· Private foundation
Cinta Trust
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k8 grants · $34k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $12k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CHRIST FELLOWSHIP CHURCH INC | $12,000 |
| OPEN HEARTS FOR ORPHANS | $5,000 |
| HANDS AND FEET FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| LOW LIGHT OF THE WORLD FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| LET'S GO MISSIONS | $5,000 |
| ENGAGE CHURCH | $5,000 |
| KAIROS PRISON MINISTRY | $5,000 |
| LOVING ONE BY ONE MINISTRIES INC | $2,500 |
| PEDIATRIC ONCOLOGY SUPPORT TEAM | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–25, $28k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 93% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
12 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 56% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- JDJOE DIMAGGIO CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC5× · 2019–2023 · $18k · revenue +17%
- LOLoving One By One Ministries Inc5× · 2019–2025 · $14k · revenue +56%
- SLSEAN LOCKE 24 FOUNDATION2× · 2021–2022 · $8k · revenue +129%
Funded once
- ZMZOE MINISTRIES INCgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +30%
- LGLESEA GLOBAL FEED THE HUNGRY INCgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +49%
- LPLEAD PROGRAMone grant, 2023 · $4k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
assisting orphans and missionary in need
To provide medical vouunteers where needed
Starfish Kenya is dedicated to making the words "Jesus love me, this I know" a reality in the lives of the most vulnerable children in Kenya. This is accomplished through the efforts of providing care and education.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Joe Dimaggio Children's Hospital Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Extraordinary Charities Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds KAY'S FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HANDS AND FEET FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds JOE DIMAGGIO CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Loving One By One Ministries Inc ↗
- Who funds ZOE MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds SEAN LOCKE 24 FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LESEA GLOBAL FEED THE HUNGRY INC ↗
- Who funds OPEN HEARTS FOR ORPHANS INC ↗
- Who funds PEDIATRIC ONCOLOGY SUPPORT TEAM INC ↗
- Who funds Compassion International Incorporated ↗
- Who funds National Kidney Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds REVERENT RHYTHMS ↗
- Who funds THE NO MORE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds EXTRAORDINARY CHARITIES INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Charities Aid Foundation America · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Cinta Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- The No More Foundation — 33% of income from government
- Sean Locke 24 Foundation — 21% of income from government
- Zoe Ministries Inc — 6% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.