Loading…
· Public charity
CITRUS COUNTY COMMUNITY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC
To award grants to groups and organizations that establish programs, research, or initiatives that promote the health or satisfy the medical needs of the residents of citrus county, florida.
$345k
Granted FY2024
8
Grants
1
Communities
$80k
Largest
01What you fund
0181% classified
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2018–2024.
Human Services$1.1MCrime & Legal$148kHealth$113kFood & Nutrition$95kEducation$21kOther$352k
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2019
healthyempowerwomenapproachpartners
2020
supplieschurchhungerfood
2021
supplieschurchhungerfood
2022
educationvision screening
2023
partnerships
2024
—
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2024 · 8 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k5 grants · $152k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $188k
$42,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$15M
Total assets
Largest grants
- KEY TRAINING CENTER$80,000
- CITRUS COUNTY CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER INC$58,000
- COMMUNITY FOOD BANK$50,000
- CITRUS COUNTY ABUSE SHELTER INC$42,000
- UNITED WAY OF CITRUS COUNTY INC$33,000
- NATURE COAST MINISTRIES$32,000
- CITRUS COUNTY HARVEST INC$30,000
- HPH HOSPICE$15,000
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $1.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15% — the area typically sits at 13%. 76% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
05
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 8% of CITRUS COUNTY COMMUNITY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in FL; read by stated purpose it is 93% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
CITRUS COUNTY COMMUNITY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INClessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient addressRecipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
83%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.5M · 15 repeat orgs$312k to everyone else
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +51% since the first grant, against +49% for the ones you funded once.
15 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
15
8
Total granted
$1.5M
$199k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+51%
+49%
Still filing today
87%
63%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $113k went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
Human ServicesHealthFood & NutritionCrime & LegalEducationOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PAPREGNANCY AND FAMILY LIFE CENTER5× · 2018–2022 · $351k · revenue +209% · 41% of their budget
- HHHPH HOSPICE3× · 2020–2024 · $278k · revenue +50%
- CCCITRUS COUNTY CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER INC3× · 2022–2024 · $148k · revenue +181%
Funded once
- WFWELL FLORIDA COUNCILgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $57k · revenue +67%
- WFWIL-POWER FOUNDATION INCgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $47k · revenue +48% · 32% of their budget
- ILINVERNESS LIONS CLUBone grant, 2022 · $25k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Chamber of Commerce Citrus County
Promotion of citrus county
Community Improvement
2
The Path of Citrus County Inc
The path of citrus county seeks to provide a christian living environment that allows true rehabilitation for homeless individuals in citrus county, florida. the organization offers long-term stays and allows those seeking assistance to be…
Unclassified
3
Community Health Centers Inc
The mission of community health centers is to provide quality and compassionate primary healthcare services to central florida's diverse communities.
—
4
Life Choices Medical Center
Christian organization offering a hopeful future by empowering women and men to make life-affirming decisions
Human Services
5
Habitat for Humanity of Citrus
Build affordable housing for qualified low income families.
—
6
Central Coast Pregnancy Center
To support, help and encourage all women facing a pregnancy with concerns and also to teach our youth the risks of sexual activity outside of marriage.
Health
7
Choices Clinics Inc
Crisis pregnancy support for the area of brandon, florida
Health
8
Crisis Pregnancy Center of Tidewater
Helping women & families involved in crisis pregnancies
Health
9
Community Sharing Christian Center Inc
Food Pantry.
—
10
Life Choices Care
Life choices care exits to minister to the underserved in our community who are in need of pregancy services and comprehensive womenaposs health care. we serve our patients with love, compassion and a commitment to excellence so that we…
—
11
We Care of Central Florida Inc
To provide volunteer specialty medical care to low income, uninsured residents of polk county who are ineligible for all other sources of medical care, including medicaid and polk healthcare plan.
Civil Rights
12
Life Choices Medical Clinic
Life choices medical clinic exists to minister to the underserved in our community who are in need of pregnancy services and comprehensive womenaposs health care. we serve our patients with love, compassion and a committment to excellence…
Unclassified
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Citrus County Family Resource Cente and the most unlike its peers is Citrus County Abuse Shelter Associa. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
Closures · last 5 years
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
orgs you fund
0.0%0/25
the rest of the field
12%
60/517
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
06the grantee network
20 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
15/20
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Human Services$1,091,349Other$352,000Crime & Legal$148,108Health$113,400Food & Nutrition$94,788Education$21,000
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PREGNANCY AND FAMILY LIFE CENTER ↗
- Who funds HPH HOSPICE ↗
- Who funds CITRUS COUNTY CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds THE COMMUNITY FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds ASPIRE RELATIONSHIP CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds NATURE COAST MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds CITRUS COUNTY ABUSE SHELTER INC ↗
- Who funds KEY TRAINING CENTER ↗
- Who funds CITRUS COUNTY HARVEST INC ↗
- Who funds WELL FLORIDA COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds CITRUS PREGNANCY CENTER ↗
- Who funds WIL-POWER FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds MID FLORIDA HOMELESS COALITION ↗
- Who funds CITRUS UNITED BASKET INC ↗
- Who funds WE CARE FOOD PANTRY INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF CITRUS COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds CITRUS COUNTY FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDHOOD DEVELOPMENT SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds INVERNESS LIONS CLUB OF CITRUS COUNTY ↗
- Who funds DOCTORS FREE CLINIC OF CITRUS COUNTY INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
US Family Foundation IncFL26.8× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: US Family Foundation Inc · Duke Energy Foundation · Black Diamond Foundation Inc · Capital City Bank Group · Community Foundation of Tampa Bay Inc · Feeding America Tampa Bay Inc · Thrivent Charitable Impact & Investing · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation CITRUS COUNTY COMMUNITY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
- Aspire Relationship Center Inc — 70% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: DOCTORS FREE CLINIC OF CITRUS COUNTY INC.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
insufficient risk
Limited financial data in public filings.
Track record & reputation
low risk
5 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 3.6× since.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 843983901 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on DOCTORS FREE CLINIC OF CITRUS COUNTY INC, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue grew over the period.
- WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 69% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Citrus County Community Charitable Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Citrus County Community Charitable Foundation Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines