Skip to content

· Private foundation

Clark R Green Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$714k
Granted FY2025still arriving
36
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Environment$1.1MHealth$646kArts & Culture$524kHuman Services$399kReligion$366kEducation$312kFood & Nutrition$210kHousing & Shelter$150kOther$0
02FY2025 · 36 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $39k
  • $10k–50k22 grants · $475k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $200k
$20,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$15M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL$50,000
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S HOSP$50,000
BROOKLYN BOTANIC GARDEN$50,000
CITY HARVEST$50,000
MANHATTAN SCHOOL OF MUSIC$35,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$30,000
GODS LOVE WE DELIVER$30,000
THE BROOKLYN MUSEUM$30,000
THE FUND FOR THE CITY OF NY$25,000
LGBT COMMUNITY CENTER$25,000
ASPCA$25,000
SISTERS OF MERCY$25,000
THE NATURE CONSERVANCY$25,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$25,000
THE SALVATION ARMY$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 94% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $25k → 22%NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL: $110k → 17%SISTERS OF MERCY: $25k → 20%ST JUDE CHILDRENS HOSPITAL: $50k → 17%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $25k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $25k → 22%NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL: $110k → 17%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S HOSP: $50k → 17%CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY LONG BEACH: $30k → 14%NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL: $100k → 17%ST JUDE CHILDRENS HOSPITAL: $50k → 17%NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL: $50k → 17%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S HOSP: $50k → 17%GOODWILL SOLAC: $30k → 14%NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL: $50k → 17%NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL: $50k → 17%BROOKLYN PUBLIC LIBRARY: $50k → 20%BROOKLYN PUBLIC LIBRARY: $50k → 20%CITY HARVEST: $50k → 20%BROOKLYN MUSEUM OF ART: $50k → 20%BROOKLYN MUSEUM OF ART: $40k → 20%THE BROOKLYN MUSEUM: $30k → 20%BROOKLYN MUSEUM OF ART: $30k → 20%BROOKLYN MUSEUM OF ART: $30k → 20%THE BROOKLYN MUSEUM: $30k → 20%SALVATION ARMY: $50k → 20%JUVENILE DIABETES FOUNDATION: $30k → 17%SALVATION ARMY: $50k → 20%JUVENILE DIABETES FOUNDATION: $30k → 17%SALVATION ARMY: $45k → 20%PAC FUND FOR CITY OF NEW YORK: $100k → 17%ST ANN AND THE HOLY TRINITY: $60k → 20%GRACE CHURCH: $40k → 20%GRACE CHURCH: $37k → 20%GRACE CHURCH: $36k → 20%ST ANN AND THE HOLY TRINITY: $30k → 20%ST ANN AND THE HOLY TRINITY: $30k → 20%MANHATTAN SCHOOL OF MUSIC: $35k → 17%BROOKLYN BOTANIC GARDEN: $110k → 20%BROOKLYN BOTANIC GARDEN: $110k → 20%BROOKLYN BOTANIC GARDEN: $100k → 20%BROOKLYN BOTANIC GARDEN: $100k → 20%BROOKLYN BOTANIC GARDEN: $85k → 20%BROOKLYN BOTANIC GARDEN: $50k → 20%GODS LOVE WE DELIVER: $30k → 17%GODS LOVE WE DELIVER: $30k → 17%GODS LOVE WE DELIVER: $30k → 17%GODS LOVE WE DELIVER: $30k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
OH
PA
CA
MD
TN
DC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.9M · 43 repeat orgs$256k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +24% since the first grant, against +10% for those funded once.

43 repeat relationships: 29 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

43
14

Total granted

$3.9M
$213k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+10%

Still filing today

51%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $43k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHealthEnvironmentAnimalsEducationFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BB
    BROOKLYN BOTANIC GARDEN CORPORATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $555k · revenue +74%
  • NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $470k · revenue +26%
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $250k · revenue +78%

Funded once

  • PF
    PAC FUND FOR CITY OF NEW YORK
    one grant, 2023 · $100k
  • GI
    GREENPEACE INC
    one grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue +10%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
2
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
3
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
4
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
5
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
6
Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden Inc

We harness the power of plants for humankind and share the joy and beauty of tropical gardening with everyone. fairchild tropical botanic garden is a museum of tropical plants within a world famous, 83-acre designed landscape. it was…

Environment
7
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
8
New York Hall of Science

Nysci's mission is to nurture generations of passionate learners, critical thinkers, and active citizens through design make play - an approach to learning and engagement that is deeply rooted in research on stem learning and guides the…

Arts & Culture
9
The Adler Planetarium

The adler planetarium ('adler') is a not-for-profit cultural institution whose mission is to connect people to the universe and each other under the sky we all share. it aspires to be the world's premier center for engaging in astronomy…

Arts & Culture
10
The Population Council Inc

We generate ideas, produce evidence, and design solutions to improve the lives of underserved populations around the world. we take a multidisciplinary, intergenerational, life-cycle approach that contributes to (see schedule o)four global…

International
11
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
12
Museum of the City of New York

The museum of the city of new york fosters understanding of the distinctive nature of urban life in the world's most influential metropolis. it engages visitors by celebrating, documenting, and interpreting the city's past, present, and…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The New York Public Library Astor Lenox and Tilden Foundations; the most unlike its peers is Pets are Wonderful Support Inc dba Paws. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 65 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
32/32
Grantees still filing
25/32
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $240,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOODTHE SALVATION ARMY: $220,000 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYHABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $150,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITYBROOKLYN MUSEUM OF ART: $150,000 · OtherBROOKLYN MUSEUM OF ARTSISTERS OF MERCY: $125,000 · OtherSISTERS OF MERCYST ANN AND THE HOLY TRINITY: $120,000 · OtherST ANN AND THE HOLY TRINITYGRACE CHURCH: $113,400 · OtherGRACE CHURCHPAC FUND FOR CITY OF NEW YORK: $100,000 · OtherLGBT COMMUNITY CENTER: $88,000 · OtherSERVICES AND ADVOCACY FOR GAY LESBIAN BISEXUAL AND TRANSGENDER ELDERS INC: $71,000 · OtherMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $80,000 · Other+34 more: $665,700 · Other+34 moreBROOKLYN BOTANIC GARDEN CORPORATION: $555,000 · EnvironmentBROOKLYN BOTANIC GARDEN CO…NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $470,000 · EnvironmentNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE …ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $250,000 · HealthST JUDE C…BREAKTHROUGH T1D: $85,000 · HealthBREAKTHRO…PINES CARE CENTER INC: $15,500 · Health+1 more: $10,000 · HealthMANHATTAN SCHOOL OF MUSIC: $100,000 · Arts & CultureTHE BROOKLYN INSTITUTE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES: $60,000 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM OF JEWISH HERITAGE A LIVING MEMORIAL TO THE HOLOCAUST: $60,000 · Arts & CultureThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $60,000 · Arts & CultureFILM FORUM INC: $20,000 · Arts & Culture+2 more: $3,500 · Arts & CultureGOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC: $120,000 · Food & NutritionCITY HARVEST INC: $90,000 · Food & NutritionBROOKLYN PUBLIC LIBRARY: $100,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $75,000 · Education+1 more: $5,000 · EducationTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $127,500 · AnimalsPets are Wonderful Support Inc dba PAWS: $10,000 · Animals
Other$2,123,100Environment$1,025,000Health$360,500Arts & Culture$303,500Food & Nutrition$210,000Education$180,000Animals$137,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBROOKLYN BOTANIC GARDEN CORPORATION: $555,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $470,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $250,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $127,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC: $120,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetBROOKLYN PUBLIC LIBRARY: $100,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMANHATTAN SCHOOL OF MUSIC: $100,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCITY HARVEST INC: $90,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $85,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $80,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $75,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSERVICES AND ADVOCACY FOR GAY LESBIAN BISEXUAL AND TRANSGENDER ELDERS INC: $71,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $65,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BROOKLYN INSTITUTE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES: $60,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMUSEUM OF JEWISH HERITAGE A LIVING MEMORIAL TO THE HOLOCAUST: $60,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $60,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLONG BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $35,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetGREENPEACE INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFILM FORUM INC: $20,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetLAMBDA LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUCATION FUND INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE HOPE PROGRAM INC: $18,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPINES CARE CENTER INC: $15,500 over 6y, 2.6% of budgetPULMONARY WELLNESS FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetPets are Wonderful Support Inc dba PAWS: $10,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetTHE PINES FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe New York Public Library Astor Lenox and Tilden Foundations: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMISIONEROS DEL CAMINO INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTHE CHILDRENS STOREFRONT: $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFIRE ISLAND PINES ARTS PROJECT INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BROOKLYN BOTANIC GARDEN CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds GOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC ↗
  • Who funds BROOKLYN PUBLIC LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds MANHATTAN SCHOOL OF MUSIC ↗
  • Who funds CITY HARVEST INC ↗
  • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds SERVICES AND ADVOCACY FOR GAY LESBIAN BISEXUAL AND TRANSGENDER ELDERS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds THE BROOKLYN INSTITUTE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES ↗
  • Who funds MUSEUM OF JEWISH HERITAGE A LIVING MEMORIAL TO THE HOLOCAUST ↗
  • Who funds The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds LONG BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GREENPEACE INC ↗
  • Who funds FILM FORUM INC ↗
  • Who funds LAMBDA LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUCATION FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HOPE PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds PINES CARE CENTER INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA7.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Clark R Green Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Clark R Green Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Trustees of Boston University: 12% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 65 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Clark R Green’s filings →

More from the funding graph