Skip to content

· Private foundation

Christopher & Constance Li Charitable Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$360k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$153k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$1.8MEducation$706kInternational$137kHealth$25kHuman Services$10k
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $2k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $37k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $321k
$67,900
Median grant
4
States reached
$6.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CROSSPOINT CHURCH OF SILICON VALLEY$153,000
STANFORD UNIVERSITY$100,000
CHINA GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THEOLOGY INC (US)$67,900
THE DM STEARNS MISSIONARY FUND INC$25,000
NEW HEART MUSIC MINISTRIES$12,000
LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO$1,800
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–19, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THE ALLIANCE: $10k → 9%AGAPE LOVE DEAF INTERNATIONAL: $12k → 8%AGAPE LOVE DEAF INTERNATIONAL: $3k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
IN
PA
NJ
CA
UT
CO
MD
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.6M · 10 repeat orgs$393k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
14

Total granted

$1.6M
$391k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+43%

Still filing today

50%
14%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHuman ServicesReligionPhilanthropyEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CG
    CHINA GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THEOLOGY INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $715k · revenue +34%
  • NH
    NEW HEART MUSIC MINISTRIES
    9× · 2017–2025 · $96k · revenue +17%
  • SL
    SILVER LINING MISSIONS
    2× · 2023–2024 · $35k · revenue +41%

Funded once

  • CS
    CROSSPOINT SAN LEANDRO CHURCH LLC
    one grant, 2024 · $300k
  • SI
    SEND INTERNATIONAL INC
    one grant, 2018 · $20k
  • CC
    CAMPUS CRUSAGE FOR CHRIST
    one grant, 2019 · $12k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fudan University Education Development Foundation

1) Support academic research and talents cultivation in Fudan University. 2) Promote higher education in Fudan University and other educational organizations in China. 3) Strengthen global cooperations of education and research. 4) Enhance…

Education
2
Long Island University

To provide excellence and access in private higher education to those who seek to expand their knowledge and prepare themselves for meaningful, educated lives and for service to their communities and the world.

—
3
Logos Evangelical Seminary

Logos Evangelical Seminary equips servant-leaders in the four core areas of spiritual formation, academic excellence, ministerial competence and godly living; to serve Christ's Church and to proclaim the gospel to the world effectively.

Education
4
Gallaudet University

Organization's mission gallaudet university, federally chartered in 1864, is a bilingual, diverse, multicultural institution of higher education that ensures the intellectual and professional advancement of deaf and hard of hearing…

Education
5
Dominican University of California

Our institutional mission is to educate and prepare students to be ethical leaders and socially responsible global citizens who incorporate the dominican values of study, reflection, community and service into their lives.

Education
6
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
7
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
8
Shanghai Jiao Tong University Foundation of America (Sjtufa)
Education
9
Lincoln University

To provide traditional educational programs in diverse fields of study, delivered by experienced educators, and leading to outstanding employment opportunities for American and international students

—
10
Institute of Chinese Studies

ChinsSource is a trusted partner and platform for educating the global church on critical issues facing the church and ministries in China and for connecting Christians inside and outside China to advance the kingdom of God globally

International
11
Chinese Christian Scholars Association in North America

To share Gospel with Chinese intellectuals. The goals of the Association are 1. to network and discipline Chinese Christian scholars in North America for their moral and academic excellence, 2. to reach the unreached Chinese academic world…

Religion
12
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Love Foundation Us Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHINA GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THEOLOGY INC: $715,400 · OtherCHINA GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THEOLOGY INCCROSSPOINT CHURCH OF SILICON VALLEY: $403,500 · OtherCROSSPOINT CHURCH OF SILICON VALLEYCROSSPOINT SAN LEANDRO CHURCH LLC: $300,000 · OtherCROSSPOINT SAN LEANDRO CHURCH LLCCHINESE BIBLE CHURCH OF MARYLAND: $123,000 · OtherCHINESE BIBLE CHURCH OF MARYLANDD M STEARNS MISSIONARY FUND: $75,000 · Other+13 more: $127,904 · Other+13 moreTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $700,000 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE …+1 more: $1,800 · EducationNEW HEART MUSIC MINISTRIES: $96,000 · ReligionLOVE FOUNDATION US INC: $65,000 · International+1 more: $2,000 · InternationalSILVER LINING MISSIONS: $35,000 · PhilanthropyAgape Love Deaf International Inc: $15,000 · Human ServicesALLIANCE: $10,000 · Human Services
Other$1,744,804Education$701,800Religion$96,000International$67,000Philanthropy$35,000Human Services$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHINA GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THEOLOGY INC: $715,400 over 9y, 7.7% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $700,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNEW HEART MUSIC MINISTRIES: $96,000 over 9y, 1.8% of budgetLOVE FOUNDATION US INC: $65,000 over 2y, 5.3% of budgetSILVER LINING MISSIONS: $35,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetAgape Love Deaf International Inc: $15,000 over 2y, 9.1% of budgetALLIANCE: $10,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHINA GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THEOLOGY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds NEW HEART MUSIC MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds LOVE FOUNDATION US INC ↗
  • Who funds SILVER LINING MISSIONS ↗
  • Who funds Agape Love Deaf International Inc ↗
  • Who funds ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds LOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Blackbaud Giving FundSC9.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Blackbaud Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Christopher & Constance Li Charitable Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Christopher & Constance Li Charitable Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Christopher & Constance Li Charitable Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Christopher & Constance Li Charitable Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Christopher & Constance Li’s filings →

    More from the funding graph