Skip to content

· Private foundation

Christmas Valley Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$275k
Granted FY2024still arriving
42
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What it funds
0184% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Animals$167kHuman Services$162kEducation$129kYouth Development$125kHealth$119kReligion$111kArts & Culture$92kInternational$48kOther$0
02FY2024 · 42 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k31 grants · $96k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $179k
$5,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$35,000
ST LOUIS ZOO ASSOCIATION$30,000
ST LOUIS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$20,000
Individual grant recipient$17,000
HOMEOWNERS FOUNDATION INC$15,000
DUO DOGS$11,000
Individual grant recipient$10,500
Individual grant recipient$10,000
CHARITABLE DISTRIBUTIONS$10,000
AMERICAN ENTERPRISE INST$10,000
MANNA FOOD BANK$10,000
ST LOUIS CATHOLIC ACADEMY$8,000
ST MARTINS EPISCOPAL CHURCH$6,000
THE COMMUNITY HOUSE$5,500
BALLET 314$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 78% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THE WOMENS SAFE HOUSE: $500 → 14%THE COMMUNITY HOUSE: $6k → 7%UNITED FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN: $5k → 14%UNITED FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN: $3k → 14%AMIGA: $5k → 11%HELPING HAND ME DOWNS: $1k → 11%CIRCLE OF CONCERN: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
NH
IL
WI
NY
MA
IA
OH
PA
NJ
CA
CO
MO
WV
VA
MD
TN
NC
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 61 repeat orgs$282k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +52% since the first grant, against +9% for those funded once.

61 repeat relationships: 29 still active in FY2024, 32 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

61
95

Total granted

$1.2M
$242k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+52%
+9%

Still filing today

46%
28%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $40k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEducationHealthHuman ServicesAnimalsReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TS
    THE SAINT LOUIS ZOO ASSOCIATION
    6× · 2019–2024 · $144k · revenue +146%
  • YL
    YOUNG LIFE
    5× · 2017–2023 · $125k · revenue +59%
  • DD
    DUO DOGS INC
    6× · 2017–2024 · $62k · revenue +92%

Funded once

  • TB
    THE BACKSTOPPERS INC FKA POLICEMEN & FIREMEN FUND OF ST LOUIS
    one grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue +9%
  • LC
    LA COUNTY MUSEUM OF ART
    one grant, 2022 · $14k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Food Bank for Central & Northeast Missouri

The food bank for central & northeast missouri is a regional disaster and hunger relief network that acquires and distributes millions of meals each year to help neighbors get the food they need to thrive. (continued on schedule o)the…

Food & Nutrition
2
St Louis Community Foundation

To promote the possibilities of charitable giving, helping charitable citizens understand how they can effectively provide for the community they love and the causes they care deeply about.

Philanthropy
3
St Martin Hospital Inc

To improve, maintain and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
4
St Marys Healthcare System for Children Inc

To serve as the sole member of the various health care and supporting organizations that comprise st. mary's healthcare system for children

Health
5
University Hospital & Clinics Inc

The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
6
Uchicago Medicine Network Inc

Uchicago medicine network, inc. supports and encourages health and human service by providing support, directly or indirectly to ingalls memorial hospital, the university of chicago medical center, and other related tax-exempt…

Health
7
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
8
Mission St Louis

Mission: st. louis empowers individuals for social and economic growth through relationships and opportunity.

Community Improvement
9
The Humane Society for Seattleking County

Seattle humane promotes the human-animal bond by saving and serving pets in need, regardless of age, ability, circumstance or geography.

Animals
10
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
11
Good Samaritan Foundation

Partnering for healing and a healthy future through philanthropy.

—
12
Columbia College

Columbia college improves lives by providing quality education to both traditional and nontraditional students, helping them achieve their true potential.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Missouri Botanical Garden Board of Trustees; the most unlike its peers is Lalma Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

62 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 62 of the 169 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
62/62
Grantees still filing
40/62
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $92,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientDUO DOGS INC: $62,000 · OtherDUO DOGS INCST LOUIS CATHOLIC ACADEMY: $58,210 · OtherST LOUIS CATHOLIC ACADEMYIndividual grant recipient: $51,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $48,000 · OtherST PATRICKS CENTER: $45,000 · OtherST MARTINS EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $41,500 · Other+133 more: $540,132 · Other+133 moreTHE SAINT LOUIS ZOO ASSOCIATION: $143,600 · AnimalsTHE SAINT LO…Nevis Animal Speak: $12,500 · AnimalsNevis Animal…+3 more: $6,250 · AnimalsYOUNG LIFE: $125,000 · Youth DevelopmentYOUNG LIF…The Ranken-Jordan Home For Convalescent Crippled Children: $41,000 · HealthST LOUIS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $24,500 · HealthDelta Gamma Center for Children with Vis: $5,000 · HealthALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC: $5,000 · HealthMUSIC HEALTH ALLIANCE INC: $4,000 · Health+1 more: $1,000 · HealthBALLET 314: $18,500 · Arts & CultureMISSOURI HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $17,650 · Arts & CultureMUNICIPAL THEATRE ASSOCIATION OF ST LOUIS: $14,156 · Arts & CultureFOLK ALLIANCE INTERNATIONAL: $10,000 · Arts & CultureCIRCUS FLORA INC: $2,500 · Arts & Culture+3 more: $2,000 · Arts & CultureCARVER PROJECT: $15,000 · EducationFRENCH BROAD RIVER ACADEMY INC: $13,000 · EducationOXFEST CHARITIES INC: $5,000 · EducationGARDENEERS: $2,000 · Education+3 more: $2,250 · EducationMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $27,000 · InternationalHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC: $5,000 · International
Other$938,342Animals$162,350Youth Development$125,000Health$80,500Arts & Culture$64,806Education$37,250International$32,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE SAINT LOUIS ZOO ASSOCIATION: $143,600 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $125,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDUO DOGS INC: $62,000 over 6y, 1.7% of budgetThe Ranken-Jordan Home For Convalescent Crippled Children: $41,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $27,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetST LOUIS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $24,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BACKSTOPPERS INC FKA POLICEMEN & FIREMEN FUND OF ST LOUIS: $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBALLET 314: $18,500 over 4y, 7.1% of budgetMANNA FOOD BANK INC: $18,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMISSOURI HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $17,650 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCARVER PROJECT: $15,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetMUNICIPAL THEATRE ASSOCIATION OF ST LOUIS: $14,156 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFRENCH BROAD RIVER ACADEMY INC: $13,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNevis Animal Speak: $12,500 over 3y, 3.3% of budgetFOLK ALLIANCE INTERNATIONAL: $10,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN: $7,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetST PATRICK CENTER: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetROARING FORK CONSERVANCY: $5,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY HOUSE: $5,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDelta Gamma Center for Children with Vis: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetASHEVILLE CITY SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCHICAGO'S GREEN CITY MARKET PROGRAM: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOXFEST CHARITIES INC: $5,000 over 1y, 6.4% of budgetHCS FAMILY SERVICES: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCIRCLE OF CONCERN: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAMIGA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 6.7% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHINSDALE HUMANE SOCIETY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAGAPE HELP HOUSE OF PACIFIC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetST LOUIS CARDINALS COMMUNITY FUND: $4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMUSIC HEALTH ALLIANCE INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetST LOUIS PSYCHOANALYTIC INSTITUTE: $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetST LOUIS AREA FOOD BANK INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCIRCUS FLORA INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGARDENEERS: $2,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetLALMA INC: $1,500 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetForest Park Forever Inc: $1,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST ANDREWS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCARDINAL GLENNON CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBABY2BABY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetURBAN GROWERS COLLECTIVE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHELPING HAND ME DOWNS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE SAINT LOUIS ZOO ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
  • Who funds DUO DOGS INC ↗
  • Who funds The Ranken-Jordan Home For Convalescent Crippled Children ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds ST LOUIS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE BACKSTOPPERS INC FKA POLICEMEN & FIREMEN FUND OF ST LOUIS ↗
  • Who funds BALLET 314 ↗
  • Who funds MANNA FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds MISSOURI HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH ↗
  • Who funds CARVER PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds MUNICIPAL THEATRE ASSOCIATION OF ST LOUIS ↗
  • Who funds FRENCH BROAD RIVER ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds Nevis Animal Speak ↗
  • Who funds FOLK ALLIANCE INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

World Wide Technology FoundationMO27.2× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: World Wide Technology Foundation · St Louis Community Foundation Inc · St Louis Community Foundation · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · Employees Community Fund of the Boeing Company · St Louis Service Bureau Foundation · Jordan Mary R & Ettie a Charitable · Pott Foundation · Edward Jones Foundation · Centene Foundation · Edward Jones Foundation · Fischer-Bauer-Knirps Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Christmas Valley Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Christmas Valley Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
16report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 169 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Christmas Valley’s filings →

More from the funding graph