Skip to content

· Public charity

Communities in Schools

Surround students with a community of support and empower them to stay in school and achieve in life.

$4.5M
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
10
States reached
$1.7M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$9.1MEmployment$301kYouth Development$274kPhilanthropy$228kCommunity Improvement$158kHuman Services$124k
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $50k–250k6 grants · $852k
  • $250k+6 grants · $3.6M
$257,044
Median grant
10
States reached
$99M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WEST VIRGINIA STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION$1,745,136
PASADENA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT$611,839
LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT$376,428
SANTA ANA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT$331,164
MONTGOMERY COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION$281,875
PORTLAND PUBLIC SCHOOLS$257,044
JACKSON PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT$236,840
VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA OF NORTH LOUISIANA$191,910
NORTHEAST TEXAS COMMUNITY COLLEGE$158,418
GROWING TOGETHER$123,734
NEWARK BOARD OF EDUCATION$71,119
SUPPORTERS OF TEXAS STUDENTS SUCCESS$70,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $687k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%GROWING TOGETHER: $124k → 15%THRIVE CHICAGO: $345k → 14%THRIVE CHICAGO: $150k → 14%THRIVE CHICAGO: $69k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
IL
WI
OR
OH
PA
NJ
CA
WV
VA
AR
TN
DC
OK
LA
MS
AL
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

55%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.5M · 15 repeat orgs$4.6M to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
14

Total granted

$5.5M
$587k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+50%

Still filing today

67%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 11% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4.0M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’21’22’23’24
PhilanthropyEducationHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF THE GREATER LEHIGH VALLEY
    4× · 2018–2021 · $803k · revenue +90%
  • LT
    LEARN TO EARN DAYTON
    4× · 2018–2021 · $776k · revenue +287%
  • SI
    StriveTogether Inc
    5× · 2017–2021 · $535k · revenue +735%

Funded once

  • BO
    BOARD OF EDUCATION OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY EMPLOYEE BENEFIT TRUST FUND
    one grant, 2023 · $109k · revenue +22%
  • AA
    American Association of School Administrators Incgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $100k · revenue +59%
  • NT
    NORTHEAST TEXAS COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2023 · $79k · revenue +5%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Tennessee State Collaborative On Reforming Education

The mission of the state collaborative on reforming education (score) is to catalyze transformative change in tennessee education so that all students can achieve success. score is an independent, nonprofit, and nonpartisan institution,…

Education
2
United Way of North Central New Mexico

Uwncnm's mission is to connect people to opportunities and services to equitably improve lives and strengthen communities. that is done through direct service programs, community investment (grant making), community outreach (convening and…

Philanthropy
3
National Institute for Excellence in Teaching

Building educator excellence to give all students the opportunity for success.

Education
4
Collaborative for Academic Social and Emotional Learning

Casel is a trusted source for knowledge about high-quality, evidence-based social and emotional learning (sel). our mission is to help make evidence-based social and emotional learning (sel) an integral part of education from preschool to…

Youth Development
5
The Campbell Institute

Children's institute's mission is to leverage research, practice, policy, and advocacy to shift systems toward justice for families so that all of oregon's children, prenatal to grade 5, have access to opportunity.

Unclassified
6
Council of the Great City Schools

See schedule o, page 45.founded in 1956 and incorporated in 1961, the purpose of the council of the great city schools (the council) is to represent the needs, challenges, and successes of major-city public school districts and their…

—
7
Knowledgeworks Foundation

We help our partners in states and schools work together to align policy and practice, reimagining what education can do through personalized, competency-based learning - and what it must do to prepare students for a lifetime of learning.

Education
8
Center for the Future of Arizona

Bringing arizonans together to create a stronger and brighter future for our state.

Community Improvement
9
Austin Partners in Education

Apie provides college and career readiness support through individualized academic and mentoring programs to prepare students for success.

Education
10
Chicago Public Education Fund

The chicago public education fund (the fund) is a nonprofit organization that improves public schools in chicago by investing in the talented educators who lead them.

Education
11
The Nashville Chamber Public Benefit Foundation

The nashville chamber public benefit foundation supports the work of the nashville area chamber of commerce through efforts to improve the quality of education, encourage public and private efforts around education, and to facilitate the…

—
12
Communities in Schools of Central Texas

Communities in schools of central texas (cisct) ensures students have holistic support, removing academic and nonacademic barriers to their success in school.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Dc Public Education Fund; the most unlike its peers is Board of Education of Montgomery County Employee Benefit Trust Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
11/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WEST VIRGINIA STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION: $1,745,136 · OtherWEST VIRGINIA STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATIONPASADENA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT: $611,839 · OtherPASADENA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICTSANTA ANA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT: $499,692 · OtherSANTA ANA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICTLITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT: $376,428 · OtherLITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICTMONTGOMERY COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION: $281,875 · OtherPORTLAND PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $257,044 · OtherJACKSON PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT: $236,840 · OtherTexas Education Agency: $236,000 · OtherMalcolm X Shabazz High School: $208,033 · OtherVOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA INC: $191,910 · Other+14 more: $877,780 · Other+14 moreUNITED WAY OF THE GREATER LEHIGH VALLEY: $802,959 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF THE GRE…StriveTogether Inc: $535,296 · PhilanthropyStriveTogether IncUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL ALABAMA INC: $168,865 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL…UNITED WAY OF GREATER MILWAUKEE & WAUKESHA COUNTY INC: $168,565 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF GREATER…Central Valley Community Foundation A Corporation: $147,700 · PhilanthropyCentral Valley Commun…NORTHEAST TEXAS COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $79,030 · Philanthropy+1 more: $13,516 · PhilanthropyLEARN TO EARN DAYTON: $776,106 · EducationLEARN TO EARN DAYTONINSTITUTE FOR EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP: $527,777 · EducationINSTITUTE FOR EDUCATI…SUPPORTERS OF TEXAS STUDENTS SUCCESS: $328,000 · EducationSUPPORTERS OF TEXAS S…DC PUBLIC EDUCATION FUND: $168,073 · EducationDC PUBLIC EDUCATION F…American Association of School Administrators Inc: $100,000 · EducationTHRIVE CHICAGO NFP: $563,584 · Human ServicesGROWING TOGETHER INC: $123,734 · Human ServicesSEARCH INSTITUTE: $204,867 · Community Improvement
Other$5,522,577Philanthropy$1,915,931Education$1,899,956Human Services$687,318Community Improvement$204,867

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNITED WAY OF THE GREATER LEHIGH VALLEY: $802,959 over 4y, 2.4% of budgetLEARN TO EARN DAYTON: $776,106 over 4y, 24% of budgetTHRIVE CHICAGO NFP: $563,584 over 4y, 8.7% of budgetStriveTogether Inc: $535,296 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP: $527,777 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetSEARCH INSTITUTE: $204,867 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL ALABAMA INC: $168,865 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER MILWAUKEE & WAUKESHA COUNTY INC: $168,565 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetDC PUBLIC EDUCATION FUND: $168,073 over 2y, 4.3% of budgetCentral Valley Community Foundation A Corporation: $147,700 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetGROWING TOGETHER INC: $123,734 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetBOARD OF EDUCATION OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY EMPLOYEE BENEFIT TRUST FUND: $108,750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Association of School Administrators Inc: $100,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetNORTHEAST TEXAS COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $79,030 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION FCOE INC: $13,516 over 1y, 1.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF THE GREATER LEHIGH VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds LEARN TO EARN DAYTON ↗
  • Who funds THRIVE CHICAGO NFP ↗
  • Who funds StriveTogether Inc ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE FOR EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP ↗
  • Who funds SUPPORTERS OF TEXAS STUDENTS SUCCESS ↗
  • Who funds SEARCH INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL ALABAMA INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREATER MILWAUKEE & WAUKESHA COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds DC PUBLIC EDUCATION FUND ↗
  • Who funds Central Valley Community Foundation A Corporation ↗
  • Who funds GROWING TOGETHER INC ↗
  • Who funds BOARD OF EDUCATION OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY EMPLOYEE BENEFIT TRUST FUND ↗
  • Who funds American Association of School Administrators Inc ↗
  • Who funds NORTHEAST TEXAS COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA OF NORTH LOUISIANA MCADOO SERVICES CORP ↗
  • Who funds THE FOUNDATION FCOE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Gates FoundationWA25.3× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Gates Foundation · Share Our Strength · GenYOUTH Incorporated · The Wallace Foundation · Project Lead the Way Inc · Save The Children Federation Inc · Save the Music Foundation · The Mr Holland's Opus Foundation · Round It Up America Inc · World Vision Inc · Strider Education Foundation Inc · Digital Promise Global

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Communities in Schools funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Communities in Schools. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 9%
  • Growing Together Inc: 9% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Communities in Schools’ filings →

More from the funding graph