Skip to content
Clive and Suzanne Fazioli Foundation Charitable Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Clive and Suzanne Fazioli Foundation Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$8k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$75kHealth$72kHuman Services$30kAnimals$23kEducation$20kReligion$14kPhilanthropy$10kRecreation & Sports$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PALM SPRINGS ANIMAL SHELTER$5,000
CREATIVE HAVERHILL$1,188
ST JOSEPH'S INDIAN SCHOOL$1,000
SALVATION ARMY$500
ALLEY CAT ALLIES$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $71k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 4% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS: $500 → 16%FOUNDATION DARIO: $12k → 8%HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS: $500 → 16%FOUNDATION DARIO: $5k → 8%FOUNDATION DARIO: $1k → 8%FOUNDATION DARIO: $1k → 8%WELL IN THE DESERT: $1k → 11%FOUNDATION DARIO: $500 → 8%WELL IN THE DESERT: $500 → 11%MERRIMACK VALLEY HOSPICE: $16k → 10%MERRIMACK VALLEY HOSPICE: $16k → 10%MERRIMACK VALLEY HOSPICE: $16k → 10%MARY IMMACULATE GUILD: $150 → 10%COMMUNITY GIVING TREE: $1k → 10%MARY IMMACULATE GUILD: $50 → 10%COMMUNITY GIVING TREE: $500 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
MT
IL
NY
MA
SD
CT
CA
MD
NM
TN
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$229k · 26 repeat orgs$27k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +32% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

26 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 23 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
17

Total granted

$229k
$22k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
0%

Still filing today

69%
18%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 33% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthAnimalsHousing & ShelterArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TM
    TUFTS MEDICINE CARE AT HOME INC
    3× · 2020–2022 · $48k · revenue +72%
  • CREATIVE HAVERHILL INC
    3× · 2022–2025 · $38k · revenue +90%
  • OP
    OGUNQUIT PLAYHOUSE FOUNDATION
    5× · 2020–2024 · $37k · revenue +303%

Funded once

  • SB
    ST BONAVENTURE MISSION
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
  • BS
    BRIDGEWATER STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF TUFTS CSDD
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
2
Boston Health Care for the Homeless Program Inc

The mission of the boston health care for the homeless program (bhchp) is to provide or assure access to the highest quality health care for all individuals and families experiencing homelessness in our community.

Human Services
3
New England Quality Care Alliance Inc

New england quality care alliance, inc. operates for the purpose of supporting activities of tufts medical center parent, inc. and its affiliates. new england quality care alliance, inc. was formed to improve the health of patients and to…

Health
4
Harvard Street Neighborhood Health Center Inc

Harvard street neighborhood health center serves as the primary health resource to our community, through the delivery of comprehensive patient-centered medical care.

Health
5
Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return

Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.

Health
6
Mass General Brigham Health Plan Inc

Mass general brigham health plan's mission is to promote the health and wellness of our members, and to help ensure equitable, affordbale health care for the diverse communities we serve.

Health
7
The Mercy Hospital Inc

We, trinity health of new england and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. the mercy hospital is a member of trinity health of new england…

Health
8
Massachusetts Health Quality Partners Inc

MHQP's mission is to improve the quality and equity of patient care experiences in Massachusetts through data-driven insights and collaboration. As an independent voice for healthcare quality and an advocate for the importance of listening…

Education
9
Dartmouth Health Home Care Inc

We are dedicated to delivering outstanding home health and hospice services that enrich the lives of the people we serve.

—
10
Neighborhealth Corporation

Neighborhealth's mission is to promote and sustain healthy communities, families, and individuals by providing accessible, person-centered, and compassionate, high-quality health care services to all who live and work in our service area,…

Health
11
Mercy Life Inc

We, trinity health pace and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. mercy life is a member of trinity health pace and trinity health.

—
12
Health Assessment Lab Inc

1) development & validation of new measures 2) translation & adaption of tools for use in international research 3) technical assistance in support of patient -based tools in a variety of specific applications 4) education & training in…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Home for Little Wanderers Inc; the most unlike its peers is Creative Haverhill Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/23
Grantees still filing
14/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CREATIVE HAVERHILL INC: $37,998 · OtherCREATIVE HAVERHILL INCPALM SPRINGS ANIMAL HOSPITAL: $12,750 · OtherPALM SPRINGS ANIMAL HOSPITALIMMACULATE CONCEPTION CHURCH: $10,000 · OtherIMMACULATE CONCEPTION CHURCHST JOSEPHS INDIAN SCHOOL: $6,500 · OtherST JOSEPHS INDIAN SCHOOLST LABRE INDIAN SCHOOL: $6,100 · OtherPALM SPRINGS ANIMAL SHELTER: $5,000 · OtherST BONAVENTURE MISSION: $5,000 · OtherBRIDGEWATER STATE UNIVERSITY: $5,000 · OtherTOM SAGER GOLF ACADEMY: $5,000 · OtherCare Dimensions Inc: $4,500 · OtherST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY: $4,250 · Other+17 more: $16,990 · Other+17 moreTUFTS MEDICINE CARE AT HOME INC: $47,500 · Human ServicesTUFTS MEDICINE CARE AT HOME INCFOUNDATION DARIO INC: $19,050 · Human ServicesFOUNDATION DARIO INC+4 more: $4,200 · Human Services+4 moreOGUNQUIT PLAYHOUSE FOUNDATION: $36,680 · Arts & CultureOGUNQUIT PLAYHOU…THE MULTIPLE MYELOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $5,500 · HealthTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $5,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $4,000 · HealthGREATER LAWRENCE FAMILY HEALTH CENTER INC: $2,600 · Health+1 more: $500 · HealthPAW WARRIORS INC: $4,500 · AnimalsAlley Cat Allies Inc: $500 · AnimalsLAZARUS HOUSE INC: $3,000 · Housing & ShelterBOSTON RESCUE MISSION INC: $646 · Housing & ShelterFOSTER KIDS OF MERRIMACK VALLEY: $3,500 · Youth Development
Other$119,088Human Services$70,750Arts & Culture$36,680Health$17,600Animals$5,000Housing & Shelter$3,646Youth Development$3,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTUFTS MEDICINE CARE AT HOME INC: $47,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCREATIVE HAVERHILL INC: $37,998 over 3y, 15% of budgetOGUNQUIT PLAYHOUSE FOUNDATION: $36,680 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetFOUNDATION DARIO INC: $19,050 over 5y, 7.8% of budgetTHE MULTIPLE MYELOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $5,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPAW WARRIORS INC: $4,500 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetCare Dimensions Inc: $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFOSTER KIDS OF MERRIMACK VALLEY: $3,500 over 4y, 27% of budgetLAZARUS HOUSE INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER LAWRENCE FAMILY HEALTH CENTER INC: $2,600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY GIVING TREE INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE WELL IN THE DESERT INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBOSTON RESCUE MISSION INC: $646 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTUFTS MEDICINE CARE AT HOME PARENT INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAlley Cat Allies Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHALLENGE UNLIMITED INC: $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHEAST ANIMAL SHELTER INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMary Immaculate Guild Inc: $200 over 2y, 1.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TUFTS MEDICINE CARE AT HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds CREATIVE HAVERHILL INC ↗
  • Who funds OGUNQUIT PLAYHOUSE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION DARIO INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MULTIPLE MYELOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds PAW WARRIORS INC ↗
  • Who funds Care Dimensions Inc ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds FOSTER KIDS OF MERRIMACK VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds LAZARUS HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER LAWRENCE FAMILY HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY GIVING TREE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE WELL IN THE DESERT INC ↗
  • Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS INC ↗
  • Who funds BOSTON RESCUE MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds ANDOVER GARDEN CLUB ↗
  • Who funds TUFTS MEDICINE CARE AT HOME PARENT INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Demoulas FoundationArbella Insurance Fou…The Pfizer Foundation…The Bank of America C…American Endowment Fo…Network for GoodMorgan Stanley Global…Paypal Charitable Giv…Vanguard Charitable E…Donor Advised Charita…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …
Demoulas FoundationMA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Demoulas Foundation · Arbella Insurance Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Network for Good · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Clive and Suzanne Fazioli Foundation Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Clive and Suzanne Fazioli Foundation Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 13%
  • Greater Lawrence Family Health Center Inc: 40% of income from government
  • The Home for Little Wanderers Inc: 38% of income from government
  • Care Dimensions Inc: 14% of income from government
  • Creative Haverhill Inc: 13% of income from government
  • The Shriners' Hospital for Children: 6% of income from government
  • Tufts Medicine Care at Home Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Lazarus House Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 45 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Clive and Suzanne Fazioli’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home