· Public charity
Columbus Citizens Foundation Inc
To perpetuate & honor significance of the disocvery of america by christopher columbus.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 12 grants below total $130,500 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,534,538 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $1,404,038 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k3 grants · $23k
- $10k–50k9 grants · $108k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE PAIDEIA INSTITUTE | $25,000 |
| ITALIAN HERITAGE & CULTURE | $12,500 |
| TUNNEL TO TOWERS | $10,500 |
| ITALIAN WELFARE LEAGUE | $10,000 |
| ITALIAN AMERICAN LEADERSHIP FORUM | $10,000 |
| FUTURES IN EDUCATION | $10,000 |
| LT DETECTIVE JOSEPH PETROSINO | $10,000 |
| COOLEY'S ANEMIA FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| MAYORS FUND TO ADVANCE NY | $10,000 |
| NATIONAL ORGANIZATION OF ITALIAN AMERICAN WOMEN | $7,500 |
| CATHOLIC FAITH NETWORK | $7,500 |
| NATIONAL ITALIAN AMERICAN FD | $7,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $85k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +26% since the first grant, against +10% for the ones you funded once.
10 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $43k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SOSONS OF ITALY FOUNDATION5× · 2018–2023 · $60k · revenue +162%
- CACOOLEY'S ANEMIA FOUNDATION6× · 2018–2024 · $59k · revenue +2%
STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION2× · 2023–2024 · $37k · revenue +50%
Funded once
- AFANDREAS FOUNDATIONone grant, 2021 · $87k · revenue -16%
- HFHERITAGE FILM PROJECTone grant, 2022 · $50k
PARTNERSHIP TO END ADDICTIONgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $50k · revenue +33%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To support cancer research, education and early detection, (cont. on schedule o)emphasizing the unique resources of italy & usa, recognizing world-class scientific excellence in medicine.
The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sons of Italy Foundation and the most unlike its peers is International Friends of Festival V. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ANDREAS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ITALIAN HERITAGE AND CULTURE COMMITTEE OF NY INC ↗
- Who funds SONS OF ITALY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COOLEY'S ANEMIA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PARTNERSHIP TO END ADDICTION ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL COLUMBUS EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ITALIAN WELFARE LEAGUE INC ↗
- Who funds A CHANCE IN LIFEINC ↗
- Who funds PAIDEIA INSTITUTE FOR HUMANISTIC STUDY ↗
- Who funds FUTURES IN EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK LANDMARKS CONSERVANCY INC ↗
- Who funds THE MAYOR'S FUND TO ADVANCE NEW YORK CITY ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL ITALIAN AMERICAN FOUNDATIONINC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL ORGANIZATION OF ITALIAN AMERICAN WOMEN INC ↗
- Who funds MARINE CORPS-LAW ENFORCEMENT FOUNDA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds IONA UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds THE VALERIE FUND ↗
- Who funds GRANTMAKERS FOR EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL FRIENDS OF FESTIVAL V ↗
- Who funds THE ITALIAN LANGUAGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Charity Navigator ↗
- Who funds BOOMER ESIASON FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds REMEMBER THE TRIANGLE FIRE COALITION INC ↗
- Who funds ALBANIAN-AMERICAN CULTURAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FDNY FOUNDATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Francesco and Mary Giambelli Foundation Inc · National Italian American Foundationinc · The Leandro P Rizzuto Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · Verizon Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Columbus Citizens Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.