Skip to content
Christian Community Credit Union at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Christian Community Credit Union

The mission of CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY CREDIT UNION is to serve christ followers to live and give more abundantly.

$268k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$696kInternational$332kHuman Services$208kEducation$188kHealth$48kPublic Benefit$34kCivil Rights$26k
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 6 grants below total $212,443, the rows itemized in this filing. The $268,246 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $55,803 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $9k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $56k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $148k
$21,201
Median grant
5
States reached
$839M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHRISTIAN ALLIANCE FOR ORPHANS$74,600
MISSION AVIATION FELLOWSHIP$73,142
INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES$21,201
ASPIRE NETWORKS (FORMELY TRANSFORMATION MINISTRIES)$20,000
SAMARITAN'S PURSE$15,000
HIDDEN MANNA CORPORATION DBA CALVARY CHAPEL GOLDEN SPRINGS$8,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $197k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CHRISTIAN ALLIANCE FOR ORPHANS: $90k → 6%CHRISTIAN ALLIANCE FOR ORPHANS: $75k → 6%CHRISTIAN ALLIANCE FOR ORPHANS: $33k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ID
IL
PA
CA
VA
NC
DC
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.5M · 10 repeat orgs$77k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
7

Total granted

$1.5M
$68k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+15%
+28%

Still filing today

60%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationReligionHuman ServicesInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BU
    BIOLA UNIVERSITY INC
    4× · 2017–2022 · $53k · revenue +15%
  • SM
    SAMARITAN MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL
    2× · 2017–2021 · $51k · revenue +87%
  • SP
    SAMARITAN'S PURSE
    3× · 2021–2024 · $30k · revenue +83%

Funded once

  • OC
    OLIVE CRESTgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $11k · revenue +72%
  • HO
    HEALTH OUTREACH TO THE MIDDLE EAST FOR CHRIST
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue -21%
  • SL
    SAND LAKE BAPTIST CHURCHgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +74%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
North America Bible Institute

North America Bible Institute (NABI) is an evangelical graduate school, made up of students who are diverse in both ethnicity and ministry aims -- but united in great love for Jesus and his gospel. As a graduate school, NABI offers them…

Education
2
Explore God Network
—
3
More International Ministries

To spread the gospel of jesus christ through crusades

Religion
4
Christian Apologetics and Research Ministry Inc

To glorify god by equipping the church with proper christian doctrine and to help non-believers come to a saving knowledge of jesus christ.

—
5
Free to Worship Ministries

This church will be that place of emergency where people can come any time of day or night. We will be a place that will lead people back to health both spiritually and naturally.

Religion
6
Mission Partners for Christ Aka Community Health Initiatives
Community Improvement
7
Redeemed Christian Church of God

To strengthen marriages and families, to encourage Christian fellowship as we evangelize the lost around us and minister to the needy with the resources God has blessed us.

Religion
8
Heart Bridge International

Heart Bridge International exists to equip and empower Christians around the world to fulfill the Great Commission. The organization provides free ministry training, discipleship resources, and practical coaching to under-resourced…

Religion
9
Asia Us Impact

Religious

Religion
10
Olivet University

Providing guality Christian education to the network generation

Education
11
Global Faith Network
Human Services
12
Jubal Band Ministries

Jubal band ministries mission is to invite people to become disciples of christian life with jesus.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Olive Crest; the most unlike its peers is Calvary Global Network. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
6/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MISSION AVIATION FELLOWSHIP: $537,321 · OtherMISSION AVIATION FELLOWSHIPAMERICAN BAPTIST FOREIGN MISSION SOCIETY: $199,543 · OtherAMERICAN BAPTIST FOREIGN MISSION SOCIETYTRANSFORMATION MINISTRIES: $112,866 · OtherTRANSFORMATION MINISTRIESInstitute for Global Engagement: $80,000 · OtherInstitute for Global EngagementOPERATION MOBILIZATION: $59,283 · OtherOPERATION MOBILIZATION+4 more: $38,500 · OtherChristian Alliance for Orphans: $197,150 · Human ServicesChristian Alli…Council for Christian Colleges and Universities: $135,000 · EducationCouncil for C…BIOLA UNIVERSITY INC: $53,148 · EducationBIOLA UNIVERS…SAMARITAN MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL: $50,600 · HealthOLIVE CREST: $11,150 · HealthRebirth Homes Inc: $10,000 · HealthSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $30,054 · ReligionCALVARY GLOBAL NETWORK: $7,030 · ReligionHEALTH OUTREACH TO THE MIDDLE EAST FOR CHRIST: $10,000 · International
Other$1,027,513Human Services$197,150Education$188,148Health$71,750Religion$37,084International$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetChristian Alliance for Orphans: $197,150 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetCouncil for Christian Colleges and Universities: $135,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetInstitute for Global Engagement: $80,000 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetBIOLA UNIVERSITY INC: $53,148 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL: $50,600 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $30,054 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOLIVE CREST: $11,150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEALTH OUTREACH TO THE MIDDLE EAST FOR CHRIST: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetRebirth Homes Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetCALVARY GLOBAL NETWORK: $7,030 over 1y, 1.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Christian Alliance for Orphans ↗
  • Who funds Council for Christian Colleges and Universities ↗
  • Who funds Institute for Global Engagement ↗
  • Who funds BIOLA UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds OLIVE CREST ↗
  • Who funds HEALTH OUTREACH TO THE MIDDLE EAST FOR CHRIST ↗
  • Who funds SAND LAKE BAPTIST CHURCH ↗
  • Who funds Rebirth Homes Inc ↗
  • Who funds CALVARY GLOBAL NETWORK ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Baptist Foun…Natl Christian Charit…American Endowment Fo…Vanguard Charitable E…Network for GoodDonor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
American Baptist FoundationPA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Baptist Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Christian Community Credit Union funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Christian Community Credit Union. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Christian Community Credit Union’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home