,222,554 · OtherSHELBY TOWNSHIPOCEANA COUNTY HISTORICAL & GENEALOGICAL SOCIETY: $366,668 · Other+41 more: $1,189,948 · Other+41 moreTHE LADDER COMMUNITY CENTER: $242,200 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF THE LAKESHORE: $34,492 · PhilanthropyTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE HOLLAND/ZEELAND AREA INC: $30,960 · PhilanthropyOCEANA COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $80,368 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITIES OVERCOMING VIOLENT ENCO: $24,962 · Human ServicesCrystal Valley Care Fund: $21,820 · Human ServicesLOVE INC: $15,017 · Human ServicesSTONY LAKE THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER: $9,300 · Human ServicesTRINITY HEALTH - MICHIGAN: $37,911 · HealthTRINITY HEALTH CORPORATION: $16,607 · HealthDISABILITY NETWORK WEST MICHIGAN: $7,895 · HealthMENTAL HEALTH FOUNDATION OF WEST MICHIGAN: $5,375 · HealthWEST CENTRAL MICHIGAN HORTICULTURAL RESEARCH INC: $51,880 · EnvironmentHART COMMUNITY PERFORMING ARTS ASSOCIATION: $45,142 · Arts & CultureCOMMUNITY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION OF MICHIGAN: $20,000 · Community ImprovementOCEANA COUNTY ECONOMIC ALLIANCE: $5,100 · Community Improvement
Other$8,173,452Philanthropy$307,652Human Services$151,467Health$67,788Environment$51,880Arts & Culture$45,142Community Improvement$25,100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOCEANA COUNTY HISTORICAL & GENEALOGICAL SOCIETY: $366,668 over 4y, 91% of budgetTHE LADDER COMMUNITY CENTER: $242,200 over 5y, 22% of budgetOCEANA COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $80,368 over 3y, 3.6% of budgetNEW ERA CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $61,952 over 5y, 3.4% of budgetWEST CENTRAL MICHIGAN HORTICULTURAL RESEARCH INC: $51,880 over 2y, 4.6% of budgetTHE MARRIAGE & FAMILY CENTER: $38,524 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetTRINITY HEALTH - MICHIGAN: $37,911 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPENTWATER HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $35,206 over 2y, 7.8% of budgetUNITED WAY OF THE LAKESHORE: $34,492 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE HOLLAND/ZEELAND AREA INC: $30,960 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITIES OVERCOMING VIOLENT ENCO: $24,962 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION OF MICHIGAN: $20,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTRINITY HEALTH CORPORATION: $16,607 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOVE INC: $15,017 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetLAKESHORE CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER: $10,100 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetDISABILITY NETWORK WEST MICHIGAN: $7,895 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetMID MICHIGAN COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC: $6,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFEEDING AMERICA WEST MICHIGAN: $5,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMENTAL HEALTH FOUNDATION OF WEST MICHIGAN: $5,375 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetOCEANA COUNTY ECONOMIC ALLIANCE: $5,100 over 1y, 4.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds OCEANA COUNTY HISTORICAL & GENEALOGICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds THE LADDER COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds OCEANA COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING ↗
  • Who funds NEW ERA CHRISTIAN SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds WEST CENTRAL MICHIGAN HORTICULTURAL RESEARCH INC ↗
  • Who funds HART COMMUNITY PERFORMING ARTS ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds THE MARRIAGE & FAMILY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds TRINITY HEALTH - MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds PENTWATER HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF THE LAKESHORE ↗
  • Who funds THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE HOLLAND/ZEELAND AREA INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITIES OVERCOMING VIOLENT ENCO ↗
  • Who funds Crystal Valley Care Fund ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION OF MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds TRINITY HEALTH CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds LOVE INC ↗
  • Who funds BENZIE CENTRAL SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds LAKESHORE CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds READ MUSKEGON ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation for Muskegon CountyMI42× affinity18 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Muskegon County · Consumers Energy Foundation · Fremont Area Community Foundation · William R Lathers Charitable Trust · Seneca Foods Foundation · The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation · Michigan Health Endowment Fund · DTE Energy Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Community Foundation for Oceana County funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Community Foundation for Oceana County. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Community Foundation for Oceana County?

    Find your warmest path to Community Foundation for Oceana County through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 60 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Community Foundation for Oceana County’s filings →

    More from the funding graph