Skip to content

· Private foundation

Chris Mikesell Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$44k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Environment$113kEducation$65kInternational$55kRecreation & Sports$44kArts & Culture$27kHuman Services$15kHealth$6kPublic Safety & Disaster$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$4,500
Median grant
4
States reached
$892k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WESTERN STATE COLORADO UNIV FOUNDATION$7,000
Individual grant recipient$6,000
UNICEF USA$5,000
CRESTED BUTTE LAND TRUST$5,000
Community Foundation of Gunnison Va$5,000
Paradise Place Preschool$4,500
Crested Butte Avalanche Center Inc$3,000
Black Canyon High School$3,000
High Country Conservation Advocates$2,000
The Keewaydin Foundation$1,000
KANSAS ALLIANCE FOR WETLANDS AND STREAMS$1,000
Freedom Hooves Therapeutic Riding C$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $17k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 53% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%American Red Cross: $1k → 14%The dZi Foundation: $2k → 7%Paradox Sports: $1k → 12%GREATER WICHITA YMCA: $2k → 16%The dZi Foundation: $2k → 7%Paradox Sports: $500 → 12%GREATER WICHITA YMCA: $2k → 16%The dZi Foundation: $2k → 7%Paradox Sports: $500 → 12%GREATER WICHITA YMCA: $2k → 16%dZi Foundation: $1k → 7%dZi Foundation: $1k → 7%dZi Foundation: $1k → 7%The dZi Foundation: $500 → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 8% of Chris Mikesell Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 25% of the giving stays in KS; by stated purpose, 22%.

Chris Mikesell Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$280k · 18 repeat orgs$29k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +76% since the first grant, against +23% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
7

Total granted

$280k
$22k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+76%
+23%

Still filing today

67%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEnvironmentRecreation & SportsInternationalHealthFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WESTERN COLORADO UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $60k · revenue +177%
  • CB
    CRESTED BUTTE LAND TRUST
    9× · 2017–2025 · $42k · revenue +193%
  • UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF
    8× · 2017–2025 · $39k · revenue +76%

Funded once

  • UC
    UNICEF - CHILD PROTECTION EBOLA
    one grant, 2023 · $6k
  • UF
    UNICEF-Multi-Country Famine Fund
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • UC
    UNICEF-Syrian Crisis Fund
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rocky Mountain Wild

Rocky mountain wild works to protect, connect, and restore wildlife and wild lands in the southern rocky mountain region. we work to secure the biodiversity of the mountains, plains, and desert ecosystems of colorado, wyoming, utah, and…

Environment
2
Colorado Water Trust

To restore water to colorado's rivers.

Environment
3
Wyoming Outdoor Council

The wyoming outdoor council's mission is to protect wyoming's environment and quality of life now and for future generations.

Environment
4
Colorado Headwaters Land Trust

To conserve and steward the open lands and natural character of the headwaters of the colorado river in partnership with the local community.

—
5
Western Conservation Foundation

Building leaders to protect the west's land, air, and water.

Environment
6
Mesa County Land Conservancy Inc

To protect and enhance agricultural land, wildlife habitat and scenic lands in western colorado to benefit the community at large, enrich lives, and provide opportunities for outdoor recreation for future generations.

Environment
7
Aspen Valley Land Trust

Protecting the open land and special places of the roaring fork and middle colorado river valleys for wildlife, agriculture, and community forever.

Environment
8
Montana Wildlife Federation

The montana wildlife federation is a statewide conservation organization dedicated to protecting wildlife, wildlife habitat, and public access for outdoor recreation.

Animals
9
Wyoming Wildlife Federation

Wyoming wildlife federation delivers leadership in conservation for the state's wildlife, hunters, anglers, and conservationists through policy, education, advocacy, and habitat.

Animals
10
Wildearth Guardians

Wildearth guardians works to protect and restore the wildlife, wild places, wild rivers, and health of the american west.

Unclassified
11
Greater Yellowstone Coalition

Greater yellowstone coalition works with all people to protect the lands, waters, and wildlife of the greater yellowstone ecosystem, now and for future generations.

Environment
12
Kansas Land Trust Inc

To protect and preserve lands of natural, ecological, scenic, historic, agricultural, or recreational significance in kansas.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Foundation of the Gunnison Valley; the most unlike its peers is Montrose Childrens Museum. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
14/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WESTERN COLORADO UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $60,000 · OtherWESTERN COLORADO UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $22,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientDyck Arboretum of the Plains: $17,500 · OtherDyck Arboretum of the PlainsCrested Butte Avalanche Center Inc: $16,250 · OtherCrested Butte Avalanche Center IncLegacy Regional Community Foundatio: $11,500 · OtherLegacy Regional Community Foundatio+13 more: $53,400 · Other+13 moreCRESTED BUTTE LAND TRUST: $42,000 · EnvironmentCRESTED BUTTE L…KANSAS ALLIANCE FOR WETLANDS AND STREAMS INC: $5,000 · EnvironmentKANSAS ALLIANCE…UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $39,000 · InternationalUNITED STATE…COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE GUNNISON VALLEY: $27,000 · PhilanthropyCRESTED BUTTE NORDIC COUNCIL: $12,600 · Recreation & SportsTHE KEEWAYDIN FOUNDATION: $9,000 · Recreation & SportsDZI FOUNDATION: $8,000 · Human ServicesTHE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF WICHITA KANSAS (2311): $6,000 · Human ServicesPARADOX SPORTS: $2,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $1,000 · Human ServicesMONTROSE CHILDRENS MUSEUM: $8,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$181,150Environment$47,000International$39,000Philanthropy$27,000Recreation & Sports$21,600Human Services$17,000Arts & Culture$8,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWESTERN COLORADO UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $60,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetCRESTED BUTTE LAND TRUST: $42,000 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $39,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE GUNNISON VALLEY: $27,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetCRESTED BUTTE NORDIC COUNCIL: $12,600 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetTHE KEEWAYDIN FOUNDATION: $9,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetDZI FOUNDATION: $8,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetMONTROSE CHILDRENS MUSEUM: $8,000 over 2y, 9.7% of budgetHIGH COUNTRY CONSERVATION ADVOCATES: $6,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetTHE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF WICHITA KANSAS (2311): $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetKANSAS ALLIANCE FOR WETLANDS AND STREAMS INC: $5,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CLEARWATER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetFREEDOM HOOVES THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER INC: $5,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetKANSAS FOODBANK WAREHOUSE INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARADOX SPORTS: $2,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLUE SKY RANCH INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WESTERN COLORADO UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CRESTED BUTTE LAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE GUNNISON VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds CRESTED BUTTE NORDIC COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds THE KEEWAYDIN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DZI FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MONTROSE CHILDRENS MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds HIGH COUNTRY CONSERVATION ADVOCATES ↗
  • Who funds THE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF WICHITA KANSAS (2311) ↗
  • Who funds KANSAS ALLIANCE FOR WETLANDS AND STREAMS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CLEARWATER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FREEDOM HOOVES THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds KANSAS FOODBANK WAREHOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds PARADOX SPORTS ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds BLUE SKY RANCH INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Colorado Gives FoundationCO18.3× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · Dea Family Foundation · Community Foundation of the Gunnison Valley · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · National Philanthropic Trust · Network for Good · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Chris Mikesell Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Chris Mikesell Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Chris Mikesell Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Chris Mikesell Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Chris Mikesell’s filings →

    More from the funding graph