Skip to content

Washington, D.C. · Nonprofit

INSTITUTE FOR STATE EFFECTIVENESS

INSTITUTE FOR STATE EFFECTIVENESS (Washington, D.C.) receives grants from 12 organizations whose IRS filings report $5,083,178 to it, the largest being ROCKEFELLER BROTHERS FUND INC ($1,528,000). 6 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$1.7M
Funders on record
12
Grants received
$5.1M
Net assets
$2.0M
6/12 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 24%
01What it does

What Institute for State Effectiveness does

Mission

The Institute for State Effectiveness seeks to close the governance gap and advance inclusive growth so that states and markets deliver to citizens. Ise advances practical approaches to strengthen capacity for transformation, through building core systems and accountability for results across levels of government.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Country analysis and engagement - ise works through its country stocktaking program to understand country context. In particular countries, ise works with country partners to understand country context and to design and support implementation of policies and programs on regional and local levels to fit that context. Ise's approach relies on understanding systems across government functions, promoting growth and opportunity through fostering inclusive markets, and enhancing citizen inclusion and empowerment by expanding the space for civil society. Ise teams also provide advisory support in key instruments including country-wide programs particularly in support of inclusive, large-scale community-driven development programs; and in thematic areas, including education and training; public finance; and social policy and participatory development. This work supports leaders and managers with the know-how to address the governance gap and build governance systems that are responsive to the needs of citizens.

    $1,189,004 spent$625,745 earned by the program
    78% of program spending
  2. Insight and analysis - ise's analysis is informed by years of studying and working with civic actors, public sector and firms on governance and market building across a wide range of contexts. Ise conducts research and provides input on policy through several programs and research areas including:- "state of the state" dialogue and research to identify gains, lessons learned and emerging trends relating to the social compact and public trust in institutions.- democracy & government: state, market, citizenship - this work focuses onstrengthening democratic governance, rule of law and inclusive market building. Ise works to refine concepts and frameworks for governance, promote economic and civic engagement, and strengthen international relationships. Ise also develops tools and frameworks for building integrated markets and identifying assets to support inclusive growth and development; and - successful transitions to map pathways from poverty to prosperity and from autocracy to democracy in the developing world over the course of the past century to extract relevant lessons for today's challenges. This allows for comparison across time and context.-global order & international…

    $267,679 spent
    18% of program spending
  3. Leadership development programs - ise's engage, educate, and train programs advance approaches to equip new generation leaders and managers with the knowledge, skills, and tools to create inclusive policies and accountable and effective institutions. The program consists of a variety of education and training initiatives, including: I) tailored leadership programs and retreats for senior leaders and managers across private, public, and civil society sectors in countries and regions navigating processes of transformation and reform; ii) managing governance reform and transformation courses to equip professionals with tools and skills to accelerate institutional reforms and better serve citizens; iii) ise's nextgen fellows program to enhance practical skills and substantive expertise for the next generation of global leaders, while establishing connections for them across focus areas and regions; and iv) specialized trainings that enhance the practical skills and substantive knowledge of leaders and managers on sector specific functions of governance.

    $41,704 spent
    3% of program spending
  4. Networks partnership and dissemination - ise organizes and participates in events on governance and development in order to create networks and partnerships across fields relevant to ise's work and creates products to disseminate ideas and develop thinking on governance issues. Audiences include, but are not limited to, government, business, and civil society, as well as the general public.

    $20,480 spent
    1% of program spending

The 4 programs described on its FY2025 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $1,518,867.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($3.7M) Expenses 100 ($3.1M) Net assets 100 ($1.4M)2018 Revenue 109 ($4.1M) Expenses 125 ($3.8M) Net assets 120 ($1.6M)2019 Revenue 138 ($5.2M) Expenses 178 ($5.4M) Net assets 99 ($1.3M)2020 Revenue 107 ($4.0M) Expenses 116 ($3.6M) Net assets 131 ($1.8M)2021 Revenue 102 ($3.8M) Expenses 123 ($3.8M) Net assets 135 ($1.8M)2022 Revenue 102 ($3.8M) Expenses 115 ($3.5M) Net assets 158 ($2.1M)2023 Revenue 61 ($2.3M) Expenses 82 ($2.5M) Net assets 139 ($1.9M)2024 Revenue 55 ($2.1M) Expenses 59 ($1.8M) Net assets 159 ($2.1M)2025 Revenue 46 ($1.7M) Expenses 62 ($1.9M) Net assets 147 ($2.0M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (46)Expenses (62)Net assets (147)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2019 to 2020, from $2.7M to $4.5M (+69%).

$2.1M
$3.2M
$2.7M
$4.5M
$4.4M
$3.4M
$2.2M
$2.4M
$2.3M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 72% · 2018 68% · 2019 63% · 2020 71% · 2021 77% · 2022 73% · 2023 41% · 2024 2% · 2025 18%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

61% of INSTITUTE FOR STATE EFFECTIVENESS’s revenue is contributions — more earned-revenue than three-quarters of its peers (97% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 1,680 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$681k
’17
$264k
’18
−$276k
’19
$435k
’20
$47k
’21
$307k
’22
−$248k
’23
$267k
’24
−$160k
’25
13
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Clare Lockhart

Director/CEO/president

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed554677755
Joined·+1+0+2+2+0+2+0+0
No longer listed·11010220
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 3 funders, grant income rose $176k → $483k.

1 of 12 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 1% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of INSTITUTE FOR STATE EFFECTIVENESS’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

INSTITUTE FOR STATE EFFECTIVENESS has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 30% of grant income, and it takes 3 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 3 funders to its left

30%
largest funder
61%
top three
~6
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2018 100% · 2019 100% · 2020 47% · 2021 52% · 2022 46% · 2023 48% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

60% of INSTITUTE FOR STATE EFFECTIVENESS's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 50% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

INSTITUTE FOR STATE EFFECTIVENESS draws 93% of its grant income from funders outside Washington, D.C., across 5 states in all.

ME
NY
CA
NC
DC

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Washington, D.C. out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $50k arriving through sponsors registered in 1 state is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

INSTITUTE FOR STATE EFFECTIVENESS holds deeper cash reserves than three-quarters of the 798 international nonprofits its size.

Operating margin−9% · bottom quartile
Months of reserve12.7mo · top quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)−9% · bottom quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 798 international nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2025

Government funding INSTITUTE FOR STATE EFFECTIVENESS receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $607k on record.

Federal$607k
grants $607kcontracts $0
22
24
Top agencies
  • Department of State$607k

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like INSTITUTE FOR STATE EFFECTIVENESS

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Washington, D.C.

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

80% of spending goes to programs.

Program 80%Management 15%Fundraising 5%

Governance

3
board members
67%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention–Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

81%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for INSTITUTE FOR STATE EFFECTIVENESS: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds INSTITUTE FOR STATE EFFECTIVENESS?
INSTITUTE FOR STATE EFFECTIVENESS (Washington, D.C.) receives grants from 12 organizations whose IRS filings report $5,083,178 to it, the largest being ROCKEFELLER BROTHERS FUND INC ($1,528,000). 6 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does INSTITUTE FOR STATE EFFECTIVENESS have?
IRS filings report 12 organizations giving $5,083,178 in grants to INSTITUTE FOR STATE EFFECTIVENESS, 6 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of INSTITUTE FOR STATE EFFECTIVENESS?
ROCKEFELLER BROTHERS FUND INC is the largest funder on record, with $1,528,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like INSTITUTE FOR STATE EFFECTIVENESS find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Washington, D.C.. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Institute for State Effectiveness →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 12 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 22, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing