Skip to content
Cicp Foundation Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Cicp Foundation Inc

Cicp foundation, inc.

$4.7M
Granted FY2025still arriving
26
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$2.7M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$15MScience & Tech$12MEmployment$5.7MYouth Development$5.4MEducation$4.0MSocial Science$3.0MCommunity Improvement$1.4MFood & Nutrition$1.0MOther$0
02FY2025 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k17 grants · $382k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $524k
  • $250k+2 grants · $3.8M
$25,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$55M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
INDIANA UNIVERSITY$2,661,751
CENTRAL INDIANA CORPORATE PARTNERSHIP INC$1,158,622
REGION 10 WORKFORCE BOARD INC DBA SOUTHERN INDIANA WORKS$115,000
ALLIANCE FOR STRATEGIC GROWTH INC DBA EASTERN INDIANA WORKS$115,000
CRAWFORDSVILLE COMM SCHOOLS$100,000
SOUTHERN INDIANA EDUCATION CENTER INC$100,000
THE GLOBAL INSTITUTE ON INNOVATION DISTRICTS INC$94,213
VINCENNES UNIVERSITY$46,970
THE HEALTH & HOSPITAL CORPORATION OF MARION COUNTY DBA ESKENAZI HEALTH$46,213
LEADERSHIP INDIANAPOLIS INC$38,900
INDIANA HEALTH INFORMATION EXCHANGE INC$29,534
THE RAND CORPORATION$28,721
THE INDYHUB FOUNDATION INC$25,000
MENTORS OF COLOR INC$20,000
INDIANAPOLIS PRIVATE INDUSTRY COUNCIL INC DBA EMPLOYINDY$17,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $73k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 73% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WHITE'S RESIDENTIAL & FAMILY SERVICES INC: $16k → 12%STARTEDUP FOUNDATION INC: $10k → 5%STARTEDUP FOUNDATION INC: $10k → 5%INDIANAPOLIS URBAN LEAGUE INC: $15k → 16%EARLY LEARNING INDIANA INC: $22k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
IL
MI
IN
CA
CO
VA
NC
DC
AL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 26% of Cicp Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 50% of the giving stays in IN; by stated purpose, 78%.

Cicp Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$44M · 42 repeat orgs$2.2M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +22% since the first grant, against +9% for those funded once.

42 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 28 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

42
40

Total granted

$44M
$1.9M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+9%

Still filing today

60%
65%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $267k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Community ImprovementEmploymentEducationPublic BenefitHuman ServicesSocial ScienceOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IP
    Indianapolis Private Industry Council
    6× · 2020–2025 · $3.4M · revenue +71%
  • CI
    CENTRAL INDIANA CORPORATE PARTNERSHIP INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $3.0M · revenue +76%
  • TB
    THE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION
    6× · 2019–2024 · $2.0M · revenue +11%

Funded once

  • AI
    AMATROL INC
    one grant, 2017 · $463k
  • GU
    GuideStar USA Inc
    one grant, 2017 · $320k · revenue -91%
  • PI
    Pattern Inc
    one grant, 2024 · $135k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
2
Indiana Economic Development Foundation Inc

To promote industrial and business development, diversification of indiana's economy, and overall economic growth of indiana; to promote the retention, expansion, growth, and modernization of indiana's businesses; to promote the creation…

Community Improvement
3
Cicp Foundation Inc

Cicp foundation, inc. (the foundation) operates exclusively for the benefit of and carries out the mission of central indiana corporate partnership, inc. (cicp) by engaging in and supporting activities in furtherance of purposes that are…

Community Improvement
4
Enroll Indy Inc

Enroll indy helps families choose schools that meet their children's needs by providing a one-stop enrollment process, school information that is relevant and easy to understand, and data to inform school improvement in indianapolis,…

Education
5
Indiana Innovation Council Inc

Promote and educate indiana residents on the state's economic success and positive gains.

—
6
Northeast Indiana Innovation Center Inc

We are a comprehensive entrepreneurial center whose mission is putting business growth, innovation and entrepreneurship to work for northeast indiana

Community Improvement
7
Northeast Indiana Works Inc

The corporation was formed to receive and administer funds for educational, charitable, job training, and workforce development purposes in northeast indiana.

Employment
8
Institute for Defense Analyses

The institute for defense analyses is organized for the purpose of applied research. the institute for defense analyses provides independent and objective scientific and technological expertise to assist national security decision-makers…

Science & Tech
9
Applied Research Institute Inc

Ari was formed to conduct research and foster regional collaboration among indiana's research universities; local, state, and federal government entities; and the philanthropic and corporate sectors in connection with charitable,…

Community Improvement
10
Indiana Veteran Initiative Inc

Partnering with veterans, their families, indiana employers, and communities to facilitate a meaningful transition to civilian life while strengthening indiana's economy.

Public Benefit
11
Indiana Institute of Technology Inc

Indiana tech is a private, independent, and non-denominational university. students are prepared for active participation in the complex, global society of the 21st century and are motivated toward a life of significance and worth. about…

Education
12
Indiana University Alumni Association Inc

The indiana university alumni association activates and supports the global alumni network- encouraging alumni to grow a lifelong connection with indiana university, and inspiring their ongoing generosity toward each other and the…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Center of Workforce Innovations Inc; the most unlike its peers is Mentors of Color. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

62 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 62 of the 95 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
61/62
Grantees still filing
38/62
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Indiana University School of Medicine: $15,599,769 · OtherIndiana University School of MedicineTRUSTEES OF PURDUE UNIVERSITY: $10,742,167 · OtherTRUSTEES OF PURDUE UNIVERSITYSTATE OF INDIANA: $1,750,000 · OtherSTATE OF INDIANA+53 more: $4,266,072 · Other+53 moreUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $7,058,333 · EducationUniversity of No…CAREERWISE COLORADO: $501,942 · EducationCAREERWISE COLOR…+9 more: $259,736 · EducationIndianapolis Private Industry Council: $3,350,978 · EmploymentInstitute for Workforce Excellence Inc: $339,500 · EmploymentALLIANCE FOR STRATEGIC GROWTH INC: $215,000 · EmploymentREGION 10 WORKFORCE BOARD INC: $215,000 · Employment+6 more: $113,045 · EmploymentCENTRAL INDIANA CORPORATE PARTNERSHIP INC: $2,982,978 · Community ImprovementElevate Ventures Inc: $165,000 · Community ImprovementPattern Inc: $135,000 · Community Improvement+8 more: $285,373 · Community ImprovementTHE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION: $1,970,000 · Social ScienceNATIONAL OPINION RESEARCH CENTER: $648,211 · Social ScienceAMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH: $365,000 · Social ScienceINDIANA HEALTH INFORMATION EXCHANGE INC: $1,618,301 · Health+1 more: $5,000 · HealthNINETWELVE INSTITUTE INC: $623,000 · Science & TechResearch Triangle Institute: $445,000 · Science & Tech
Other$32,358,008Education$7,820,011Employment$4,233,523Community Improvement$3,568,351Social Science$2,983,211Health$1,623,301Science & Tech$1,068,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $7,058,333 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetIndianapolis Private Industry Council: $3,350,978 over 6y, 4.1% of budgetCENTRAL INDIANA CORPORATE PARTNERSHIP INC: $2,982,978 over 9y, 11% of budgetTHE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION: $1,970,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetINDIANA HEALTH INFORMATION EXCHANGE INC: $1,618,301 over 4y, 6.4% of budgetNATIONAL OPINION RESEARCH CENTER: $648,211 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNINETWELVE INSTITUTE INC: $623,000 over 2y, 3.7% of budgetCAREERWISE COLORADO: $501,942 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetResearch Triangle Institute: $445,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Rand Corporation: $422,012 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH: $365,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetInstitute for Workforce Excellence Inc: $339,500 over 2y, 10% of budgetGuideStar USA Inc: $320,078 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetNational FFA Foundation Inc: $300,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetALLIANCE FOR STRATEGIC GROWTH INC: $215,000 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetREGION 10 WORKFORCE BOARD INC: $215,000 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetElevate Ventures Inc: $165,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetMetropolitan Indianapolis Public Media Inc: $160,400 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetPattern Inc: $135,000 over 1y, 9.8% of budgetINDY HUB FOUNDATION INC: $110,000 over 3y, 25% of budgetREGIONAL OPPORTUNITY INITIATIVES INC: $107,500 over 2y, 67% of budgetGreater Indianapolis Chamber of Commerce Inc: $101,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetTHE GLOBAL INSTITUTE ON INNOVATION DISTRICTS INC: $94,213 over 1y, 6.4% of budgetLeadership Indianapolis Inc: $85,100 over 3y, 5.3% of budgetNATIONAL HOT ROD ASSOCIATION: $76,800 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPurdue Research Foundation: $68,354 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHEAST INDIANA WORKFORCE INVESTMENT BOARD: $65,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetIVY TECH FOUNDATION INC: $58,725 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHAMILTON COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $57,500 over 1y, 8.3% of budgetEVSC FOUNDATION INC: $57,500 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetNORTHERN INDIANA WORKFORCE BOARD INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetButler University: $48,030 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMENTORS OF COLOR: $41,040 over 3y, 63% of budgetCROSSING NATIONAL INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE CENTER OF WORKFORCE INNOVATIONS INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEARLY LEARNING INDIANA INC: $22,012 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUniversity of Indianapolis: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGreater Indianapolis Chamber of Commerce Foundation Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSTARTEDUP FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetWHITE'S RESIDENTIAL & FAMILY SERVICES INC: $16,442 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTECUMSEH AREA PARTNERSHIP INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGOODWILL LEGACY GROUP INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAGAMORE INSTITUTE INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHORIZON EDUCATION ALLIANCE INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetWESTERN INDIANA WORKFORCE INVESTMENT BOARD INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF STATE DEPARTMENTS OF AGRICULTURE: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNOBLE EDUCATIONAL INITIATIVES INC: $13,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetTEENWORKS INC: $12,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lilly Endowment IncUniversity of Indiana…The Indianapolis Foun…Central Indiana Commu…Richard M Fairbanks F…Regional Opportunity …Lumina Foundation for…Project Lead the Way …Hamilton County Commu…Community Foundation …Institute for Citizen…Nicholas H Noyes Jr M…
Lilly Endowment IncIN41.9× affinity23 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lilly Endowment Inc · University of Indianapolis · The Indianapolis Foundation Inc · Central Indiana Community Foundation Inc · Richard M Fairbanks Foundation Inc · Regional Opportunity Initiatives Inc · Lumina Foundation for Education Inc · Project Lead the Way Inc · Hamilton County Community Foundation Inc · Community Foundation Alliance Inc · Institute for Citizens and Scholars · Nicholas H Noyes Jr Memorial Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Cicp Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Cicp Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 95 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Cicp’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home