Skip to content

· Private foundation

Code Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$23k
Granted FY2024still arriving
15
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$11k
Largest
01What it funds
0187% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

Crime & Legal$11kFood & Nutrition$7kHuman Services$4kPhilanthropy$3kReligion$2kEducation$1kYouth Development$1kMembership Benefit$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k14 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $11k
$1,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$9k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MIAMI VALLEY CRIME STOPPERS$11,000
ELLIES RAINY DAY FUND$1,000
THE DAYTON FOODBANK$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
HOUSE OF BREAD$1,000
BOGG MOBILE FOOD PANTRY$1,000
THREADS OF MIAMI VALLEY$1,000
OPERATION VETERAN CAREGIVER$1,000
TARGET DAYTON MINISTRIES$1,000
THE VICTORY PROJECT$1,000
SHOES FOR THE SHOELESS$500
TRI-THERAPEUTIC RIDING INSTITUTE$500
DAYTON FOP YOUTH OUTDOOR ADVENTURE$500
CRAYONS TO CLASSROOMS$500
CANCER HOPE (CANCER CRUSH 5K)$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 50% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 12%TARGET DAYTON MINISTRIES: $1k → 14%OPERATION VETERAN CAREGIVER: $1k → 10%TARGET DAYTON MINISTRIES: $1k → 14%OPERATION VETERAN CAREGIVER: $1k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 41% of Code Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in OH; by stated purpose, 59%.

Code Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

27%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$12k · 6 repeat orgs$33k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
9

Total granted

$12k
$16k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+43%

Still filing today

67%
22%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 24% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $17k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24
Human ServicesAnimalsCrime & LegalFood & NutritionEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TD
    THE DAYTON FOODBANK
    3× · 2022–2024 · $3k
  • OV
    OPERATION VETERAN AND CAREGIVER SUPPORT
    2× · 2023–2024 · $2k · revenue +67%
  • HO
    HOUSE OF BREAD
    2× · 2023–2024 · $2k · revenue -21%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $11k
  • DM
    DAYTON MIAMI VALLEY AFL-CIO
    one grant, 2023 · $1k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Life & Purpose Community Resource Center

A welcoming location in the Mid Ohio Valley aimed to connect ones with resources promoting stability, independence, and help powering through information while reducing stigma surrounding accessing support.

Human Services
2
Victory Center Ministries Inc

Victory Center Ministries is dedicated to providing services for families, men, and women with children in need. Most importantly, a caring and supportive environment is provided where lives are changed and individuals regain their…

Religion
3
Victory Therapeutic Center Inc

To care for the physical, mental and emotional needs of children, adults, veterans and their families through the healing power of horses.

Health
4
Crime Victim Services Inc

To help victims prevail over the trauma of their victimization by assisting and advocating for safety, healing, justice, and restitution.

Crime & Legal
5
Ohio Victim Witness Association Inc

To be an Ohio leader for crime victims, advocates and allied professionals by promoting best practices that result in meaningful rights and quality services.

Health
6
Women Helping Women

Women helping women prevents gender-based violence and empowers all survivors.

—
7
Ohio Valley Recovery Inc

To offer support to those recovering from addictions

Human Services
8
Miami Valley Housing Opportunities Inc

Mvho works to meet the housing needs of vulnerable citizens in our community.

Housing & Shelter
9
Our Daily Bread Inc

Our Daily Bread feeds, shelters, and cares for the homeless and at-risk in our community while maintaining the dignity of our guests and offering opportunities for a new start.

Food & Nutrition
10
Southern Ohio Area Task Force on

Provide services to the victims of domestic voilence

Human Services
11
Ohio Alleycat Resource & SpayNeuter Clinic Inc

Enrich the lives of cats and communities in Greater Cincinnati by providing low-cost, high-quality spay/neuter services for ferals, strays and pets; offering trap-neuter-return and other outreach programs; and operating a no-kill adoption…

Animals
12
Save Ohio Pets

SAVE Ohio Pets is a non-profit whose mission is to reduce the homeless pet population in Central Ohio through community outreach and promoting spay/neuter, adoption, volunteering, and education. We operate a free, monthly vet care and…

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Crayons to Classrooms; the most unlike its peers is Therapeutic Riding Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
4/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MIAMI VALLEY CRIME STOPPERS INC: $11,000 · OtherMIAMI VALLEY CRIME STOPPERS INCIndividual grant recipient: $10,664 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHE DAYTON FOODBANK: $3,000 · OtherTHE DAYTON FOODBANKBOGG MOBILE FOOD PANTRY: $2,000 · OtherBOGG MOBILE FOOD PANTRY+14 more: $9,145 · Other+14 moreOPERATION VETERAN AND CAREGIVER SUPPORT: $2,000 · Human ServicesOPERATION …TARGET DAYTON MINISTRIES INC: $2,000 · Human ServicesTARGET DAY…HOUSE OF BREAD: $2,000 · Food & NutritionCRAYONS TO CLASSROOMS: $1,260 · EducationEllies Rainy Day Fund Inc: $1,000 · AnimalsTHE VICTORY PROJECT LLC: $1,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$35,809Human Services$4,000Food & Nutrition$2,000Education$1,260Animals$1,000Crime & Legal$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMIAMI VALLEY CRIME STOPPERS INC: $11,000 over 1y, 20% of budgetOPERATION VETERAN AND CAREGIVER SUPPORT: $2,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetHOUSE OF BREAD: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTARGET DAYTON MINISTRIES INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCRAYONS TO CLASSROOMS: $1,260 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEllies Rainy Day Fund Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE VICTORY PROJECT LLC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARTEMIS CENTER FOR ALTERNATIVES TO DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHERAPEUTIC RIDING INSTITUTE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYWCA Dayton: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MIAMI VALLEY CRIME STOPPERS INC ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION VETERAN AND CAREGIVER SUPPORT ↗
  • Who funds HOUSE OF BREAD ↗
  • Who funds TARGET DAYTON MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds CRAYONS TO CLASSROOMS ↗
  • Who funds Ellies Rainy Day Fund Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE VICTORY PROJECT LLC ↗
  • Who funds ARTEMIS CENTER FOR ALTERNATIVES TO DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ↗
  • Who funds THERAPEUTIC RIDING INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds YWCA Dayton ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Dayton Foundation DepositoryOH21.5× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Dayton Foundation Depository · Dayton Foundation Plus Inc · The Dayton Foundation · The Dayton Power and Light Company Foundation Dba Aes Ohio Foundation · Mathile Family Foundation · Synchrony Foundation · Virginia W Kettering Foundation Xxxxx3003 · The CareSource Foundation · The Jesse and Caryl Philips Foundation · Iddings Benevolent Trust Xxxxx5009 · WPCU Sunshine Community Fund · Gerald M & Carole a Miller Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Code Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Code Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Code Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Code Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Code’s filings →

    More from the funding graph