Skip to content

· Private foundation

Citrin Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.4M
Granted FY2025still arriving
21
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$387k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$2.9MEducation$1.8MHealth$963kInternational$83kPhilanthropy$77kSocial Science$42kYouth Development$28kEnvironment$9kOther$0
02FY2025 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $34k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $82k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $529k
  • $250k+2 grants · $748k
$10,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$3.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BROOKLYN INSTITUTE OF ARTS$386,666
BROOKLYN MUSEUM$361,667
HOSPITAL OF SPECIAL SURGERY$240,000
DARTMOUTH COLLEGE$160,000
ASPEN ART MUSEUM$75,000
ANDERSON RANCH CENTER FOR THE ARTS$53,596
YOUNG ARTS$30,000
WASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY$16,120
MOUNT SINAI MEDICAL CENTER$15,000
THE ASPEN INSTITUTE$11,000
CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF MANHATTAN$10,000
BROTHERS FOR LIFE$7,500
ASPEN VALLEY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$5,000
HOOD MUSEUM OF ART$5,000
ROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 58% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%CORNELL UNIVERSITY: $50k → 16%BROOKLYN MUSEUM: $483k → 20%YOUNG ARTS: $30k → 15%ANDERSON RANCH CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $107k → 6%DARTMOUTH COLLEGE: $285k → 10%CORNELL UNIVERSITY: $45k → 16%BROOKLYN INSTITUTE OF ARTS: $387k → 20%ANDERSON RANCH CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $54k → 6%DARTMOUTH COLLEGE: $260k → 10%CORNELL UNIVERSITY: $35k → 16%BROOKLYN MUSEUM: $364k → 20%ANDERSON RANCH CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $43k → 6%DARTMOUTH COLLEGE: $260k → 10%BROOKLYN MUSEUM: $362k → 20%ANDERSON RANCH CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $39k → 6%DARTMOUTH COLLEGE: $260k → 10%BROOKLYN MUSEUM: $167k → 20%ANDERSON RANCH CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $35k → 6%DARTMOUTH COLLEGE: $260k → 10%BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF NYC INC: $25k → 17%BROOKLYN MUSEUM: $150k → 20%ANDERSON RANCH CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $30k → 6%DARTMOUTH COLLEGE: $165k → 10%BROOKLYN MUSEUM: $100k → 20%ANDERSON RANCH CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $30k → 6%DARTMOUTH COLLEGE: $160k → 10%HOSPITAL OF SPECIAL SURGERY: $243k → 17%BROOKLYN MUSEUM: $56k → 20%WASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY: $16k → 14%ANDERSON RANCH CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $25k → 6%HOSPITAL OF SPECIAL SURGERY: $240k → 17%BROOKLYN MUSEUM: $38k → 20%HOSPITAL OF SPECIAL SURGERY: $240k → 17%ASPEN ART MUSEUM: $75k → 6%HOSPITAL OF SPECIAL SURGERY: $26k → 17%ASPEN ART MUSEUM: $63k → 6%HOSPITAL OF SPECIAL SURGERY: $25k → 17%ASPEN ART MUSEUM: $50k → 6%HOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL SURGERY: $25k → 17%ASPEN ART MUSEUM: $35k → 6%HOSPITAL OF SPECIAL SURGERY: $25k → 17%ASPEN ART MUSEUM: $30k → 6%HOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL SURGERY: $25k → 17%ASPEN FILM: $25k → 6%ASPEN FILM: $25k → 6%HOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL SURGERY: $25k → 17%MOUNT SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $15k → 17%MOUNT SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $15k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
WA
NY
CT
CA
CO
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.8M · 22 repeat orgs$487k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +18% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

22 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
23

Total granted

$3.8M
$95k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
0%

Still filing today

77%
78%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $391k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureInternationalHealthPhilanthropyEducationSocial ScienceOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TB
    THE BROOKLYN INSTITUTE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES
    8× · 2018–2025 · $1.7M · revenue +41%
  • Cornell University
    6× · 2017–2023 · $154k · revenue +59%
  • WI
    WASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY
    6× · 2020–2025 · $66k · revenue +0%

Funded once

  • BB
    BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF NEW YORK CITY INC
    one grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue +17%
  • BE
    BUSINESS EXECUTIVES FOR NATIONAL SECURITY
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +10%
  • WM
    WHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ARTgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +125%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
2
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
3
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
4
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
5
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
6
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
Stony Brook Orthopedic Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
Manhattan University

Manhattan university is an independent catholic instituion of higher learning that embraces qualified men and women of all faiths, cultures, and traditions. the mission of manhattan university is to provide a contemporary, person-centered…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Aspen Institute Inc; the most unlike its peers is Greenwich Hospital. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

38 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 38 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
38/38
Grantees still filing
21/38
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE BROOKLYN INSTITUTE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES: $1,719,332 · Arts & CultureTHE BROOKLYN INSTITUTE OF ARTS AND SCIEN…ASPEN ART MUSEUM: $274,100 · Arts & CultureASPEN ART MUSEUM+10 more: $166,650 · Arts & Culture+10 moreTrustees of Dartmouth College: $1,670,000 · EducationTrustees of Dartmouth CollegeCornell University: $154,000 · EducationCornell University+2 more: $3,000 · EducationHOSPITAL OF SPECIAL SURGERY: $798,500 · OtherHOSPITAL OF SPECIAL SURGERYBROOKLYN INSTITUTE OF ARTS: $386,666 · OtherBROOKLYN INSTITUTE OF ARTSANDERSON RANCH CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $372,441 · OtherANDERSON RANCH CENTER FOR THE AR…HOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL SURGERY: $75,000 · Other+15 more: $79,450 · OtherTHE MOUNT SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $60,000 · HealthASPEN VALLEY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $21,500 · Health+3 more: $5,500 · HealthWASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY: $66,120 · InternationalBUSINESS EXECUTIVES FOR NATIONAL SECURITY: $10,000 · International+3 more: $7,000 · InternationalROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION: $32,500 · PhilanthropyASPEN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $31,200 · PhilanthropyUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $5,000 · Philanthropy+1 more: $1,000 · PhilanthropyTHE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC: $41,000 · Social Science+1 more: $500 · Social Science
Arts & Culture$2,160,082Education$1,827,000Other$1,712,057Health$87,000International$83,120Philanthropy$69,700Social Science$41,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE BROOKLYN INSTITUTE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES: $1,719,332 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetTrustees of Dartmouth College: $1,670,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetASPEN ART MUSEUM: $274,100 over 7y, 2.1% of budgetCornell University: $154,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY: $66,120 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MOUNT SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $60,000 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetASPEN FILM: $50,500 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetNATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR ADVANCEMENT IN THE ARTS INC: $44,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC: $41,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION: $32,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetASPEN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $31,200 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF NEW YORK CITY INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetASPEN VALLEY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $21,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF MANHATTAN: $21,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJAZZ AT ASPEN-SNOWMASS: $14,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBrothers for Life: $11,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBUSINESS EXECUTIVES FOR NATIONAL SECURITY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOLOMON R GUGGENHEIM FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetASPEN CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES: $9,200 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOLD OAKS FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetMUSEUM OF ARTS AND DESIGN: $2,650 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHEATRE ASPEN: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCITY HARVEST INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF RABIN MEDICAL CENTER: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGREENWICH HOSPITAL: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNew York University: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH INSTITUTE FOR NATIONAL SECURITY OF AMERICA: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSPARKYOUTH NYC INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICA NEEDS YOU: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFILM AT LINCOLN CENTER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ULI FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetASPEN VALLEY SKISNOWBOARD CLUB INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY17.6× affinity7 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Citrin Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Citrin Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • National Foundation for Advancement in the Arts Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Greenwich Hospital: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 51 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Citrin Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph