Skip to content

Texas · Nonprofit

Migrant Workers Action

Migrant Workers Action (Texas) receives grants from 5 organizations whose IRS filings report $70,959 to it, the largest being PAYPAL CHARITABLE GIVING FUND ($30,975). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$520k
Funders on record
5
Grants received
$71k
Net assets
$77k
1/5 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 10%
01What it does

What Migrant Workers Action does

Mission

Migrant Workers Action advocates for the rights of migrant domestic workers facing abuses under the Kafala system.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Provide support to migrant domestic workers experiencing exploitation or abuse including individual case management legal assistance referrals to essential services and temporary accommodation.

    $223,931 spentof which $73,835 as grants
    49% of program spending
  2. Support to migrant domestic workers through community organizing rights awareness and training initiatives that build collective power and resilience.

    $95,190 spent
    21% of program spending
  3. Advocates for policy and legal reforms to improve the rights protection and freedom of movement of migrant domestic workers in Lebanon and across migration corridors.

    $84,053 spent
    18% of program spending
  4. Facilitate safe and dignified return for migrant domestic workers wishing to go back to their home countries in coordination with relevant partners.

    $27,626 spent
    6% of program spending
  5. Track progress and impact across all programmes to ensure accountability inform strategic decisions and strengthen organizational learning

    $17,198 spent
    4% of program spending
  6. Provide emergency cash assistance to migrant domestic workers in crisis to help meet immediate needs and support safe recovery or transition.

    $5,173 spentof which $5,173 as grants
    1% of program spending
  7. Conduct qualitative and policy research to document rights violations analyze migration systems and inform evidence-based advocacy for structural change.

    $4,025 spent
    1% of program spending
  8. Support returned workers through reintegration planning psychosocial assistance and follow-up to promote long-term stability and wellbeing.

    $0 spent
    0% of program spending

The 8 programs described on its FY2025 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $457,196.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2019, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2019, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20192019 Revenue 100 ($37k) Expenses 100 ($10k) Net assets 100 ($27k)2020 Revenue 1180 ($441k) Expenses 2186 ($219k) Net assets 910 ($249k)2021 Revenue 787 ($294k) Expenses 3243 ($325k) Net assets 795 ($217k)2022 Revenue 892 ($333k) Expenses 3615 ($363k) Net assets 687 ($188k)2023 Revenue 878 ($328k) Expenses 4054 ($407k) Net assets 397 ($109k)2024 Revenue 1225 ($458k) Expenses 4166 ($418k) Net assets 542 ($148k)2025 Revenue 1391 ($520k) Expenses 5885 ($591k) Net assets 283 ($77k)
2019202020212022202320242025
Revenue (1391)Expenses (5885)Net assets (283)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2019 to 2020, from $34k to $292k (+754%).

$34k
$292k
$248k
$220k
$233k
$373k
$557k
2019202020212022202320242025
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2019 0% · 2020 0% · 2021 37% · 2022 82% · 2023 51% · 2024 5% · 2025 5%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

98% of Migrant Workers Action’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (100% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 4,945 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 7 reported years ran a deficit.

$27k
’19
$221k
’20
−$31k
’21
−$30k
’22
−$79k
’23
$40k
’24
−$71k
’25
9.1
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Board chair

Khairunissa Dhala

President of the Board

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

2019202020212022202320242025
Listed3333432
Joined·+0+0+0+2+0·
No longer listed·00011·
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2020 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 3 funders, grant income rose $31k → $34k.

2 of 5 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 44% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of Migrant Workers Action’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

Migrant Workers Action leans on a few funders — its largest provides 44% of grant income and the top three 91%; half comes from just 2 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left

100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund Migrant Workers Action.

44%
largest funder
91%
top three
~3
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2020 100% · 2021 100% · 2022 100% · 2023 63% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

Migrant Workers Action draws 100% of its grant income from funders outside Texas, across 3 states in all.

NY
CA
DC

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $31k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

Migrant Workers Action has grown faster than three-quarters of the 2,468 international nonprofits its size.

Operating margin−14% · bottom quartile
Months of reserve9.1mo · above the median
Revenue growth (annualized)55% · top quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 2,468 international nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025

Organizations like Migrant Workers Action

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Texas

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

77% of spending goes to programs.

Program 77%Management 17%Fundraising 6%

Governance

3
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

99%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

TX

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for Migrant Workers Action: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds Migrant Workers Action?
Migrant Workers Action (Texas) receives grants from 5 organizations whose IRS filings report $70,959 to it, the largest being PAYPAL CHARITABLE GIVING FUND ($30,975). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does Migrant Workers Action have?
IRS filings report 5 organizations giving $70,959 in grants to Migrant Workers Action, 1 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of Migrant Workers Action?
PAYPAL CHARITABLE GIVING FUND is the largest funder on record, with $30,975 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like Migrant Workers Action find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Texas. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2019–2025), and the filings of 5 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing