Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Columbia Forest Products Foundation Inc

Assist and support employees of columbia forest products.

$1.1M
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Public Safety & Disaster$133kHealth$75kInternational$70kHuman Services$55kHousing & Shelter$37kEducation$29kFood & Nutrition$25kEmployment$20kOther$0
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 1 grants below total $30,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,057,203 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $1,027,203 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$30,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GOD'S PIT CREW$30,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–22, $123k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 92% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Nicholas County Empowerment: $55k → 18%AINSLEY'S ANGELS OF AMERICA: $10k → 10%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $28k → 16%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10k → 16%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10k → 16%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
WI
MI
PA
CA
WV
VA
KS
AR
TN
NC
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 16% of Columbia Forest Products Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 32% of the giving stays in NC; read by stated purpose it is 22% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Columbia Forest Products Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 19% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

46%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$247k · 7 repeat orgs$295k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +46% since the first grant, against +10% for the ones you funded once.

7 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
15

Total granted

$247k
$265k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
+10%

Still filing today

71%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthEducationHousing & ShelterPublic Safety & DisasterFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    5× · 2017–2022 · $83k · revenue +46%
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $25k · revenue +78%
  • FF
    FRIENDS FOR AN EARLIER BREAST CANCER TEST INC
    2× · 2019–2020 · $20k · revenue +2%

Funded once

  • NC
    NICHOLAS COUNTY EMPOWERMENT CORP
    one grant, 2018 · $55k · revenue +10%
  • IL
    Iglesia LaVina de Mayaguez
    one grant, 2018 · $50k
  • ML
    MCDOWELL LFACgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue +527%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Habitat for Humanity of Nc Inc

Seeking to put Gods love into action, Habitat for Humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope to realize our vision of a world where everyone has a decent place to live. Habitat for Humanity of North Carolina…

Housing & Shelter
2
Fort Collins Habitat for Humanity

Seeking to put god's love into action; habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities, and hope to realize our vision of a world where everyone has a decent place to live. fort collins habitat for humanity adheres…

Housing & Shelter
3
Habitat for Humanity of Wicomico County Inc

Seeking to put god's love into action, habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope to realize our vision of a world where everyone has a decent place to live. habitat for humanity wicomico adheres to a…

Housing & Shelter
4
Western Carolina Rescue Ministries Inc

Provide food, shelter, rehabilitation and christian ministry to the poor and homeless

Housing & Shelter
5
Carolina Medicorp Enterprises Inc

Mission novant health exists to improve the health of our communities, one person at a time. vision we, the novant health team, will deliver the most remarkable patient experience, in every dimension, every time. values -compassion: we…

6
Hospice of Gaston County Inc

To provide compassionate, exceptional and highly reliable care.

7
American Cancer Society Inc

Improve the lives of people with cancer and their families through advocacy, research, and patient support, to ensure everyone has an opportunity to prevent, detect, treat, and survive cancer.

Health
8
Dorchester Habitat for Humanity Inc

Dorchester habitat for humanity, inc.'s ("dhfh") mission statement is "putting god's love into action by bringing people together building homes and hope." dhfh was founded in 1993 and has built seventy-five (75) homes and three (3)…

9
Habitat for Humanity Williamson -Maury

Habitat for humanity of williamson-maury (hfhwm) seeks to put god's love into action by partnering with communites to build affordable housing, inspiring hope and life-changing stability for families through homeownership.

10
Fayettville Area Habitat for Humanity

Habitat for humanity is part of a global, nonprofit housing organization operated on christian principles that seeks to put god's love into action by building homes, communities and hope. habitat for humanity is dedicated to eliminating…

Housing & Shelter
11
Baptist Children's Homes of North Carolina Incorporated

Baptist children's homes of north carolina (bch) is a nonprofit organization that reaches out to children and families in crisis. the agency's mission statement is "sharing hope...changing lives."

Religion
12
World Hope International Inc

The purpose of world hope international, inc. (whi) includes providing assistance to economically disadvantaged people through long-term social transformation projects, including anti-trafficking protection, clean water, economic…

International

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ascension Via Christi Health Inc and the most unlike its peers is Ainsley's Angels of America. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
10/15
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Iglesia LaVina de Mayaguez — $50,000 · OtherIglesia LaVina de MayaguezCAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRIST INC — $42,400 · OtherCAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRIST INCHabitat for Humanity of Northeast Arkansas Inc — $37,000 · OtherHabitat for Humanity of Northeast Arkansas IncWESTOVER CHURCH — $20,000 · OtherWESTOVER CHURCHNICHOLAS OLD MAIN FOUNDATION INC — $15,000 · OtherNICHOLAS OLD MAIN FOUNDATION INCCHARTER TOWNSHIP OF IRONWOOD — $10,000 · OtherGLIDDEN AREA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $10,000 · OtherSHALLOW CREEK KENNELS INC — $8,500 · OtherFreedom Life Ministries — $15,000 · OtherFreedom Life MinistriesWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 · OtherBUTTE HUMANE SOCIETY — $10,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF GREATER GREENSBORO INC — $10,000 · Other+1 more — $6,144 · OtherAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $82,500 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & …NICHOLAS COUNTY EMPOWERMENT CORP — $55,000 · Human ServicesNICHOLAS COUNTY EMPOWERMENT CO…AINSLEY'S ANGELS OF AMERICA — $10,000 · Human ServicesAINSLEY'S ANGELS OF AMERICAST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $25,000 · HealthST JUDE CHI…FRIENDS FOR AN EARLIER BREAST CANCER TEST INC — $20,000 · HealthFRIENDS FOR…ASCENSION VIA CHRISTI HEALTH INC — $10,000 · HealthASCENSION V…GODS PIT CREW INC — $30,000 · Public Safety & DisasterMCDOWELL LFAC — $25,000 · Food & NutritionSHELTERED WORKSHOP OF NICHOLAS CO — $20,000 · EmploymentJUSTICE AND MERCY INTERNATIONAL — $20,000 · International
Other$244,044Human Services$147,500Health$55,000Public Safety & Disaster$30,000Food & Nutrition$25,000Employment$20,000International$20,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $82,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHabitat for Humanity of Northeast Arkansas Inc — $37,000 over 2y, 7.8% of budgetGODS PIT CREW INC — $30,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMCDOWELL LFAC — $25,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS FOR AN EARLIER BREAST CANCER TEST INC — $20,000 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetSHELTERED WORKSHOP OF NICHOLAS CO — $20,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetJUSTICE AND MERCY INTERNATIONAL — $20,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetFreedom Life Ministries — $15,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetASCENSION VIA CHRISTI HEALTH INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBUTTE HUMANE SOCIETY — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF GREATER GREENSBORO INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAINSLEY'S ANGELS OF AMERICA — $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Blackbaud Giving FundSC9.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Columbia Forest Products Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Columbia Forest Products Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Columbia Forest Products Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph