· Private foundation
Christine C Schulze Legacy Foundation co Ken Ashworth & Associates
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 48% of Christine C Schulze Legacy Foundation co Ken Ashworth & Associates’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k2 grants · $10k
- $10k–50k25 grants · $440k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| St Jude's Ranch for Children | $30,000 |
| Share Village Las Vegas | $30,000 |
| SAFE House | $25,000 |
| Valley View Community Cares | $20,000 |
| Family Promise | $20,000 |
| Nevada Partnership for Homeless You | $20,000 |
| Chef Jeff Project | $20,000 |
| Hopelink of Southern Nevada | $20,000 |
| Hen - Hen Dogcatchers Foundation | $20,000 |
| Angels of Las Vegas | $20,000 |
| Village of Hope - Whitney Elementar | $20,000 |
| Nevada Veterans Foundation | $20,000 |
| Shadetree Shelter | $20,000 |
| Project 150 | $20,000 |
| Help of So Nevada - West Homeless Y | $15,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $573k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +52% since the first grant, against -30% for the ones you funded once.
23 repeat relationships — 21 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $55k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SJST JUDES RANCH FOR CHILDREN INC4× · 2021–2024 · $125k · revenue +166%
- SHSAFE HOUSE INC4× · 2021–2024 · $105k · revenue +26%
- P1PROJECT 1504× · 2021–2024 · $85k · revenue +16%
Funded once
- VVVeterans Village Las Vegasone grant, 2021 · $35k
- SWShannon West Homeless Youth Ctrone grant, 2021 · $20k
- CICREDOLV INCone grant, 2021 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Safe nest's mission is to provide comprehensive, collaborative, and innovative services for everyone affected by domestic and sexual violence while passionatley working to end this shared epidemic.
New vista is committed to providing people of all ages with intellectual and developmental disabilities, equitable opportunities, and supported living arrangements so that they may experience life to the fullest.
The shade tree, inc. (organization), a nevada nonprofit corporation, provides temporary shelter for homeless and abused women and children in crisis and offers life-changing services promoting stability, dignity, and self reliance. the…
Through feeding the hungry, support, and care, we provide redemption, recovery, and re-entry to the homeless, addicted, and those in need.
Our mission is to provide supportive services, safe and sanitary emergency shelters, and to facilitate a continuum of care that helps end the cycle of homelessness in the panhandle area.
Our non-profit organization is dedicated to fostering inclusivity, joy, and empowerment within the developmentally disabled adult community through our annual prom event. Our mission is to provide a memorable and inclusive prom experience,…
We assist young mothers with housing and wrap around services.
Habitat for humanity las vegas, inc. (habitat) a not-for-profit organization located in las vegas, nevada was established in 1990. habitat's purpose is to build low cost houses with the help of the homeowner families, which are transferred…
R.A.D.s mission is to make a positive impact in the lives of children with autism and their families in the Las Vegas area every day.
Covenant house is dedicated to serving all of god's children with absolute respect and unconditional love to help youth experiencing homelessness and to protect and safeguard all youth in need.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hopelink of Southern Nevada and the most unlike its peers is St Judes Ranch for Children Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ST JUDES RANCH FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds SAFE HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds PROJECT 150 ↗
- Who funds VALLEY VIEW COMMUNITY CARES ↗
- Who funds HOPELINK OF SOUTHERN NEVADA ↗
- Who funds THE CHEF JEFF PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds Angels of Las Vegas ↗
- Who funds NEVADA PARTNERSHIP FOR HOMELESS YOUTH ↗
- Who funds NEVADA VETERANS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds OPPORTUNITY VILLAGE ↗
- Who funds STREET TEENS ↗
- Who funds BABY'S BOUNTY ↗
- Who funds PROGRESSIVE CHOICES ↗
- Who funds Nathan Adelson Hospice Inc ↗
- Who funds MIRACLE LEAGUE OF LAS VEGAS ↗
- Who funds LUCKY FIN PROJECT ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Mgm Resorts Foundation · Canarelli Family Foundation · NV Energy Charitable Foundation · Engelstad Family Foundation · United Way of Southern Nevada · Three Square · Speedway Children's Charities · The Mel & Ruth Wolzinger Foundation · Vegas Golden Knights Foundation Inc · Nevada Community Foundation Inc · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Christine C Schulze Legacy Foundation co Ken Ashworth & Associates funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Christine C Schulze Legacy Foundation co Ken Ashworth & Associates?
Find your warmest path to Christine C Schulze Legacy Foundation co Ken Ashworth & Associates through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.