Skip to content

Illinois · Public charity

Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

$78M
Granted FY2023
2
Itemized grants FY2023
2
Organizations funded FY2023
50%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2023
$11k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2023
$5,750
Largest grant, FY2023
$5,750
Organizations funded a year
1 to 7
FY2017 to FY2023
States reached, FY2023
1
Total assets, FY2023
$430M

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 50% of the organizations Columbia College Chicago funded were first-time grantees, receiving 47% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 53% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23
EducationArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY20232$11k50%
FY20223$15k67%
FY20211$5k0%
FY20202$10k50%
FY20195$38k40%
FY20182$11k50%
FY20177$84kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Arts & Culture$149kCommunity Improvement$24k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2023, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 14 grantees
All grantees of Columbia College Chicago by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Filter Photo Nfp$36,75073%
Chicago International Film Festival Inc Cinema-Chicago$30,00012%
The Art Institute of Chicago$25,00010%
Hyde Park Art Center$15,00020%
Near South Planning Board$12,50021%
The Chicago High School for the Arts$10,00010%
Midwest Film Inc$7,0001n/a
Chicago Loop Alliance$6,25010%
Chicago Loop Alliance Foundation$5,25011%
Illinois Arts Alliance$5,10210%
Art Expositions LLC$5,0001n/a
Medium Photography Inc Dba Medium Photo$5,00017%
Grant Park Orchestral Association$5,00010%
Old Town School of Folk Music$5,00010%

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Columbia College Chicago supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFilter Photo Nfp: $36,750 over 7y, 3.3% of budgetChicago International Film Festival Inc Cinema-Chicago: $30,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetThe Art Institute of Chicago: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHyde Park Art Center: $15,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetNear South Planning Board: $12,500 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetThe Chicago High School for the Arts: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetChicago Loop Alliance: $6,250 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetChicago Loop Alliance Foundation: $5,250 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetIllinois Arts Alliance: $5,102 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMedium Photography Inc Dba Medium Photo: $5,000 over 1y, 6.6% of budgetGrant Park Orchestral Association: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOld Town School of Folk Music: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 12.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

John D and Catherine T Macarthur FoundationIL15× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · Jentes Family Foundation · Lloyd a Fry Foundation · Polk Bros Foundation Inc · Arie and Ida Crown Memorial · The Chicago Community Trust · Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · Ncrc Community Development Fund Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Columbia College Chicago with peer funders

About Columbia College Chicago

How much does Columbia College Chicago give?
Columbia College Chicago reported 2 itemized grants totaling $10,750, out of $78,381,572 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2023 IRS filing. It funded between 1 and 7 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2023.
What does Columbia College Chicago fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2023, its largest causes are Arts & Culture (86%), Community Improvement (14%).
Who are Columbia College Chicago's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2023: Filter Photo Nfp ($37k), Chicago International Film Festival Inc Cinema-Chicago ($30k), The Art Institute of Chicago ($25k).
Does Columbia College Chicago fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 50% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as Columbia College Chicago?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation, Jentes Family Foundation, Lloyd a Fry Foundation.
Where is Columbia College Chicago based?
Columbia College Chicago is based in IL.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $70M of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Columbia College Chicago’s filings →

More from the funding graph