· Public charity
Christus Health Northern Louisiana
The corporation's mission shall be to "extend the healing ministry of jesus christ, consistent therewith, shall operate according to the doctrines, resolutions.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 8 grants below total $464,336 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $3,235,389 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $2,771,053 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k1 grant · $7k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $62k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $395k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CHRISTUS Fdn Shreveport-Bossier | $193,076 |
| Northwestern State Univ | $137,000 |
| Louisiana Tech Univ | $65,000 |
| Northwestern State Univ Fdn Inc | $30,000 |
| Bossier Chamber Of Commerce | $12,260 |
| Shreveport - Bossier Sports Commission | $10,000 |
| LSU Hlth Sciences Fdn Shrvprt | $10,000 |
| Bossier Parish School Board | $7,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–22, $48k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 84% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +36% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
24 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 20 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 64% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $166k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- OCOCHSNER CLINIC FOUNDATION6× · 2018–2023 · $14M · revenue +78%
- CFChristus Foundation Shreveport-Bossier4× · 2022–2025 · $1.5M · revenue +83% · 39% of their budget
- LCLOUISIANA CLINICAL SERVICES INC4× · 2017–2023 · $1.4M · revenue +301%
Funded once
- TGTHE GENERAL HEALTH FOUNDATIONone grant, 2020 · $2.1M
- CMCHRISTUS-TRINITY MOTHER FRANCES FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $55k · revenue +68%
- MLMARTIN LUTHER KING HEALTH CENTER DBA MLK HEALTH CENTER & PHARMACYone grant, 2018 · $44k · revenue +7%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
No board approved mission statement
All functions of the foundation are dedicated to supporting lsu health sciences center at shreveport.
The society's exempt purpose is to extend medical knowledge, advance medical science, elevate the standards of medical education and training, enforce just medical laws and regulations, promote dialogue and cooperation among physicians and…
No board approved mission statement
The patient-centered healthcare team of the lsu healthcare network will provide the highest quality, comprehensive medical care with compassion and professionalism, while maintaining our commitment to academic excellence
The primary purpose of the foundation is to engage in and carry out scientific research in the fields of medical science, medical economics, public health, sociology, and related areas for the benefit of the interested public, medical…
The mission is to protect, promote, and foster the welfare of louisiana state university and to create and nurture mutually beneficial relationships between the university and its alumni and friends. the association, using the talents and…
Inspired by the vision of st. francis and in the tradition of the roman catholic church, we extend the healing ministry of jesus christ to god's people, especially those most in need. we call forth all who serve in this healthcare…
Health care foundation of north mississippi is operated exclusively for the purpose of raising, receiving, and administering funds (for medical, scientific, educational and charitable purposes), to assist hospital and non-profit…
The foundation serves as the philanthropic arm of lake charles memorial hospital, working to support and enhance the hospital's mission of providing compassionate care, community service and cutting-edge technology for the people of…
The lafayette general foundation was created to support lafayette general health (lgh), acadiana's only community-owned, nonprofit health system. we exist to help fulfill lgh's mission, to restore, maintain, and improve health. our role is…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lsu in Shreveport Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is The General Health Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds OCHSNER CLINIC FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Christus Foundation Shreveport-Bossier ↗
- Who funds LOUISIANA CLINICAL SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds LSU IN SHREVEPORT FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds METAIRIE PHYSICIANS SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds NSU FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds David Raines Community Health Center Inc ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds BOSSIER PARISH COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Northwestern University ↗
- Who funds NATCHITOCHES CLINICAL SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds CHRISTUS-TRINITY MOTHER FRANCES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MARTIN LUTHER KING HEALTH CENTER DBA MLK HEALTH CENTER & PHARMACY ↗
- Who funds NORTH LOUISIANA ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds LOUISIANA FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds LOUISIANA TROOPERS CHARITIES INC ↗
- Who funds LSU HEALTH FOUNDATION NEW ORLEANS ↗
- Who funds LSU HEALTH SCIENCES FOUNDATION IN SHREVEPORT ↗
- Who funds BOSSIER CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
- Who funds HOPE CONNECTIONS INC ↗
- Who funds MULTI-CULTURAL DEVELOPMENT CENTER ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST LOUISIANA FOOD BANK ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Christus Health Central Louisiana · Community Foundation of North Louisiana · Christus Health Southwestern Louisiana · American Electric Power Foundation · Willis-Knighton Medical Center · Grayson Foundation Inc · United Way of Northwest Louisiana · Carolyn W & Charles T Beaird Family Foundation · Christus Health · Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Louisiana Foundation · Biomedical Research Foundation of Northwest Louisiana · Enterprise Holdings Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Christus Health Northern Louisiana funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.