How much did CLYDE R EVANS CHARITABLE TRUST grant in FY2025?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 75% of CLYDE R EVANS CHARITABLE TRUST’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

boys ranchclinic

2020

boys ranchclinic

2021

boys ranch

2022

hearts

2023

heartslions

2024

heartslions

2025

heartslions

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

Under $10k2 grants · $7k
$10k–50k6 grants · $95k
$50k–250k6 grants · $402k

$20,000

Median grant

States reached

$11M

Total assets

Largest grants

OKLAHOMA MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATIO$94,250
MASONIC CHARITY FOUNDATION OF OK$69,250
SALVATION ARMY OF OKLAHOMA$69,250
SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN$69,250
HEARTS FOR HEARING HEARTS$50,000
MERCY HEALTH FOUNDATION$50,000
JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF OKLAHOMA INC$20,000
OUTRAGEOUS LOVE INC$20,000
HOPE IS ALIVE$15,000
NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES ORGANIZATION$15,000
OSU FOUNDATION$15,000
OK LIONS BOYS RANCH DBA LIONS MEADO$10,000
CITY RESCUE MISSION$5,000
LAST FRONTIER COUNCIL BSA$2,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $305k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16% — the area typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$4.1M · 33 repeat orgs$82k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +83% since the first grant, against +53% for the ones you funded once.

33 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$4.1M

$82k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+83%

+53%

Still filing today

30%

38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesHealthInternationalEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN
5× · 2021–2025 · $336k · revenue +120%
JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF OKLAHOMA INC
8× · 2018–2025 · $145k · revenue +161%
NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES ORGANIZATION
8× · 2018–2025 · $120k · revenue +21%

Funded once

MH
MERCY HOSPITAL
one grant, 2018 · $25k
OL
OKLAHOMA LIONS SERVICE FOUNDATION
one grant, 2018 · $13k · revenue -47%
NC
NATIONAL COWBOY & WESTERN
one grant, 2022 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Mercy Hospital Oklahoma City

As the sisters of mercy before us, we bring to life the healing ministry of jesus through our compassionate care and exceptional service.

Health

Oklahoma City Housing Services

To revitalize urban oklahoma city neighborhoods and create affordable housing opportunities by rehabilitating historic homes, constructing new homes, and increasing community investment through home ownership.

Housing & Shelter

Operation Care International Inc

To help the homeless in the city of dallas, texas and beyond.

Human Services

Oklahoma City Family Justice Center Inc

The mission of the okcfjc is to provide protection, hope and healing to those impacted by domestic and family violence in the oklahoma city community. the organization provides a centrally located facility which co-locates and coordinates…

Crime & Legal

Oklahoma Child Care Resource & Referral

Oklahoma Child Care Resource & Referral does whatever it takes to make child care work for families, children, and providers. We give families peace of mind by equipping them with information on child care options, providing free referrals…

—

Oklahoma Halfway House Inc

Assist individuals experiencing homelessness with urgent critical needs, like housing.

Health

The City Lights Foundation of Oklahoma

We serve tulsa's homeless and low-income community through multiple programs that provide basic needs, build relationships and provide hope and restoration.

Human Services

Ronald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa

Ronald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa provides essential services that remove barriers, strengthen families, and promote healing when children need healthcare.

—

Junior League of Oklahoma City

The junior league of oklahoma city, oklahoma, incorporated, is an organization of women whose mission is to advance women's leadership for meaningful community impact through volunteer action, collaboration, and training.

Community Improvement

Reliant Living Centers of Oklahoma Inc

The mission is to provide those with developmental disabilities, a home-like residential setting that encourages independent living and skill development, thus enabling these individuals to achieve their greatest potential within the…

Health

Panhandle Services for Children

Provides mental health services, host home and foster home recruitment, case management, and placement services and prevention and educaiton programs to youth and families in the oklahoma panhandle.

Housing & Shelter

Oklahoma Disability Law Center Inc

To provide legal advocacy to persons with developmental, mental and other disabilities

Crime & Legal

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is City Rescue Mission Inc and the most unlike its peers is Peppers Ranch Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

13 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

13/13

Grantees still filing

11/13

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$3,103,834Human Services$425,000Health$373,500International$145,000Education$92,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Oklahoma City Community Foundation IncOK24.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc · American Fidelity Foundation · Sarkeys Foundation · El and Thelma Gaylord Foundation · Wegener Foundation Inc · Love Meyer Family Foundation · Inasmuch Foundation · The Anne and Henry Zarrow Foundation · Communities Foundation of Oklahoma · Je and le Mabee Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation CLYDE R EVANS CHARITABLE TRUST funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

4get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: OUTRAGEOUS LOVE INC.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

high risk

~3 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 8 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 5.4× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 812786688 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on OUTRAGEOUS LOVE INC, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 3 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 8% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Clyde R Evans Charitable Trust?

Find your warmest path to Clyde R Evans Charitable Trust through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

CLYDE R EVANS CHARITABLE TRUST

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

13 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Clyde R Evans Charitable Trust?

More from the funding graph

CLYDE R EVANS CHARITABLE TRUST

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

13 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Clyde R Evans Charitable Trust?

More from the funding graph