Skip to content

· Private foundation

Coleman Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$283k
Granted FY2024still arriving
33
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$32k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Environment$177kFood & Nutrition$130kAnimals$111kScience & Tech$68kReligion$68kHealth$61kEducation$60kCivil Rights$58kOther$0
02FY2024 · 33 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k21 grants · $74k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $209k
$6,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
3RD STREET ALLIANCE$31,904
BOSTON AREA GLEANERS$25,000
HOPEWELL FUND$25,000
BOSTON HARBOR NOW$20,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD FED OF AMERICA$17,000
HUMANE SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL$17,000
CALVARY PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$15,000
TEMPLE UNIVERSITY$13,000
CORNELL LAB OF ORNITHOLOGY$12,000
XERCES SOCIETY$12,000
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN$11,000
SAN FRANCISCO-MARIN FOOD BANK$10,000
NORTH PHILLY COMMUNITY CHURCH$9,000
Individual grant recipient$9,000
EDDIE'S RANCH$8,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $28k) land where the poverty rate runs at 21%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%DC DIAPER BANK: $500 → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 14%SEAMAAC: $2k → 22%NATIONALITIES SERVICE CENTER: $5k → 22%NATIONALITIES SERVICE CENTER: $3k → 22%NATIONALITIES SERVICE CENTER: $3k → 22%NATIONALITIES SERVICE CENTER: $3k → 22%NATIONALITIES SERVICE CENTER: $2k → 22%NATIONALITIES SERVICE CENTER: $2k → 22%NATIONALITIES SERVICE CENTER: $2k → 22%NATIONALITIES SERVICE CENTER: $2k → 22%NATIONALITIES SERVICE CENTER: $2k → 22%NATIONALITIES SERVICE CENTER: $1k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
NH
NY
MA
OR
PA
CT
CA
VA
MD
AZ
NC
DC
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 16% of Coleman Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 28% of the giving stays in PA; by stated purpose, 23%.

Coleman Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$800k · 46 repeat orgs$167k to everyone else

46 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2024, 26 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

46
46

Total granted

$800k
$119k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+43%

Still filing today

63%
52%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $49k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
AnimalsEnvironmentEducationHealthHuman ServicesFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WH
    WOODS HOLE OCEANOGRAPHIC INSTITUTION
    2× · 2019–2023 · $60k · revenue +32%
  • BOSTON AREA GLEANERS INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $58k · revenue +296%
  • PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $50k · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • AH
    ANIMAL HOPE AND WELLNESS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2018 · $25k · revenue -69%
  • TK
    THE KEVIN GRAY MUSICAL ENDOW FND
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
  • TK
    THE KEVIN GRAY MUSICAL THEATER
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
2
Wildaid Inc

Wildaid's mission is to inspire change and empower the world to protect wildlife and vital habitats from critical threats.

Animals
3
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
4
Native Plant Trust Inc

The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.

Environment
5
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
6
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
7
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
8
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…

International
9
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
10
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
11
National Association of Clean Water Agencies

Nacwa is the national voice of public clean water utilities, shaping water policy, convening a vibrant peer network, and empowering water leaders.

—
12
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Philadelphia Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Twain. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

69 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 69 of the 107 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
66/69
Grantees still filing
46/69
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THOMPSON ISLAND OUTWARD BOUND: $50,000 · OtherTHOMPSON ISLAND OUTWARD BOUNDGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC: $36,000 · OtherGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INCCALVARY PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $35,000 · OtherCALVARY PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH3RD STREET ALLIANCE: $32,904 · Other3RD STREET ALLIANCEIndividual grant recipient: $21,000 · OtherWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $36,000 · OtherWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INCHOPEWELL FUND: $25,000 · OtherNATIONALITIES SERVICE CENTER OF PHILADELPHIA: $24,500 · OtherPhiladelphia Tennis Club: $20,000 · Other+66 more: $281,850 · Other+66 moreHumane World for Animals International: $39,500 · AnimalsHumane Wor…ANIMAL HOPE AND WELLNESS FOUNDATION: $25,000 · AnimalsANIMAL HOP…XERCES SOCIETY INC: $14,000 · AnimalsXERCES SOC…EDDIE'S RANCH INC: $8,000 · AnimalsEDDIE'S RA…+5 more: $7,750 · Animals+5 moreBOSTON HARBOR NOW INC: $44,000 · EnvironmentBOSTON HAR…UC GREEN INC: $15,250 · EnvironmentUC GREEN I…RARE: $11,500 · EnvironmentRARENATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $8,000 · EnvironmentNATURAL RE…INATURALIST: $5,000 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $4,750 · Environment+3 more: $5,400 · Environment+3 moreBOSTON AREA GLEANERS INC: $57,500 · Food & NutritionPhilabundance: $7,000 · Food & NutritionFeeding America: $2,500 · Food & Nutrition+1 more: $1,000 · Food & NutritionPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $50,000 · HealthRestorative Justice Project Maine: $7,000 · HealthDRUG POLICY ALLIANCE: $5,000 · HealthDoctors for America: $2,500 · Health+2 more: $2,000 · HealthWOODS HOLE OCEANOGRAPHIC INSTITUTION: $60,000 · Science & TechNEW SANCTUARY MOVEMENT OF PHILADELPHIA: $33,000 · Civil RightsNAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC: $24,000 · Civil Rights+1 more: $500 · Civil Rights
Other$562,254Animals$94,250Environment$93,900Food & Nutrition$68,000Health$66,500Science & Tech$60,000Civil Rights$57,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWOODS HOLE OCEANOGRAPHIC INSTITUTION: $60,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBOSTON AREA GLEANERS INC: $57,500 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $50,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetBOSTON HARBOR NOW INC: $44,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetHumane World for Animals International: $39,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC: $36,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $36,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNEW SANCTUARY MOVEMENT OF PHILADELPHIA: $33,000 over 5y, 3.0% of budgetHOPEWELL FUND: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANIMAL HOPE AND WELLNESS FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetNATIONALITIES SERVICE CENTER OF PHILADELPHIA: $24,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetNAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC: $24,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPhiladelphia Tennis Club: $20,000 over 7y, 3.6% of budgetSOUTHWESTERN LAW SCHOOL: $17,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUC GREEN INC: $15,250 over 3y, 9.9% of budgetXERCES SOCIETY INC: $14,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTemple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education: $13,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK: $12,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRARE: $11,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $10,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWEAVERS WAY COMMUNITY PROGRAMS: $9,500 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetWAGNER FREE INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE: $8,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $8,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEDDIE'S RANCH INC: $8,000 over 1y, 6.8% of budgetRestorative Justice Project Maine: $7,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetPhilabundance: $7,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $7,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTREE HOUSE BOOKS: $6,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINATURALIST: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPARTNERSHIP FOR PUBLIC SERVICE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDRUG POLICY ALLIANCE: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $4,750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FLEA THEATER INC: $4,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetUNIVERSITY CITY DISTRICT: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBicycle Coalition Of Greater Philadelphia: $3,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT MEOW: $2,750 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetPEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDoctors for America: $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetINNOVATION NETWORK FOR COMMUNITIES INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFeeding America: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSoi Dog Foundation USA: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR NONPROFIT NEWS: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHEAST ASIAN MUTUAL ASSISTANCE ASSOCIATIONS COALITION INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHOATE ROSEMARY HALL FOUNDATION INCORPORATED: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WOODS HOLE OCEANOGRAPHIC INSTITUTION ↗
  • Who funds BOSTON AREA GLEANERS INC ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds BOSTON HARBOR NOW INC ↗
  • Who funds Humane World for Animals International ↗
  • Who funds GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW SANCTUARY MOVEMENT OF PHILADELPHIA ↗
  • Who funds HOPEWELL FUND ↗
  • Who funds ANIMAL HOPE AND WELLNESS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NATIONALITIES SERVICE CENTER OF PHILADELPHIA ↗
  • Who funds NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds Philadelphia Tennis Club ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHWESTERN LAW SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds UC GREEN INC ↗
  • Who funds XERCES SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds Temple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education ↗
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds RARE ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds WEAVERS WAY COMMUNITY PROGRAMS ↗
  • Who funds WAGNER FREE INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE ↗
  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds EDDIE'S RANCH INC ↗
  • Who funds Restorative Justice Project Maine ↗
  • Who funds Philabundance ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds TREE HOUSE BOOKS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Coleman Resid TwPA30.6× affinity12 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Coleman Resid Tw · The Philadelphia Foundation · The William Penn Foundation · Connelly Foundation · Citizens Charitable Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Philadelphia City Fund Inc · Henrietta Tower Wurts Memorial Foundation · The Barra Foundation Inc · Henry Dolfinger 2 Trust Uw · The Cigna Group Foundation · Arbella Insurance Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Coleman Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Coleman Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 20%
  • Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution: 63% of income from government
  • Boston Harbor Now Inc: 45% of income from government
  • Xerces Society Inc: 22% of income from government
  • Greater Boston Food Bank Inc: 22% of income from government
  • Boston Area Gleaners Inc: 20% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston University: 12% of income from government
  • The Trustees of Reservations: 2% of income from government
  • Sandy Hook Promise Foundation: 0% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation: 0% of income from government
  • Choate Rosemary Hall Foundation Incorporated: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Coleman Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Coleman Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 107 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Coleman’s filings →

More from the funding graph