· Private foundation
Clarence H & Anna E Lutz Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 79% of CLARENCE H & ANNA E LUTZ FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k4 grants · $27k
- $10k–50k19 grants · $332k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CHILDRENS ATTENTION HOME | $40,000 |
| BEAUTIFUL PLACES ALLIANCE | $40,000 |
| CAROLINA COMMUNITY CARE HOSPICE | $25,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $20,000 |
| LANCASTER CHILDRENS HOME | $20,000 |
| PILGRIMS INN | $20,000 |
| CHESTER COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE | $20,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $20,000 |
| SHOWTIME THEATRE COMPANY | $15,000 |
| BATTERED BUT NOT BROKEN | $15,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $15,000 |
| CHESTER CO ANIMAL CONTROL | $11,000 |
| CLEMSON UNIVERSITY 4-H | $11,000 |
| I58 | $10,000 |
| TRINITY BAPTIST CHURCH | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $80k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 25% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
16 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 48% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $188k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CACHILDREN'S ATTENTION HOME INC3× · 2021–2024 · $90k · revenue +112%
- LCLANCASTER CHILDRENS HOME2× · 2023–2024 · $60k · revenue +86%
- PIPILGRIMS INN INC2× · 2023–2024 · $38k · revenue +5%
Funded once
- CSCHESTER STATE PARK BEAUTIFUL PLACESone grant, 2022 · $50k
- LHLEWISVILLE HIGH SCHOOLone grant, 2023 · $26k
- CACHILDRENS ATTENTION HOME ROCK HILLone grant, 2023 · $25k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Carolina Teen Center is a prevention and education year-round after-school and summer program that services youth and their families. Literacy programs, tutoring, life skills, mentoring, positive peer groups, conflict resolution skills,…
Provision of various services for the elderly and transportation services for the citizens of newberry county.
Group home providing long term and emergency care to youth in the care of the south carolina department of social services serving youth ages 13-20.
Serve clients with intellectual and developmental disabilities within york county, south carolina.
To help the underpriviledged senior community in the charleston, sc area.
To promote the mental social and physical welfare of seniors in Union County SC. To operate senior centers providing group dining home delivered meals transportation homemaker services and material support to seniors 60 and older.
Carolina adoption services provides international and domestic adoption services, foster care, home studies, and post adoption support for children, youth and adoptive families.
To provide transportation 24/7 to seniors 60 years and older and to visually impaired individuals of any age
The crispus attucks association of york, pennsylvania is a comprehensive non-profit entity that provides education services, human services, community development and affordable housing that enhances the quality of life for a diverse…
To offer programs & services to older persons so they can stay in their own homes and remain independent.
Care of abused and neglected children.
General assistance to help families experiencing homelessness and low-income families achieve sustaiinable independence through a community-based response.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Attention Home Inc and the most unlike its peers is G R a S P. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 67 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CAROLINA COMMUNITY CARE INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S ATTENTION HOME INC ↗
- Who funds LANCASTER CHILDRENS HOME ↗
- Who funds BATTERED BUT NOT BROKEN ↗
- Who funds Beautiful Places Alliance ↗
- Who funds PILGRIMS INN INC ↗
- Who funds SHOWTIME THEATRE COMPANY ↗
- Who funds Winthrop University Foundation ↗
- Who funds YORK PREPARATORY ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds RIDEABILITY THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds SENIOR SERVICES INC OF CHESTER COUNTY ↗
- Who funds YORK COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING INC ↗
- Who funds G R A S P ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Springs Close Foundation Inc · Duke Energy Foundation · Comporium Foundation Inc · United Way of Chester County In · Nutramax Family Foundation · Foundation for the Carolinas · The Junior Welfare League Inc · United Way of York County SC · York Electric Trust Inc · Community Partnership Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Clarence H & Anna E Lutz Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.