How much did CITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS grant in FY2024?

CITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS reported 27 grants totaling $19,520,435 in its FY2024 IRS filing.

Where is CITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS based?

CITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS is based in NY.

CITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS

Foundation Dossiers Also receives grants — funding profile →

· Public charity

CITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS

To provide a lifeline of nutritious food and human company to homebound elderly new yorkers.

$20M

Granted FY2024

Grants

Communities

$1.9M

Largest

01What you fund

0181% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2018–2024.

Human Services$65MFood & Nutrition$3.1MRecreation & Sports$934kOther$16M

03FY2024 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k3 grants · $23k
$10k–50k2 grants · $65k
$50k–250k7 grants · $1.1M
$250k+15 grants · $9.5M

$310,092

Median grant

States reached

$89M

Total assets

Largest grants

RISEBORO COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIPS$1,925,755
REGIONAL AID FOR INTERIM NEEDS INC$981,936
JASA BROOKLYN MEALS-ON-WHEELS$973,909
HEALTHY SENIOR SELECT - MEALS ON WHEELS$940,868
ENCORE SENIOR CENTER$730,374
STANLEY ISAACS NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER$538,954
MEALS-ON-WHEELS OF STATEN ISLAND$515,290
CCNS SOUTHWEST QUEENS SENIOR SERVICES$439,190
BAY RIDGE CENTER INC$411,318
QUEENS COMMUNITY HOUSE SENIOR CENTER$407,619
FLORENCE E SMITH SENIOR SERVICES$370,594
CCNS WESTERN QUEENS HDML PROGRAM$350,085
CCNS NORTHEAST QUEENS HOME DELIVERED MEAL PROGRAM$338,441
CHARLES A WALBURG MULTI-SERVICE ORGANIZATION INC$310,092
PETER CARDELLA SENIOR CITIZEN CENTER$296,417

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $64.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 19% — the area typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$84M · 35 repeat orgs$653 to everyone else

35 repeat relationships — 23 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$84M

$653

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%

+141%

Still filing today

89%

100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesFood & NutritionRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

RC
RISEBORO COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIPS
7× · 2018–2024 · $11M · revenue +168%
RA
REGIONAL AID FOR INTERIM NEEDS INC
7× · 2018–2024 · $10M · revenue +13%
CW
CCNS WESTERN QUEENS HDML PROGRAM
7× · 2018–2024 · $9.0M · revenue +9%

Funded once

UJ
UNITED JEWISH COUNCIL ADULT LUNCH CLUBgraduated
one grant, 2019 · $653 · revenue +141%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Jewish Home of Central New York Senior

To assure maximum independence and dignity for residents, with a broad range of health, residential, and community services

Housing & Shelter

Home Health Services of Wjcs Inc

Home health services of wjcs is a ny state licensed home care service agency, hhs provides the highest quality services supporting older adults in aging in place while maintaining independence and preserving their dignity.

—

Jewish Home of Central New York

Jewish home of central new york residential living's mission is to assure maximum independence and dignity offering a broad range of the highest quality of health, residential and community services. jewish home is committed to maintaining…

Human Services

United Jewish Council of the East Side Home Attendant Service Corpor

United jewish council of the east side home attendant services corp has contracted with various mco's and mltc's to provide home care services to disabled and/or elder individuals. as of march 1, 2014 the agency terminated its contract for…

—

Hebrew Health Care Inc

Provision of exceptional health care & aging services tailored to each individual.

Health

Kendal At Ithaca Inc

Continuing care retirement community serving older adults in a mutually supportive environment.

Human Services

Jewish Community Housing Corporation of

To provide residential housing options with services to senior citizens.

Human Services

Senior Community Services Inc

To provide services that promote active and meaningful aging and remain in the community.

Human Services

Jewish Home Lifecare Community Services

Our mission is to empower older adults to enhance purpose and well-being through a portfolio of innovative health care services.

International

Leadingage New York Inc

Leadingage new york represents not-for-profit, mission-driven and public continuing care providers, including nursing homes, senior housing, adult care facilities, continuing care retirement communities, assisted living and community…

Civil Rights

Senior Citizens Council of Clinton

Provide programs and nutrition for senior citizens

—

The Neighborhood Self-Help

Neighborhood s.h.o.p.p. is a multi-service agency, servicing seniors residing in bronx.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is East Side House Inc and the most unlike its peers is Wayside Outreach Development Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 52 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

3%1/36

the rest of the field

10%

4,264/44,501

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

34 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

32/34

Grantees still filing

30/34

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Human Services$64,573,110Other$15,693,717Food & Nutrition$3,067,598Recreation & Sports$933,638

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Robin Hood FoundationNY37.6× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Robin Hood Foundation · Food Bank for New York City · Mother Cabrini Health Foundation Inc · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · The United Neighborhood Houses · Brooklyn Community Foundation · The New York Community Trust · Isaac H Tuttle Fund · Amazin' Mets Foundation Inc · Marty and Dorothy Silverman Foundation · Booth Ferris Foundation Xxxxx4008 · Lily Auchincloss Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation CITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: CHARLES A WALBURG MULTI-SERVICE ORGANIZATION INC.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

high risk

~2 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 4 filed years.

Track record & reputation

high risk

4 years of Form 990 filings, no recent filing.

Legal standing

medium risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 237337180 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on CHARLES A WALBURG MULTI-SERVICE ORGANIZATION INC, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 2 months of cash on hand.
FlagSustained operations— No recent filing on record.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 24% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Citymeals-On-Wheels?

Find your warmest path to Citymeals-On-Wheels through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

CITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

34 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Citymeals-On-Wheels?

More from the funding graph

CITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

34 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Citymeals-On-Wheels?

More from the funding graph