Skip to content
Clyde R Evans Charitable Trust at a glance

· Private foundation

Clyde R Evans Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$504k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$94k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$2.1MHuman Services$1.2MPhilanthropy$582kEducation$224kInternational$158kYouth Development$75kHousing & Shelter$40kRecreation & Sports$35kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $7k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $95k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $402k
$20,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$6.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OKLAHOMA MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATIO$94,250
MASONIC CHARITY FOUNDATION OF OK$69,250
SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN$69,250
SALVATION ARMY OF OKLAHOMA$69,250
HEARTS FOR HEARING HEARTS$50,000
MERCY HEALTH FOUNDATION$50,000
OUTRAGEOUS LOVE INC$20,000
JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF OKLAHOMA INC$20,000
NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES ORGANIZATION$15,000
HOPE IS ALIVE$15,000
OSU FOUNDATION$15,000
OK LIONS BOYS RANCH DBA LIONS MEADO$10,000
CITY RESCUE MISSION$5,000
LAST FRONTIER COUNCIL BSA$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $435k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%OKLAHOMA LIONS BOYS RANCH: $10k → 19%OKLAHOMA LIONS BOYS RANCH: $10k → 19%OK LIONS BOYS RANCH DBA LIONS MEADO: $10k → 19%OK LIONS BOYS RANCH DBA LIONS MEADO: $10k → 19%OK LIONS BOYS RANCH DBA LIONS MEADO: $10k → 19%OKLAHOMA LIONS BOYS RANCH: $5k → 19%CITY RESCUE MISSION: $5k → 16%CITY RESCUE MISSION: $5k → 16%CITY RESCUE MISSION: $5k → 16%CITY RESCUE MISSION: $5k → 16%CITY RESCUE MISSION: $5k → 16%CITY RESCUE MISSION: $5k → 16%CITY RESCUE MISSION: $5k → 16%CITY RESCUE MISSION: $5k → 16%HEARTS FOR HEARING: $15k → 16%HEARTS FOR HEARING: $15k → 16%HEARTS FOR HEARING: $10k → 16%HEARTS FOR HEARING: $10k → 16%NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES ORGANIZATION: $15k → 16%NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES ORGANIZATION: $15k → 16%NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES ORGANIZATION: $15k → 16%INFANT CRISIS SERVICES: $10k → 16%NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES ORGANIZATION: $15k → 16%INFANT CRISIS SERVICES: $10k → 16%NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES ORGANIZATION: $15k → 16%INFANT CRISIS SERVICES: $10k → 16%NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES ORGANIZATION: $15k → 16%INFANT CRISIS SERVICES: $10k → 16%NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES ORGANIZATION: $15k → 16%INFANT CRISIS SERVICES: $10k → 16%NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES ORGANIZATION: $15k → 16%SPECIAL CARE INC: $10k → 16%INFANT CRISIS SERVICES: $10k → 16%NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES ORGANIZATION: $15k → 16%PEPPERS RANCH INC: $25k → 16%PEPPERS RANCH INC: $20k → 16%PEPPERS RANCH INC: $20k → 16%PEPPERS RANCH INC: $20k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.5M · 34 repeat orgs$133k to everyone else

34 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 20 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

34
11

Total granted

$4.5M
$133k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+72%
+224%

Still filing today

50%
18%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationInternationalFood & NutritionRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation
    9× · 2017–2025 · $807k · revenue +74%
  • SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN
    5× · 2021–2025 · $336k · revenue +12%
  • JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF OKLAHOMA INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $158k · revenue +161%

Funded once

  • OK
    OCU KRAMER NURSING SCHOOL
    one grant, 2017 · $38k
  • MH
    MERCY HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2018 · $25k
  • YW
    YWCA WOMEN'S SHELTER
    one grant, 2017 · $13k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Life International

To partner with leaders globally to boldly proclaim the biblical truth of the father's heart for life, champion the gospel of jesus christ, and establish life-giving ministries.

Health
2
Leadership Oklahoma Inc

Leadership oklahoma was organized to create, inspire, and support a dynamic network of leaders whose increased awareness and commitement to service will energize oklahomans to shape oklahoma's future.

Public Benefit
3
Ronald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa

Ronald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa provides essential services that remove barriers, strengthen families, and promote healing when children need healthcare.

—
4
Oklahoma City Housing Services Redevelopment Corporation

To revitalize urban oklahoma city neighborhoods and create affordable housing opportunities by rehabilitating historic homes, constructing new homes, and increasing community investment through home ownership.

Housing & Shelter
5
Oklahoma Hall of Fame

The oklahoma hall of fame preserves oklahomas unique history while promoting pride in our great state through each of its programs and the gaylord-pickens museum. the association honors our states rich tradition by telling oklahomas story…

Arts & Culture
6
Family Health Center of Southern Oklahoma Inc

To increase access to comprehensive primary and preventative health care and to improve the health care status of the under served and vulnerable populations within the center's geographic area.

Health
7
Care Center-Child Abuse Response and Evaluation Inc Dba the Care Center

The CARE Center exists to reduce trauma for child abuse victims and their families, coordinate a multidisciplinary approach to child abuse investigations, and provide free, effective child abuse prevention resources and education.

Human Services
8
Operation Care International Inc

Operation care international exists to glorify god. in obedience to his will, we connect impoverished children and the homeless to jesus christ providing for their physical needs through god's provision both at home and abroad.

Human Services
9
East Central Oklahoma Family Health Center Inc

To provide preventative primary affordable clinical health care, dental and prescription drug coverage to the consumers to include the uninsured and under insured.

Health
10
University Hospital & Clinics Inc

The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
11
Indian Health Care Resource Center Inc

To empower the american indian through exceptional healthcare.

Health
12
Caring Hands Healthcare Centersinc

To increase access to comprehensive primary health care and to improve the health care status of the under served and vulnerable populations within the center's geographic area.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Oklahoma State University Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Outrageous Love Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
16/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SALVATION ARMY OF OKLAHOMA: $582,250 · OtherSALVATION ARMY OF OKLAHOMAMASONIC CHARITY FOUNDATION OF OK: $582,250 · OtherMASONIC CHARITY FOUNDATION OF OKMERCY HEALTH FOUNDATION: $350,000 · OtherMERCY HEALTH FOUNDATIONSHRINERS HOSPITAL CRIPPLED CHILDREN: $246,250 · OtherSHRINERS HOSPITAL CRIPPLED CHILDRENKINGS KLINIC INC: $155,000 · OtherKINGS KLINIC INCHEARTS FOR HEARING HEARTS: $122,500 · Other+21 more: $448,334 · Other+21 moreOklahoma Medical Research Foundation: $807,250 · HealthOklahoma Medical Research Foun…SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $336,000 · HealthSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDRE…+3 more: $77,500 · Health+3 moreNEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES ORGANIZATION INC: $135,000 · Human ServicesNEIGHBORHOOD …Outrageous Love Inc: $120,000 · Human ServicesOutrageous Lo…PEPPERS RANCH INC: $85,000 · Human ServicesPEPPERS RANCH…INFANT CRISIS SERVICES INC: $60,000 · Human ServicesINFANT CRISIS…OKLAHOMA LIONS BOYS RANCH INC dba LIONS MEADOWS OF HOPE: $55,000 · Human ServicesOKLAHOMA LION…Hearts for Hearing Foundation: $50,000 · Human ServicesHearts for He…CITY RESCUE MISSION INC: $40,000 · Human ServicesCITY RESCUE M…+1 more: $10,000 · Human ServicesJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF OKLAHOMA INC: $157,500 · InternationalOKLAHOMA CITY UNIVERSITY: $92,500 · EducationOklahoma State University Foundation: $55,000 · EducationFIELDS & FUTURES FOUNDATION: $35,000 · Recreation & SportsREGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA INC: $7,500 · Food & Nutrition
Other$2,486,584Health$1,220,750Human Services$555,000International$157,500Education$147,500Recreation & Sports$35,000Food & Nutrition$7,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOklahoma Medical Research Foundation: $807,250 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $336,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF OKLAHOMA INC: $157,500 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES ORGANIZATION INC: $135,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetOutrageous Love Inc: $120,000 over 6y, 8.2% of budgetOKLAHOMA CITY UNIVERSITY: $92,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPEPPERS RANCH INC: $85,000 over 4y, 2.4% of budgetINFANT CRISIS SERVICES INC: $60,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetOKLAHOMA LIONS BOYS RANCH INC dba LIONS MEADOWS OF HOPE: $55,000 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetOklahoma State University Foundation: $55,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHearts for Hearing Foundation: $50,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCITY RESCUE MISSION INC: $40,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetFIELDS & FUTURES FOUNDATION: $35,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetHOPE IS ALIVE MINISTRIES INC: $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCROSSINGS COMMUNITY CLINIC INC: $27,500 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetOKLAHOMA LIONS SERVICE FOUNDATION INC: $22,500 over 2y, 6.5% of budgetSPECIAL CARE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetREGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation ↗
  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF OKLAHOMA INC ↗
  • Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES ORGANIZATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Outrageous Love Inc ↗
  • Who funds OKLAHOMA CITY UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds PEPPERS RANCH INC ↗
  • Who funds INFANT CRISIS SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds OKLAHOMA LIONS BOYS RANCH INC dba LIONS MEADOWS OF HOPE ↗
  • Who funds Oklahoma State University Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Hearts for Hearing Foundation ↗
  • Who funds CITY RESCUE MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds FIELDS & FUTURES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HOPE IS ALIVE MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds CROSSINGS COMMUNITY CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds OKLAHOMA LIONS SERVICE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PARKINSON FOUNDATION OF OKLAHOMA ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL CARE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Oklahoma City Communi…Sarkeys FoundationAmerican Fidelity Fou…El and Thelma Gaylord…Inasmuch FoundationCommunities Foundatio…Fred Jones Family Fou…David & Lezlie Hudibu…Presbyterian Health F…Wegener Foundation IncLove Meyer Family Fou…The Merrick Foundation
Oklahoma City Community Foundation IncOK27.7× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc · Sarkeys Foundation · American Fidelity Foundation · El and Thelma Gaylord Foundation · Inasmuch Foundation · Communities Foundation of Oklahoma · Fred Jones Family Foundation · David & Lezlie Hudiburg Family Fdn · Presbyterian Health Foundation · Wegener Foundation Inc · Love Meyer Family Foundation · The Merrick Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Clyde R Evans Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Clyde R Evans Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 80%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation: 31% of income from government
  • Special Care Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Clyde R Evans Charitable Trust?

Find your warmest path to Clyde R Evans Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 45 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Clyde R Evans’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home