How much did CICP FOUNDATION INC grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 58% of CICP FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

agrinovus

2019

young professionalspurdueconexus catapultindianapolisagrinovus

2020

ascend youthbellwetherstudyagrinovusmanufacturingyouth apprenticeship

2021

advance asendasend indiana'sconexus internenable conexusgps bellwetheradvance clintonclinton conexus

2022

participationindiana's workforceesnadvance ascendascend indiana'sindiana's youthconduct

2023

advancement conexusconexus indiana'sindiana's studentstudent runrun businessindiana's modernmodern youth

2024

student industriesconexus indiana'sindiana's studentadvance cicp'sadvance economiceconomyindiana's catapult

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 40 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k3 grants · $21k
$10k–50k20 grants · $311k
$50k–250k12 grants · $1.2M
$250k+5 grants · $5.8M

$25,000

Median grant

States reached

$27M

Total assets

Largest grants

PURDUE UNIVERSITY$2,285,000
INDIANA HEALTH INFORMATION EXCHANGE INC$1,307,060
INDIANAPOLIS PRIVATE INDUSTRY COUNCIL INC DBA EMPLOYINDY$1,066,818
CENTRAL INDIANA CORPORATE PARTNERSHIP INC$829,694
RESEARCH TRIANGLE INSTITUTE INC$352,250
THE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION$200,000
UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME DU LAC$145,333
PATTERN INC$135,000
CAREERWISE COLORADO$118,365
THE RAND CORPORATION$114,000
ALLIANCE FOR STRATEGIC GROWTH INC DBA EASTERN INDIANA WORKS$75,000
CRAWFORDSVILLE COMM SCHOOLS$75,000
SOUTHERN INDIANA EDUCATION CENTER INC$75,000
REGION 10 WORKFORCE BOARD INC DBA SOUTHERN INDIANA WORKS$75,000
INDIANA UNIVERSITY$54,450

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $58k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11% — the area typically sits at 11%. 66% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$47M · 42 repeat orgs$1.9M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +44% since the first grant, against +26% for the ones you funded once.

42 repeat relationships — 33 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$47M

$1.7M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%

+26%

Still filing today

57%

65%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $215k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Community ImprovementEducationEmploymentPublic BenefitPhilanthropyHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

UO
UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME DU LAC
4× · 2021–2024 · $7.1M · revenue +2%
CI
CICP INC
8× · 2017–2024 · $1.8M · revenue +95%
IH
INDIANA HEALTH INFORMATION EXCHANGE INC
3× · 2022–2024 · $1.6M · revenue +73%

Funded once

AI
AMATROL INC
one grant, 2017 · $463k
SN
SOUTHERN NEW HAMPSHIRE UNIVERSITY
one grant, 2017 · $320k · revenue -91%
GI
GREATER INDIANAPOLIS CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INC
one grant, 2023 · $101k · revenue -4%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Indiana University Research & Technology

The indiana university research and technology corporation (iurtc) serves indiana university, the state of indiana, and the nation through creation and application of the university developed technologies and services, and the expanded…

Education

Indiana University Foundation

To maximize private philanthropic support for Indiana University

Education

Indiana Biosciences Research Institute Inc

The ibri is an independent life sciences research institute focused on addressing major underserved areas of public health including diabetes, pediatric rare diseases, and alzheimer's disease. the ibri facilitates the growth of the…

Science & Tech

Indiana Chamber of Commerce Foundation Inc

The foundation conducts studies, produces reports, and establishes initiatives to generate solutions to enhance indiana's economic future and quality of life.

Education

West Central Indiana Economic

Economic development, elderly services and transportation planning

Community Improvement

Franklin College of Indiana

Franklin College empowers students through an experiential education, grounded in the liberal arts and sciences, promoting impactful careers and meaningful lives.

Education

Indiana University Health Bloomington Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health

Indiana Sports Corporation

To perform charitable, educational and similar exempt purposes by fostering amateur sports competitions in central indiana.

Recreation & Sports

Enroll Indy Inc

Enroll indy helps families choose schools that meet their children's needs by providing a one-stop enrollment process, school information that is relevant and easy to understand, and data to inform school improvement in indianapolis,…

Education

Independent Colleges of Indiana Inc

Further independent higher education. ici operates as the collective voice for excellence and choice in higher education for all students. see continuation on attachment 1.

Education

Northeast Indiana Innovation Center

We are a comprehensive entrepreneurial center whose mission is putting business growth, innovation and entrepreneurship to work for northeast indiana

Community Improvement

Indiana University Health North Hospital Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Indiana Health Information Exchange Inc and the most unlike its peers is White's Residential & Family Services Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 26 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/83

the rest of the field

11%

206,164/1,819,482

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

52 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

51/52

Grantees still filing

42/52

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$29,230,453Education$7,793,384Employment$3,941,523Social Science$2,983,211Community Improvement$2,305,516Health$1,593,767Science & Tech$1,068,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Indianapolis Foundation IncIN34.7× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Indianapolis Foundation Inc · Central Indiana Community Foundation Inc · University of Indianapolis · Lilly Endowment Inc · Lumina Foundation for Education Inc · Regional Opportunity Initiatives Inc · Richard M Fairbanks Foundation Inc · Hamilton County Community Foundation Inc · University of Notre Dame du Lac · Project Lead the Way Inc · Strada Education Foundation Inc · Jobs for the Future Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation CICP FOUNDATION INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: REGIONAL OPPORTUNITY INITIATIVES INC.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

high risk

~1 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 7 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

7 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 54.7× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 474832157 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on REGIONAL OPPORTUNITY INITIATIVES INC, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 1 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue grew over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 67% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Cicp Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Cicp Foundation Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

CICP FOUNDATION INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

52 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Cicp Foundation Inc?

More from the funding graph

CICP FOUNDATION INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

52 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Cicp Foundation Inc?

More from the funding graph