Skip to content
Cinta Trust at a glance

· Private foundation

Cinta Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$46k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Health$74kReligion$69kHuman Services$38kInternational$12kEducation$11kHousing & Shelter$10kPhilanthropy$6kArts & Culture$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $34k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $12k
$5,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$841k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHRIST FELLOWSHIP CHURCH INC$12,000
KAIROS PRISON MINISTRY$5,000
OPEN HEARTS FOR ORPHANS$5,000
ENGAGE CHURCH$5,000
LOW LIGHT OF THE WORLD FOUNDATION$5,000
HANDS AND FEET FOUNDATION$5,000
LET'S GO MISSIONS$5,000
LOVING ONE BY ONE MINISTRIES INC$2,500
PEDIATRIC ONCOLOGY SUPPORT TEAM$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $28k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 93% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%THE NO MORE FOUNDATION: $2k → 11%HANDS AND FEET FOUNDATION: $12k → 11%HANDS AND FEET FOUNDATION: $5k → 11%HANDS AND FEET FOUNDATION: $4k → 11%OPEN HEARTS FOR ORPHANS: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ID
NY
IN
NJ
CA
CO
MD
DE
AZ
TN
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$180k · 12 repeat orgs$47k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
7

Total granted

$180k
$27k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+28%

Still filing today

58%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 56% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
PhilanthropyHealthHuman ServicesEducationHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JD
    JOE DIMAGGIO CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2019–2023 · $18k · revenue +17%
  • LO
    Loving One By One Ministries Inc
    5× · 2019–2025 · $14k · revenue +56%
  • SL
    SEAN LOCKE 24 FOUNDATION
    2× · 2021–2022 · $8k · revenue +129%

Funded once

  • ZM
    ZOE MINISTRIES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +30%
  • LG
    LESEA GLOBAL FEED THE HUNGRY INC
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue 0%
  • LP
    LEAD PROGRAM
    one grant, 2023 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Kids for Him

assisting orphans and missionary in need

International
2
Hands of Hope the Foundation of Cancer and Hematology Centers of Western Mi
Philanthropy
3
Kim International Medical Volunteer Foundation Inc

To provide medical vouunteers where needed

Public Safety & Disaster
4
Starfish Kenya Inc

Starfish Kenya is dedicated to making the words "Jesus love me, this I know" a reality in the lives of the most vulnerable children in Kenya. This is accomplished through the efforts of providing care and education.

International
5
Global Reach Miracle Foundation
Philanthropy
6
Keenan's Kids Foundation Inc
Philanthropy
7
Be Hope International
Religion
8
Never Let Go Ministries
Health
9
Now I am Known Foundation
Human Services
10
His Heart Foundation
—
11
Katie Foundation
Health
12
New Hope Foundation
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Joe Dimaggio Children's Hospital Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Extraordinary Charities Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
8/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHRIST FELLOWSHIP CHURCH INC: $52,000 · OtherCHRIST FELLOWSHIP CHURCH INCCHRISTIAN MEDICAL & DENTAL SOCIETY: $10,000 · OtherCHRISTIAN MEDICAL & DENTAL SOCIETYKAIROS PRISON MINISTRY INTERNATIONAL INC: $10,000 · OtherKAIROS PRISON MINISTRY INTERNATIONAL INCMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION: $5,400 · OtherENGAGE CHURCH: $5,000 · OtherLET'S GO MISSIONS: $5,000 · OtherLOW LIGHT OF THE WORLD FOUNDATION: $5,000 · OtherLEAD PROGRAM: $3,775 · OtherCompassion International Incorporated: $4,000 · Other+2 more: $4,500 · OtherKAY'S FOUNDATION: $32,500 · PhilanthropyKAY'S FOUNDATIONLESEA GLOBAL FEED THE HUNGRY INC: $5,000 · PhilanthropyLESEA GLOBAL FEED T…+1 more: $1,277 · PhilanthropyHANDS AND FEET FOUNDATION: $20,775 · Human ServicesHANDS AND FEE…OPEN HEARTS FOR ORPHANS INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesOPEN HEARTS F…THE NO MORE FOUNDATION: $2,000 · Human ServicesTHE NO MORE F…JOE DIMAGGIO CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $17,500 · HealthJOE DIMAGGIO…PEDIATRIC ONCOLOGY SUPPORT TEAM INC: $4,000 · HealthPEDIATRIC ON…National Kidney Foundation Inc: $2,900 · HealthNational Kid…Loving One By One Ministries Inc: $13,530 · EducationZOE MINISTRIES INC: $10,000 · Housing & ShelterSEAN LOCKE 24 FOUNDATION: $7,500 · Youth Development
Other$104,675Philanthropy$38,777Human Services$27,775Health$24,400Education$13,530Housing & Shelter$10,000Youth Development$7,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetKAY'S FOUNDATION: $32,500 over 5y, 14% of budgetHANDS AND FEET FOUNDATION: $20,775 over 3y, 4.6% of budgetJOE DIMAGGIO CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $17,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetLoving One By One Ministries Inc: $13,530 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetZOE MINISTRIES INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetSEAN LOCKE 24 FOUNDATION: $7,500 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetLESEA GLOBAL FEED THE HUNGRY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOPEN HEARTS FOR ORPHANS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetPEDIATRIC ONCOLOGY SUPPORT TEAM INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetNational Kidney Foundation Inc: $2,900 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetREVERENT RHYTHMS: $2,500 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetTHE NO MORE FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEXTRAORDINARY CHARITIES INC: $1,277 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Charities Aid Foundat…Renaissance Charitabl…Natl Christian Charit…Paypal Charitable Giv…The Bank of America C…Vanguard Charitable E…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
Charities Aid Foundation AmericaVA11.4× affinity6 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Charities Aid Foundation America · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Cinta Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Cinta Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 21%
  • The No More Foundation: 33% of income from government
  • Sean Locke 24 Foundation: 21% of income from government
  • Zoe Ministries Inc: 6% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Cinta’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home