Skip to content

· Private foundation

Click Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$249k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$219k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$1.7MInternational$341kEducation$88kPhilanthropy$2k
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $219k
$15,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$64k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PURSUIT 53$219,000
KATHY WAMPLER MINISTRIES$15,000
AMAZIMA MINISTRIES$9,000
LOVE A CHILD$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 87% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%EMBRACE FELLOWSHIP CHURCH: $15k → 9%EVERY VILLAGE: $6k → 16%LOVE A CHILD: $143k → 11%SET FREE: $3k → 10%ASSEMBLIES GOD WORLD MISSIONS: $47k → 15%DAVID GEORGE WORLD MINISTRIES: $12k → 8%UPLIFT MOUNTAIN: $43k → 11%HEARTLINE: $10k → 11%EMBRACE FELLOWSHIP CHURCH: $10k → 9%EVERY VILLAGE: $6k → 16%LOVE A CHILD: $34k → 11%SET FREE: $3k → 10%ASSEMBLIES GOD WORLD MISSIONS: $16k → 15%DAVID GEORGE WORLD MINISTRIES: $8k → 8%UPLIFT MOUNTAIN: $7k → 11%HEARTLINE: $9k → 11%GRACE BAPTIST CHURCH: $68k → 9%LOVE A CHILD: $25k → 11%SET FREE: $3k → 10%UPLIFT MOUNTAIN: $3k → 11%HEARTLINE: $9k → 11%GRAND PARKWAY CHURCH: $65k → 9%ASSEMBLY OF GOD CHURCH: $50k → 16%LOVE A CHILD: $22k → 11%SET FREE: $3k → 10%HEARTLINE: $8k → 11%DAYSPRING CHURCH: $15k → 9%FIRST ASSEMBLY OF GOD CHURCH: $29k → 16%LOVE A CHILD: $13k → 11%DAYSPRING CHURCH: $12k → 9%ASSEMBLY OF GOD CHURCH: $23k → 16%LOVE A CHILD: $12k → 11%MISSION2MADA: $8k → 9%ASSEMBLY OF GOD: $14k → 16%LOVE A CHILD: $9k → 11%GRACE COVENANT BAPTIST CHURCH: $5k → 9%ASSEMBLY OF GOD: $8k → 16%LOVE A CHILD: $7k → 11%LOVE A CHILD: $6k → 11%PURSUIT 53: $274k → 16%LOVE A CHILD: $6k → 11%PURSUIT 53: $219k → 16%LOVE A CHILD: $6k → 11%PURSUIT 53: $214k → 16%PURSUIT 53: $125k → 16%PURSUIT 53: $109k → 16%PURSUIT 53: $94k → 16%PURSUIT 53: $32k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MI
NY
CO
MO
VA
TN
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 55% of Click Family Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 73% of the giving stays in TX; by stated purpose, 21%.

Click Family Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 72% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.0M · 18 repeat orgs$151k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
6

Total granted

$2.0M
$151k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+10%
+46%

Still filing today

39%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionInternationalEducationPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • P5
    Pursuit 53
    8× · 2018–2025 · $1.1M · revenue +24% · 51% of their budget
  • AM
    Amazima Ministries International Education and Empowerment for East
    9× · 2017–2025 · $80k · revenue +10%
  • DG
    DAVID GEORGE WORLD MINISTRIES INC
    2× · 2017–2021 · $20k · revenue +4%

Funded once

  • GB
    GRACE BAPTIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2019 · $68k
  • GP
    GRAND PARKWAY CHURCH
    one grant, 2017 · $65k
  • M
    MISSION2MADA
    one grant, 2018 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
A2 Ministries International Ltd
Religion
2
Discover Your Mission Inc

Supporing missionaries worldwide

Religion
3
Global Gospel Initiative Inc
Religion
4
Evangelism Partners International
Religion
5
Jesus in Vietnam Ministries
Religion
6
Reconciliation Ministries International Inc

Reconciliaton Ministries Intl. is a Christian evangelical organization preaching and teaching the Word of God in over 60 countries. The ministry equips and encourages Christians everywhere to be saved, healed, and delivered according to…

Religion
7
Power Ministries International Inc
—
8
Dove On the Rise International

Expansion of the Gospel of Christ through training literature and digital teaching materials.

—
9
Whole World Ministries

Train&equip leaders for churchs

Religion
10
New Heart World Ministries
Religion
11
Paul Wilbur Ministries Inc

Further the gospel through music and preaching

Religion
12
Todd Worldwide Ministries
Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Every Village; the most unlike its peers is New Beginning Resources Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Pursuit 53: $1,068,550 · ReligionPursuit 53+2 more: $33,500 · ReligionTHE ASSEMBLY OF GOD CHURCH: $72,750 · OtherTHE ASSEMBLY OF GOD CHURCHGRACE BAPTIST CHURCH: $68,000 · OtherGRACE BAPTIST CHURCHGRAND PARKWAY CHURCH: $65,000 · OtherGRAND PARKWAY CHURCHASSEMBLIES GOD WORLD MISSIONS: $63,024 · OtherASSEMBLIES GOD WORLD MISSIONSIndividual grant recipient: $52,697 · OtherIndividual grant recipientKATHY WAMPLER MINISTRIES: $40,000 · OtherKATHY WAMPLER MINISTRIESHEARTLINE: $35,750 · OtherHEARTLINEFIRST ASSEMBLY OF GOD CHURCH: $29,759 · OtherFIRST ASSEMBLY OF GOD CHURCHDAYSPRING CHURCH: $27,000 · OtherEMBRACE FELLOWSHIP CHURCH: $25,000 · OtherASSEMBLY OF GOD: $21,850 · OtherSET FREE: $19,450 · Other+4 more: $29,342 · Other+4 moreLOVE A CHILD INC: $284,350 · InternationalLOVE A CHILD INCAmazima Ministries International Education and Empowerment for East: $80,250 · InternationalAmazima Ministries I…+1 more: $12,500 · InternationalROEVER FOUNDATION INC: $87,924 · EducationNEW BEGINNING RESOURCES INC: $2,475 · Philanthropy
Religion$1,102,050Other$549,622International$377,100Education$87,924Philanthropy$2,475

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPursuit 53: $1,068,550 over 8y, 51% of budgetLOVE A CHILD INC: $284,350 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetROEVER FOUNDATION INC: $87,924 over 5y, 12% of budgetAmazima Ministries International Education and Empowerment for East: $80,250 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetDAVID GEORGE WORLD MINISTRIES INC: $20,000 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetTHE JOSHUA FUND: $13,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetEVERY VILLAGE: $12,500 over 3y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Pursuit 53 ↗
  • Who funds LOVE A CHILD INC ↗
  • Who funds ROEVER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Amazima Ministries International Education and Empowerment for East ↗
  • Who funds DAVID GEORGE WORLD MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE JOSHUA FUND ↗
  • Who funds EVERY VILLAGE ↗
  • Who funds NEW BEGINNING RESOURCES INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Servant FoundationKS12× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Servant Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Click Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Click Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Love a Child Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Click Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Click Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Click Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph