Skip to content

· Private foundation

Christian V and Lisa D Young Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$590k
Granted FY2024still arriving
37
Grants FY2024still arriving
15
States reached
$61k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Environment$1.0MAnimals$678kCommunity Improvement$542kHealth$180kPublic Safety & Disaster$159kArts & Culture$140kFood & Nutrition$136kRecreation & Sports$130kOther$0
02FY2024 · 37 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k16 grants · $76k
  • $10k–50k20 grants · $454k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $61k
$11,000
Median grant
15
States reached
$7.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PROJECT ACCESS INC$60,543
WORLD WILDLIFE FUND$45,000
OCEAN CONSERVANCY$45,000
Individual grant recipient$42,000
CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL$30,000
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN$30,000
HUMANE WORLD FOR ANIMALS$30,000
THE NATURE CONSERVANCY$27,500
WILDLIFE CONSERVATION NETWORK$25,000
THE CONSERVATION FUND$21,000
CHOPRA FOUNDATION$20,000
DIAN FOSSEY GORILLA FUND INTERNATIONAL$18,000
TONY FINAU FOUNDATION$17,500
FEEDING AMERICA$16,000
WHALE & DOLPHIN CONSERVATION$16,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $90k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 41% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%SHANTI CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $3k → 12%SHOES THAT FIT: $1k → 14%SHANTI CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $3k → 12%SHANTI CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $3k → 12%COVENANT HOUSE: $3k → 17%SHANTI CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $4k → 12%SHANTI CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $3k → 12%SHANTI CHILDRENS FOUNDATION: $600 → 12%UTAH PET PARTNERS: $13k → 8%COVENANT HOUSE: $500 → 17%UTAH PET PARTNERS: $12k → 8%NATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE: $15k → 17%THERAPY ANIMALS OF UTAH: $10k → 8%THERAPY ANIMALS OF UTAH: $8k → 8%THERAPY ANIMALS OF UTAH: $5k → 8%COVENANT HOUSE: $1k → 17%UTAH PET PARTNERS: $5k → 8%COVENANT HOUSE: $500 → 17%YOUTH MAKING A DIFFERENCE: $500 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ID
MN
IL
NY
MA
OH
CA
UT
CO
MO
VA
MD
AZ
KS
TN
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.9M · 59 repeat orgs$407k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +46% since the first grant, against +36% for those funded once.

59 repeat relationships: 24 still active in FY2024, 35 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

59
54

Total granted

$2.9M
$274k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
+36%

Still filing today

56%
39%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $134k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
AnimalsEnvironmentHuman ServicesHealthRecreation & SportsInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PA
    Project Access Inc
    8× · 2017–2024 · $345k · revenue +186%
  • HW
    Humane World for Animals Inc
    6× · 2019–2024 · $242k · revenue +31%
  • WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $219k · revenue +62%

Funded once

  • SA
    SCHOLARSHIP AMERICA
    one grant, 2018 · $20k
  • US
    Utah Sports Commission Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $18k · revenue +386%
  • PA
    PROJECT ACCESS (GALA SPONSORSHIP)
    one grant, 2020 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
2
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
3
Animal Wellness Action

To prevent cruelty to animals, we promote enacting and enforcing good public policies. enacting good laws depends upon electing good lawmakers, and we remind voters which candidates care about and support animal issues.

Human Services
4
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
5
American Humane Association

Founded in 1877, american humane association, dba american humane society (american humane) is committed to ensuring the safety, welfare and well-being of animals. our leadership programs are first to serve in promoting and nurturing the…

Animals
6
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
7
Healthy Environment Alliance of Utah

Heal utah's mission is to protect utah's environment and its people by promoting clean air, clean energy, and comprehensive solutions to radioactive and toxic waste.

Environment
8
Denver Zoological Foundation

Inspiring communities to save wildlife for future generations.

Animals
9
Global Animal Partnership
Animals
10
Humane World for Animals International

HUMANE WORLD FOR ANIMALS INTERNATIONAL, FKA HUMANE SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL (HSI), works around the globe to promote the human-animal bond, rescue and protect dogs and cats, improve farm animal welfare, protect wildlife, promote animal-free…

Animals
11
The Humane League

We exist to end the abuse of animals raised for food. this mission is executed by persuading companies and institutions to adopt animal welfare policies through negotiation and pressure campaigns, and then holding them accountable to their…

Animals
12
Utah Zoological Society

Utah's hogle zoo creates champions for wildlife and is our community's gateway to animals, connecting our visitors with the natural world and engaging them in wildlife conservation action locally and worldwide.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Utah Clean Energy Alliance Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Danna Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

65 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 65 of the 127 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
63/65
Grantees still filing
49/65
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $139,500 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCYMAYO CLINIC: $75,000 · OtherMAYO CLINICUTAH FOOD BANK: $62,250 · OtherALPHA PROJECT FOR THE HOMELESS: $60,000 · OtherCOMPANIONS ANIMAL CENTER: $58,000 · OtherDian Fossey Gorilla Fund International Inc: $58,000 · OtherVOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA: $54,375 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF UTAH: $54,250 · Other+82 more: $834,491 · Other+82 moreWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $219,250 · EnvironmentWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INCOCEAN CONSERVANCY: $207,500 · EnvironmentOCEAN CONSERVANCYCONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION: $144,000 · EnvironmentCONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL…UTAH CLEAN ENERGY ALLIANCE INC: $82,500 · EnvironmentUTAH CLEAN ENERGY ALLIANCE…THE CONSERVATION FUND A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $77,000 · EnvironmentTHE CONSERVATION FUND A NO…WHALE AND DOLPHIN CONSERVATIONINC: $72,000 · EnvironmentWHALE AND DOLPHIN CONSERVA…+1 more: $15,000 · EnvironmentProject Access Inc: $344,995 · Community ImprovementProject Access IncTONY FINAU FOUNDATION FKA FINAU YOUTH FOUNDATION: $210,000 · Community ImprovementTONY FINAU FOUNDAT…WASATCH COMMUNITY GARDENS: $24,500 · Community ImprovementHumane World for Animals Inc: $241,500 · AnimalsHumane World…WILDLIFE CONSERVATION NETWORK INC: $66,000 · AnimalsWILDLIFE CON…THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $25,000 · AnimalsTHE AMERICAN…Mission K9 Rescue Inc: $22,500 · AnimalsMission K9 R…+7 more: $23,400 · Animals+7 moreWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $105,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $32,500 · InternationalDIRECT RELIEF: $5,000 · International+1 more: $500 · InternationalUTAH PET PARTNERS: $52,750 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $19,500 · Human ServicesSHANTI CHILDRENS FOUNDATION: $16,500 · Human ServicesNATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE INC: $15,000 · Human ServicesCOVENANT HOUSE: $4,500 · Human Services+2 more: $1,500 · Human ServicesNATIONAL ABILITY CENTER: $40,000 · Recreation & SportsUtah Sports Commission Foundation: $18,000 · Recreation & SportsSTAKE CLUB CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INCORPORATED: $11,050 · Recreation & Sports+2 more: $1,500 · Recreation & Sports
Other$1,395,866Environment$817,250Community Improvement$579,495Animals$378,400International$143,000Human Services$109,750Recreation & Sports$70,550

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetProject Access Inc: $344,995 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetHumane World for Animals Inc: $241,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $219,250 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTONY FINAU FOUNDATION FKA FINAU YOUTH FOUNDATION: $210,000 over 4y, 15% of budgetOCEAN CONSERVANCY: $207,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION: $144,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $139,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $105,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUTAH CLEAN ENERGY ALLIANCE INC: $82,500 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetTHE CONSERVATION FUND A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $77,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetWHALE AND DOLPHIN CONSERVATIONINC: $72,000 over 6y, 2.5% of budgetWILDLIFE CONSERVATION NETWORK INC: $66,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUTAH FOOD BANK: $62,250 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetALPHA PROJECT FOR THE HOMELESS: $60,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetDian Fossey Gorilla Fund International Inc: $58,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetUTAH PET PARTNERS: $52,750 over 6y, 15% of budgetIDAHO CONSERVATION LEAGUE INC: $40,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetMONARCH SCHOOL PROJECT: $40,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetNATIONAL ABILITY CENTER: $40,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetFeeding America: $37,750 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $32,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetUTAH SYMPHONY & OPERA: $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $25,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWASATCH COMMUNITY GARDENS: $24,500 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetMission K9 Rescue Inc: $22,500 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetTHE DANNA FOUNDATION: $20,210 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $19,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUtah Sports Commission Foundation: $18,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $17,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSHANTI CHILDRENS FOUNDATION: $16,500 over 6y, 2.1% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROD DEDEAUX FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetSTAKE CLUB CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INCORPORATED: $11,050 over 1y, 22% of budgetST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE: $11,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIMAGE REBORN INC: $10,000 over 2y, 4.4% of budgetWORLEY FIRE FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetRonald McDonald House Charities of the Intermountain Area Inc: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWarrior Dog Foundation: $7,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetArizona Humane Society: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFEED MY HUNGRY CHILDREN: $5,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHWEST WILDLIFE CONSERVATION CENTER: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF UTAH: $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE: $4,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWasatch Public Media: $4,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetIndependent Arts & Media: $3,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLost Our Home Pet Foundation: $3,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Project Access Inc ↗
  • Who funds Humane World for Animals Inc ↗
  • Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds TONY FINAU FOUNDATION FKA FINAU YOUTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds OCEAN CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds UTAH CLEAN ENERGY ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CONSERVATION FUND A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds WHALE AND DOLPHIN CONSERVATIONINC ↗
  • Who funds WILDLIFE CONSERVATION NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds UTAH FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds ALPHA PROJECT FOR THE HOMELESS ↗
  • Who funds Dian Fossey Gorilla Fund International Inc ↗
  • Who funds UTAH PET PARTNERS ↗
  • Who funds IDAHO CONSERVATION LEAGUE INC ↗
  • Who funds MONARCH SCHOOL PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL ABILITY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Feeding America ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds UTAH SYMPHONY & OPERA ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds WASATCH COMMUNITY GARDENS ↗
  • Who funds Mission K9 Rescue Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE DANNA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Chopra Foundation ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sorenson Legacy FoundationUT19.3× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sorenson Legacy Foundation · Lawrence & Janet Dee Foundation · George S and Dolores Dore Eccles Foundation · The Community Foundation of Utah · David Kelby Johnson Memorial Foundation · Larry H Miller and Gail Miller Family Foundation · Jeffrey S & Helen H Cardon Foundation · The Ray and Tye Noorda Foundation · Willard L Eccles Charitable Foundation · McCarthey Family Foundation · The Kahlert Foundation Inc · Ihc Health Services Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Christian V and Lisa D Young Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Christian V and Lisa D Young Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • Whale and Dolphin Conservationinc: 3% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
15report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Christian V and Lisa D Young Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Christian V and Lisa D Young Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 127 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Christian V and Lisa D Young Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph