Skip to content

· Private foundation

Cnc Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3.4M
Granted FY2025still arriving
39
Grants FY2025still arriving
11
States reached
$1.5M
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$2.7MHousing & Shelter$1.5MReligion$1.3MInternational$808kCivil Rights$564kHuman Services$326kCommunity Improvement$223kPhilanthropy$181kOther$0
02FY2025 · 39 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k17 grants · $38k
  • $10k–50k15 grants · $388k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $320k
  • $250k+3 grants · $2.7M
$11,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets

Anchored by a single position: about 98% of reported assets are held in Costco Wholsesale Co.

Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KITP HOUSE PROJECT$1,525,000
Regents of the University of California$640,000
CALMATTERS$500,000
Californians to Defend the Open Primary$150,000
Adas Cafe$60,000
INTERVARSITY CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP$59,800
JOURNEY WITH JESUS FOUNDATION$50,000
THE SALVATION ARMY$45,700
INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION$45,000
MENLO CHURCH$42,000
THE STANFORD FUND$35,000
VILLAGE ENTERPRISE$35,000
Individual grant recipient$32,000
THE FULLER FOUNDATION$25,000
MAYO CLINIC$23,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 40% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%THE STANFORD FUND: $35k → 7%KITP HOUSE PROJECT: $1.5M → 8%ELECTRON ELECTRIC DIPOLE MOMENT: $293k → 8%Regents of the University of California: $640k → 10%CALMATTERS: $500k → 12%UC SANTA BARBARA FOUNDATION: $680k → 14%FREEDOM ALLIANCE SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $30k → 4%SMALL BUSINESS ACTION COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $200k → 8%Californians to Defend the Open Primary: $150k → 8%LATINO LEADERSHIP AND POLICY FOUNDATION: $50k → 12%FREEDOM ALLIANCE SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $30k → 4%MENLO CHURCH: $42k → 7%MENLO PARK PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $40k → 7%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF WINCHESTER: $400k → 17%MENLO PARK PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $40k → 7%MENLO PARK PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $40k → 7%MENLO PARK PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $40k → 7%MENLO CHURCH: $35k → 7%MENLO CHURCH: $30k → 7%MENLO CHURCH: $30k → 7%MENLO CHURCH: $30k → 7%JOURNEY WITH JESUS FOUNDATION: $105k → 8%THE SALVATION ARMY: $60k → 14%JOURNEY WITH JESUS FOUNDATION: $60k → 8%THE SALVATION ARMY: $30k → 14%JOURNEY WITH JESUS FOUNDATION: $50k → 8%THE SALVATION ARMY: $30k → 14%JOURNEY WITH JESUS FOUNDATION: $50k → 8%FULLER THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY: $40k → 14%JOURNEY WITH JESUS FOUNDATION: $45k → 8%JOURNEY WITH JESUS FOUNDATION: $45k → 8%JOURNEY WITH JESUS FOUNDATION: $35k → 8%JOURNEY WITH JESUS FOUNDATION: $35k → 8%VILLAGE ENTERPRISE: $40k → 7%VILLAGE ENTERPRISE: $35k → 7%JOURNEY WITH JESUS FOUNDATION: $30k → 8%VILLAGE ENTERPRISE: $32k → 7%VILLAGE ENTERPRISE: $30k → 7%Adas Cafe: $60k → 8%HOPE HORIZON EPA: $60k → 8%BAYSHORE CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES: $55k → 8%THE SALVATION ARMY: $46k → 8%BAYSHORE CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES: $42k → 8%THE SALVATION ARMY: $40k → 8%THE SALVATION ARMY: $40k → 8%THE SALVATION ARMY: $40k → 8%THE SALVATION ARMY: $40k → 8%HOPE HORIZON EPA: $32k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
WI
NY
MA
IN
PA
CA
CO
VA
AZ
AR
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

58%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.7M · 52 repeat orgs$3.5M to everyone else

52 repeat relationships: 28 still active in FY2025, 24 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

52
20

Total granted

$4.7M
$622k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+65%
+71%

Still filing today

42%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 14% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.8M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationInternationalEnvironmentPhilanthropyReligionEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UC SANTA BARBARA FOUNDATION
    2× · 2023–2024 · $692k · revenue +167%
  • TJ
    THE JOURNEY WITH JESUS FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $455k · revenue +8% · 57% of their budget
  • IJ
    INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $429k · revenue +82%

Funded once

  • EE
    ELECTRON ELECTRIC DIPOLE MOMENT
    one grant, 2024 · $293k
  • SB
    SMALL BUSINESS ACTION COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $200k
  • LL
    LATINO LEADERSHIP & POLICY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2018 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
2
Ucla Foundation

The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…

Education
3
Golden Gate University

Golden gate university prepares individuals to lead and serve by providing high quality, practice-based educational programs in law, taxation, business and related professions - as a nonprofit institution - in an innovative and challenging…

Education
4
Dominican University of California

Our institutional mission is to educate and prepare students to be ethical leaders and socially responsible global citizens who incorporate the dominican values of study, reflection, community and service into their lives.

Education
5
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
6
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
7
Uc Riverside Foundation

To support educational, research and public functions and programs of the riverside campus of the university of california.

Education
8
California Forward

Ca fwd drives action to identify solutions that can be taken to scale to meet the challenges the state is facing. the organization is driven by the belief that regional solutions across the state will help ensure economic, environmental,…

Public Benefit
9
University of the Pacific

To provide a superior, student-centered learning experience integrating liberal arts and professional education and preparing individuals for lasting achievement and responsible leadership in their careers and communities.

Education
10
The David and Lucile Packard Foundation
Philanthropy
11
President-Board of Trustees Santa Clara College

Scu is a catholic and jesuit institution that makes student learning its central focus, promotes faculty and staff learning in its various forms, and exhibits organizational learning.

Education
12
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Uc Santa Barbara Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Kitp House Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

40 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 40 of the 84 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
36/40
Grantees still filing
26/40
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA: $640,000 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIATHE SALVATION ARMY: $325,700 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYELECTRON ELECTRIC DIPOLE MOMENT: $293,098 · OtherELECTRON ELECTRIC DIPOLE MOMENTSMALL BUSINESS ACTION COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $200,000 · OtherSMALL BUSINESS ACTION COMMUNITY FOUNDATIO…EASTSIDE COLLEGE PREPARATORY: $181,000 · OtherEASTSIDE COLLEGE PREPARATORYMENLO CHURCH: $167,000 · OtherMENLO CHURCHMENLO PARK PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $160,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $107,000 · OtherCalifornians to Defend the Open Primary: $150,000 · Other+49 more: $889,723 · Other+49 moreKITP HOUSE PROJECT: $1,525,000 · Housing & ShelterKITP HOUSE PROJECTUC SANTA BARBARA FOUNDATION: $692,000 · EducationUC SANTA BARBARA FO…THE AMERICAN FRIENDS OF WINCHESTER COLLEGE INC: $411,300 · EducationTHE AMERICAN FRIEND…FULLER THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY: $126,000 · EducationFULLER THEOLOGICAL …THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $121,010 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTE…University of Notre Dame du Lac: $50,500 · Education+7 more: $73,450 · EducationTHE JOURNEY WITH JESUS FOUNDATION: $455,000 · ReligionTHE JOURNEY …InterVarsity Christian FellowshipUSA: $285,800 · ReligionInterVarsity…HOPE HORIZON EAST PALO ALTO: $174,000 · ReligionHOPE HORIZON…INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION: $429,000 · InternationalINTERNATIO…VILLAGE ENTERPRISE FUND: $262,000 · InternationalVILLAGE EN…FREEDOM ALLIANCE: $75,000 · InternationalFREEDOM AL…+1 more: $15,300 · InternationalCalMatters: $500,000 · Civil RightsTHE FULLER FOUNDATION: $103,026 · PhilanthropyTHE PALO ALTO COMMUNITY FUND: $58,000 · PhilanthropyThe New Horizons Foundation Inc: $20,000 · PhilanthropyEAST PALO ALTO KIDS FOUNDATION: $11,900 · Philanthropy+1 more: $2,200 · Philanthropy
Other$3,113,521Housing & Shelter$1,525,000Education$1,474,260Religion$914,800International$781,300Civil Rights$500,000Philanthropy$195,126

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetKITP HOUSE PROJECT: $1,525,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetUC SANTA BARBARA FOUNDATION: $692,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetCalMatters: $500,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetTHE JOURNEY WITH JESUS FOUNDATION: $455,000 over 9y, 57% of budgetINTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION: $429,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetTHE AMERICAN FRIENDS OF WINCHESTER COLLEGE INC: $411,300 over 7y, 3.8% of budgetInterVarsity Christian FellowshipUSA: $285,800 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetVILLAGE ENTERPRISE FUND: $262,000 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetHOPE HORIZON EAST PALO ALTO: $174,000 over 5y, 5.5% of budgetFULLER THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY: $126,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $121,010 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FULLER FOUNDATION: $103,026 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetFREEDOM ALLIANCE: $75,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetAda's Cafe: $63,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE PALO ALTO COMMUNITY FUND: $58,000 over 6y, 2.3% of budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $50,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe New Horizons Foundation Inc: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetDowntown Streets Inc: $19,600 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCALIFORNIA FAMILY FOUNDATION: $15,800 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetHEIFER INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION: $15,300 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR A COLLEGE EDUCATION: $13,100 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetEAST PALO ALTO KIDS FOUNDATION: $11,900 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetHARVARD-WESTLAKE SCHOOL: $11,850 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCanopy: $11,050 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetGANNA WALSKA LOTUSLAND: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LIBRARY FOUNDATION OF LOS ANGELES: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $9,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetKQED INC: $4,350 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC: $3,700 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $3,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetOLD NORTH ILLUMINATED INC: $2,200 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $1,300 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSEMPERVIRENS FUND: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPENINSULA OPEN SPACE TRUST: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREEN ENVELOPE FUND: $150 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds KITP HOUSE PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds UC SANTA BARBARA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CalMatters ↗
  • Who funds THE JOURNEY WITH JESUS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN FRIENDS OF WINCHESTER COLLEGE INC ↗
  • Who funds InterVarsity Christian FellowshipUSA ↗
  • Who funds VILLAGE ENTERPRISE FUND ↗
  • Who funds HOPE HORIZON EAST PALO ALTO ↗
  • Who funds Californians to Defend the Open Primary ↗
  • Who funds FULLER THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THE FULLER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FREEDOM ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds Ada's Cafe ↗
  • Who funds THE PALO ALTO COMMUNITY FUND ↗
  • Who funds University of Notre Dame du Lac ↗
  • Who funds LATINO LEADERSHIP & POLICY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds The New Horizons Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds Downtown Streets Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Silicon Valley Community FoundationCA20× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · The Palo Alto Community Fund · Los Altos Mountain View Community Foundation · Philanthropic Ventures Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Marin Community Foundation · Jacob L and Lillian Holtzmann Foundation · Embarcadero Media Foundation · The George and Judy Marcus Family Foundation · Atkinson Foundation · The David and Lucile Packard Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Cnc Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Cnc Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 94%
  • Old North Illuminated Inc: 94% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Cnc Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Cnc Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 84 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Cnc’s filings →

More from the funding graph