Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

Cicp Foundation Inc

Cicp foundation, inc.

$7.4M
Granted FY2024still arriving
40
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$2.3M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Health$15MScience & Tech$12MEmployment$5.7MYouth Development$5.4MEducation$4.0MSocial Science$3.0MCommunity Improvement$1.4MFood & Nutrition$1.0MOther$0
02FY2024 · 40 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k20 grants · $311k
  • $50k–250k12 grants · $1.2M
  • $250k+5 grants · $5.8M
$25,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$27M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PURDUE UNIVERSITY$2,285,000
INDIANA HEALTH INFORMATION EXCHANGE INC$1,307,060
INDIANAPOLIS PRIVATE INDUSTRY COUNCIL INC DBA EMPLOYINDY$1,066,818
CENTRAL INDIANA CORPORATE PARTNERSHIP INC$829,694
RESEARCH TRIANGLE INSTITUTE INC$352,250
THE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION$200,000
UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME DU LAC$145,333
PATTERN INC$135,000
CAREERWISE COLORADO$118,365
THE RAND CORPORATION$114,000
CRAWFORDSVILLE COMM SCHOOLS$75,000
ALLIANCE FOR STRATEGIC GROWTH INC DBA EASTERN INDIANA WORKS$75,000
REGION 10 WORKFORCE BOARD INC DBA SOUTHERN INDIANA WORKS$75,000
SOUTHERN INDIANA EDUCATION CENTER INC$75,000
INDIANA UNIVERSITY$54,450
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $58k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 66% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%WHITE'S RESIDENTIAL & FAMILY SERVICES INC: $16k → 12%STARTEDUP FOUNDATION INC: $10k → 5%STARTEDUP FOUNDATION INC: $10k → 5%EARLY LEARNING INDIANA INC: $22k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NH
IL
MI
IN
CA
CO
VA
NC
DC
AL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 26% of Cicp Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 50% of the giving stays in IN; read by stated purpose it is 78% — more of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Cicp Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$40M · 41 repeat orgs$1.9M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +22% since the first grant, against +17% for the ones you funded once.

41 repeat relationships — 32 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

41
34

Total granted

$40M
$1.7M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+17%

Still filing today

59%
65%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $215k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Community ImprovementEmploymentEducationPublic BenefitSocial SciencePhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IP
    Indianapolis Private Industry Council
    5× · 2020–2024 · $3.3M · revenue +71%
  • TB
    THE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION
    6× · 2019–2024 · $2.0M · revenue +11%
  • CI
    CENTRAL INDIANA CORPORATE PARTNERSHIP INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.8M · revenue +95%

Funded once

  • AI
    AMATROL INC
    one grant, 2017 · $463k
  • GU
    GuideStar USA Inc
    one grant, 2017 · $320k · revenue -91%
  • GI
    Greater Indianapolis Chamber of Commerce Inc
    one grant, 2023 · $101k · revenue +13%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Enroll Indy Inc

Enroll indy helps families choose schools that meet their children's needs by providing a one-stop enrollment process, school information that is relevant and easy to understand, and data to inform school improvement in indianapolis,…

Education
2
Indiana Innovation Council Inc

Promote and educate indiana residents on the state's economic success and positive gains.

—
3
Indiana University Alumni Association Inc

The indiana university alumni association activates and supports the global alumni network- encouraging alumni to grow a lifelong connection with indiana university, and inspiring their ongoing generosity toward each other and the…

—
4
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
5
Independent Insurance Agents of Indiana

To enhance the competitive position and fulfill business requirements of independent agents and brokers, advocating buyer interest, and continually striving to be the premier trade association.

—
6
Northeast Indiana Innovation Center Inc

We are a comprehensive entrepreneurial center whose mission is putting business growth, innovation and entrepreneurship to work for northeast indiana

Community Improvement
7
Independent Colleges of Indiana Inc

The Independent Colleges of Indiana (ICI) advances and strengthens the competitive standing of its 29 member independent, nonprofit, regionally accredited, degree granting colleges and universities. ICI works to ensure opportunity, access,…

Education
8
Indiana Veteran Initiative Inc

Partnering with veterans, their families, indiana employers, and communities to facilitate a meaningful transition to civilian life while strengthening indiana's economy.

Public Benefit
9
Indiana University Health Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
10
Indianapolis Downtown Marketing Inc

Indianapolis Downtown Marketing, Inc. (IDMI) exists to improve downtown Indianapolis. IDMI focuses on marketing downtown businesses, destinations, organizations, activities and events.

—
11
Indiana Institute of Technology Inc

Indiana tech is a private, independent, and non-denominational university. students are prepared for active participation in the complex, global society of the 21st century and are motivated toward a life of significance and worth. about…

Education
12
Indiana University Health Foundation Inc

Indiana university health foundation leverages the power of philanthropy to support the iu health goal of making indiana one of the healthiest states in the nation.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Indiana Economic Development Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Mentors of Color. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 26 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%8%<5yr14%8%5–10yr19%21%10–20yr16%19%20–35yr13%8%35–55yr16%37%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%2%5–10yr19%38%10–20yr16%13%20–35yr13%33%35–55yr16%15%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
1%1/83
the rest of the field
13%
240,395/1,819,482

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

53 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 53 of the 83 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
52/53
Grantees still filing
34/53
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Indiana University School of Medicine — $12,938,018 · OtherIndiana University School of MedicineTRUSTEES OF PURDUE UNIVERSITY — $10,742,167 · OtherTRUSTEES OF PURDUE UNIVERSITYSTATE OF INDIANA — $1,750,000 · OtherSTATE OF INDIANA+49 more — $3,800,268 · Other+49 moreUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac — $7,058,333 · EducationUniversity of Notr…CAREERWISE COLORADO — $501,942 · EducationCAREERWISE COLORAD…+6 more — $233,109 · EducationIndianapolis Private Industry Council — $3,333,978 · EmploymentIndianapo…Institute for Workforce Excellence Inc — $339,500 · EmploymentInstitute…+5 more — $268,045 · Employment+5 moreTHE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION — $1,970,000 · Social ScienceNATIONAL OPINION RESEARCH CENTER — $648,211 · Social ScienceAMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH — $365,000 · Social ScienceCENTRAL INDIANA CORPORATE PARTNERSHIP INC — $1,824,356 · Community ImprovementElevate Ventures Inc — $165,000 · Community ImprovementPattern Inc — $135,000 · Community Improvement+6 more — $181,160 · Community ImprovementINDIANA HEALTH INFORMATION EXCHANGE INC — $1,588,767 · Health+1 more — $5,000 · HealthNINETWELVE INSTITUTE INC — $623,000 · Science & TechResearch Triangle Institute — $445,000 · Science & Tech
Other$29,230,453Education$7,793,384Employment$3,941,523Social Science$2,983,211Community Improvement$2,305,516Health$1,593,767Science & Tech$1,068,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac — $7,058,333 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetIndianapolis Private Industry Council — $3,333,978 over 5y, 4.1% of budgetTHE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION — $1,970,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetCENTRAL INDIANA CORPORATE PARTNERSHIP INC — $1,824,356 over 8y, 7.3% of budgetINDIANA HEALTH INFORMATION EXCHANGE INC — $1,588,767 over 3y, 6.4% of budgetNATIONAL OPINION RESEARCH CENTER — $648,211 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNINETWELVE INSTITUTE INC — $623,000 over 2y, 3.7% of budgetCAREERWISE COLORADO — $501,942 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetResearch Triangle Institute — $445,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Rand Corporation — $393,291 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH — $365,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetInstitute for Workforce Excellence Inc — $339,500 over 2y, 10% of budgetGuideStar USA Inc — $320,078 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetNational FFA Foundation Inc — $300,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetElevate Ventures Inc — $165,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetMetropolitan Indianapolis Public Media Inc — $160,400 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetPattern Inc — $135,000 over 1y, 9.8% of budgetREGIONAL OPPORTUNITY INITIATIVES INC — $107,500 over 2y, 67% of budgetGreater Indianapolis Chamber of Commerce Inc — $101,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetREGION 10 WORKFORCE BOARD INC — $100,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetALLIANCE FOR STRATEGIC GROWTH INC — $100,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetINDY HUB FOUNDATION INC — $85,000 over 2y, 25% of budgetNATIONAL HOT ROD ASSOCIATION — $76,800 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPurdue Research Foundation — $68,354 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetIVY TECH FOUNDATION INC — $58,725 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHAMILTON COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $57,500 over 1y, 8.3% of budgetEVSC FOUNDATION INC — $57,500 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetNORTHERN INDIANA WORKFORCE BOARD INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSOUTHEAST INDIANA WORKFORCE INVESTMENT BOARD — $50,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetButler University — $48,030 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLeadership Indianapolis Inc — $46,200 over 2y, 5.3% of budgetCROSSING NATIONAL INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE CENTER OF WORKFORCE INNOVATIONS INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEARLY LEARNING INDIANA INC — $22,012 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMENTORS OF COLOR — $21,040 over 2y, 14% of budgetSTARTEDUP FOUNDATION INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetUniversity of Indianapolis — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGreater Indianapolis Chamber of Commerce Foundation Inc — $20,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetWHITE'S RESIDENTIAL & FAMILY SERVICES INC — $16,442 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSAGAMORE INSTITUTE INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF STATE DEPARTMENTS OF AGRICULTURE — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNOBLE EDUCATIONAL INITIATIVES INC — $13,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetTEENWORKS INC — $12,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetIndianapolis Zoological Society Inc — $12,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE INDY HUB INC — $10,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetIndiana Chamber of Commerce Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGOVERNOR BOB ORR INDIANA ENTREPRENEURIAL FELLOWSHIP INC — $9,375 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetPACK AWAY HUNGER INC — $7,250 over 1y, 1.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lilly Endowment IncUniversity of Indiana…The Indianapolis Foun…Central Indiana Commu…Richard M Fairbanks F…Regional Opportunity …Lumina Foundation for…Project Lead the Way …Hamilton County Commu…Community Foundation …Institute for Citizen…Nicholas H Noyes Jr M…
Lilly Endowment IncIN41.9× affinity23 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lilly Endowment Inc · University of Indianapolis · The Indianapolis Foundation Inc · Central Indiana Community Foundation Inc · Richard M Fairbanks Foundation Inc · Regional Opportunity Initiatives Inc · Lumina Foundation for Education Inc · Project Lead the Way Inc · Hamilton County Community Foundation Inc · Community Foundation Alliance Inc · Institute for Citizens and Scholars · Nicholas H Noyes Jr Memorial Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Cicp Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 83 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines