· Public charity
Christus Health Central Louisiana
The corporation is organized and shall be operated exclusively for charitable, scientific, educational and religious purposes of advancing, promoting and supporting the health care ministries of the sponsoring congregations which operate and are controlled in conformity with the ethical and moral teachings of the roman catholic church,…
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 9 grants below total $593,135 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $7,430,242 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $6,837,107 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k3 grants · $45k
- $50k–250k6 grants · $549k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Ctr LA Community Fdn | $150,000 |
| Northwestern St Univ | $97,200 |
| Northwestern St Univ Fdn | $90,000 |
| Manna House | $80,975 |
| ST FRANCES CAB HSL FND ALEX | $80,454 |
| LA St Univ at Alexandria | $50,000 |
| Natchitoches Rg Medical Ctr Fdn | $20,500 |
| Ctr LA Homeless Coalition | $14,006 |
| CENLA Pregnancy Ctr Inc | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–19, $368k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
23 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $81k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- OCOCHSNER CLINIC FOUNDATION7× · 2018–2024 · $36M · revenue +78%
- LCLOUISIANA CLINICAL SERVICES INC4× · 2017–2023 · $4.6M · revenue +301%
- CLCENTRAL LOUISIANA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION2× · 2024–2025 · $300k · revenue +239%
Funded once
- TGTHE GENERAL HEALTH FOUNDATIONone grant, 2020 · $8.1M
- LFLOUISIANA FAMILY SERVICES INCgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $368k · revenue +59%
- CMCHRISTUS-TRINITY MOTHER FRANCES FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $55k · revenue +68%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The primary purpose of christus foundation shreveport-bossier is to promote philanthropy and charitable giving to provide resources to enhance the ability of christus health northern louisiana in its mission of extending the healing…
The society's exempt purpose is to extend medical knowledge, advance medical science, elevate the standards of medical education and training, enforce just medical laws and regulations, promote dialogue and cooperation among physicians and…
No board approved mission statement
The foundation serves as the philanthropic arm of lake charles memorial hospital, working to support and enhance the hospital's mission of providing compassionate care, community service and cutting-edge technology for the people of…
To improve opportunities for cancer research in Louisiana and enhance educational efforts regarding prevention and control over cancer.
The mission of the association is to promote rural health as a distinct concern in louisiana; to serve as a forum for a unified voice for healthcare providers, public officials, healthcare workers, educators, and consumers working to…
The sole mission of the foundation is to support, enhance and assist the lsu health sciences center at shreveport in its many endeavors.
The mission is to protect, promote, and foster the welfare of louisiana state university and to create and nurture mutually beneficial relationships between the university and its alumni and friends. the association, using the talents and…
The corporation is organized and shall be operated exclusively for charitable, scientific, educational and religious purposes of advancing, promoting and supporting the health care ministries of the sponsoring congregations which operate…
Inspired by the vision of st. francis and in the tradition of the roman catholic church, we extend the healing ministry of jesus christ to god's people, especially those most in need. we call forth all who serve in this healthcare…
The corporation is organized and shall be operated exclusively for the charitable, scientific, and educational purposes of advancing, promoting, and supporting the health care ministries of those religious congregations (the "sponsoring…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Central Louisiana Inc and the most unlike its peers is The General Health Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 43 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 18% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds OCHSNER CLINIC FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LOUISIANA CLINICAL SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds METAIRIE PHYSICIANS SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds NATCHITOCHES CLINICAL SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds LOUISIANA FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL LOUISIANA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds St Frances Cabrini Hospital Foundation OF ALEXANDRIA ↗
- Who funds Louisiana State University at Alexandria Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds NSU FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORK ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL LOUISIANA INC ↗
- Who funds NATCHITOCHES REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CHRISTUS-TRINITY MOTHER FRANCES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LOUISIANA TROOPERS CHARITIES INC ↗
- Who funds LOUISIANA CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL LOUISIANA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL LOUISIANA COALITION TO PREVENT HOMELESSNESS INC ↗
- Who funds CENLA PREGNANCY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds LOUISIANA HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds Central Louisiana Chamber of Commerce ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Christus Health Northern Louisiana · Christus Health Southwestern Louisiana · Christus Health · Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Louisiana Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Christus Health Central Louisiana funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.