How much did CINELLI FAMILY FOUNDATION grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 84% of CINELLI FAMILY FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2022

—

2023

cancer patientsbreast cancerresearchpatients undergoingfinancial

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

$10k–50k10 grants · $121k
$50k–250k4 grants · $334k
$250k+2 grants · $1.3M

$11,000

Median grant

States reached

$257M

Total assets

Largest grants

UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS ENDOWMENT ASSO$1,000,000
UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS ENDOWMENT ASSO$250,000
THE JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY - DR$104,000
CURATORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSO$100,000
DUKE UNIVERSITY$80,000
KHAN ACADEMY$50,000
CHEMO BUDDIES$22,000
THE HOPE CENTER$11,000
STOMP OUT BULLYING$11,000
LMH HEALTH FOUNDATION$11,000
PREVENT CANCER FOUNDATION$11,000
STAND FOR THE SILENT INC$11,000
YOUTH FIRST$11,000
BISHOP MIEGE$11,000
TOUCH INC$11,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–24, $44k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16% — the area typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

8%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$177k · 4 repeat orgs$2.1M to everyone else

4 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$177k

$504k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%

+54%

Still filing today

100%

42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 6% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.6M went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

HealthEducationHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentCrime & LegalPublic Safety & DisasterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

KA
KHAN ACADEMY
2× · 2023–2024 · $100k · revenue -47%
CB
CHEMO BUDDIES
2× · 2023–2024 · $33k · revenue +225%
PC
PREVENT CANCER FOUNDATION
2× · 2023–2024 · $22k · revenue +11%

Funded once

KE
KU ENDOWMENT - CANCER RESEARCH FACILITY
one grant, 2023 · $266k
JH
JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY
one grant, 2023 · $100k
JH
JOHN HOPKINS UNIVERSITY
one grant, 2022 · $25k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

CureCervicalCancer

Dedicated to the early detection and prevention of cervical cancer around the globe for the women who need it most.

International

Lets Win Pancreatic Cancer Foundation

Let's win pancreatic cancer foundation is a web-based platform that enables doctors, scientists and patients to share fast-breaking information on potentially life-saving pancreatic cancer treatments & clinical trials.

Health

Brem Foundation to Defeat Breast Cancer

Brem Foundation to Defeat Breast Cancer champions early detection of breast cancer to improve health outcomes for all through innovation, education, equitable access, and targeted advocacy.

Health

Commonwealth Cancer Consortium Inc

Break through cancer is a foundation dedicated to supporting translational research in the most difficult to treat cancers. our partner organizations are among the top cancer research centers and together, represent some of the most…

—

Cancer Pathways

The mission of Cancer Pathways is to ensure that no one has to face cancer alone. Cancer Pathways offers programs of educational, supportive, and community options for men, women, teens and children living with cancer along with their…

Human Services

Breast Cancer Prevention Partners

Founded in 1992, Breast Cancer Prevention Partners (BCPP) works to prevent breast cancer by eliminating exposure to toxic chemicals and radiation linked to the disease. (CONTINUED ON SCHEDULE O)

Health

Breast Cancer Resource Center

The mission of bcrc is to empower those affected by breast cancer with personalized support and compassion.

Health

Breast Cancer Action

Breast cancer action's mission is to achieve health justice for all women at risk of and living with breast cancer.

Unclassified

Breast Cancer Alliance Inc

To improve survival rates and quality of life for those impacted by breast cancer through better prevention, early detection, treatment and cure. to promote these goals, we invest in innovative research, breast surgery fellowships,…

Health

Latinas Contra Cancer

To service Latina cancer patients by creating an inclusive health care system around issues of breast and other cancers.

Health

Womens Cancer Resource Center

The Womens Cancer Resource Center improves equitable access to cancer information, support and care. We help people with cancer navigate through the often overwhelming health care system so that they can get the appropriate care and…

Unclassified

Breastcancerorg

To provide the most reliable, complete & up-to-date breast cancer & breast health information

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Living Beyond Breast Cancer and the most unlike its peers is 826 National Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

16 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

16/16

Grantees still filing

13/16

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$1,925,000Education$191,000Health$99,000Human Services$44,000Youth Development$11,000Public Safety & Disaster$11,000Crime & Legal$11,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Charities Aid Foundation AmericaVA11.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Charities Aid Foundation America · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation CINELLI FAMILY FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

1get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: TOUCH INC.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 263989768 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on TOUCH INC, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 20% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Cinelli Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Cinelli Family Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

CINELLI FAMILY FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

16 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Cinelli Family Foundation?

More from the funding graph

CINELLI FAMILY FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

16 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Cinelli Family Foundation?

More from the funding graph