Skip to content

· Private foundation

Chipotle Cultivate Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$401k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$190k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Community Improvement$470kEducation$435kFood & Nutrition$52kPhilanthropy$50kEnvironment$15kArts & Culture$10kRecreation & Sports$5k
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $70k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $321k
$30,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$801k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UC DAVIS FOUNDATION$189,935
OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$130,754
NIMAN RANCH NEXT GENERATION FOUNDATION$30,000
GIVINGA FOUNDATION INC$30,000
ECOCENTER INC$10,000
CULINARY INSTITUTE OF AMERICA$5,000
RANDALLS ISLAND PARK ALLIANCE INC$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 91% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%GIVINGA FOUNDATION INC: $30k → 7%ECOCENTER INC: $10k → 10%UC DAVIS FOUNDATION: $190k → 16%CULINARY INSTITUTE OF AMERICA: $20k → 9%NATIONAL YOUNG FARMERS COALITION: $3k → 11%SOUL FIRE FARM INSTITUTE INC: $10k → 11%MENTOR BKB FOUNDATION: $24k → 17%CITY HARVEST INC: $5k → 20%INSTITUTE OF AMERICAN INDIAN ARTS FOUNDATION: $10k → 12%NIMAN RANCH NEXT GENERATION FOUNDATION: $30k → 10%UNCHARTED: $246k → 12%OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $131k → 15%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $5k → 7%GIVINGA FOUNDATION INC: $20k → 7%CULINARY INSTITUTE OF AMERICA: $5k → 9%SOUL FIRE FARM INSTITUTE INC: $10k → 11%RANDALLS ISLAND PARK ALLIANCE INC: $5k → 17%NIMAN RANCH NEXT GENERATION FOUNDATION: $30k → 10%UNCHARTED: $224k → 12%NIMAN RANCH NEXT GENERATION FOUNDATION: $30k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

62%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$605k · 4 repeat orgs$378k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +18% since the first grant, against +8% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
4

Total granted

$605k
$42k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+8%

Still filing today

75%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 9% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $336k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationFood & NutritionEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • U
    UNCHARTED
    2× · 2019–2021 · $470k · revenue -89%
  • NR
    NIMAN RANCH NEXT GENERATION FOUNDATION
    3× · 2022–2024 · $90k · revenue +37%
  • CULINARY INSTITUTE OF AMERICA
    2× · 2019–2024 · $25k · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • MB
    MENTOR BKB FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $24k
  • IO
    INSTITUTE OF AMERICAN INDIAN ARTS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue -64%
  • CITY HARVEST INC
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +8%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Us Farming and Ranching Foundation

MISSION: bring all of American agriculture together, with farmers and ranchers at the center, to collectively identify and tackle critical, long-term issues. We collaborate, communicate, educate, advocate and utilize science to advance the…

Food & Nutrition
2
Foundation for Food and Agriculture Research

Foundation for food and agriculture research connects funders, researchers and farmers through public-private partnerships to support audacious research addressing the biggest food and agriculture challenges.

Food & Nutrition
3
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
4
Turner Institute of Ecoagriculture Inc

Institute's mission is to research, develop, practice, and disseminate sustainable strategies and techniques for conserving ecosystems, agriculture, and rural communities. institute will achieve this mission by using its livestock, land,…

Science & Tech
5
National Farmers Union Foundation

The national farmers union foundation's (nfuf) mission is to empower people to educate our youth, neighbors, media and policymakers on the social, economic and cooperative contributions of family agriculture.

Food & Nutrition
6
Climate Foundation

To research and develop healthy climate solutions comprising global food security, ecosystem regeneration and carbon balance in seas and soils.

Science & Tech
7
The Food Alliance

Food alliance works at the juncture of science, business and values to define and promote sustainability in agriculture and the food industry, and to ensure safe and fair working conditions, humane treatment of animals, and careful…

Arts & Culture
8
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
9
Zero Foodprint

Zero foodprint is mobilizing the food world around agricultural climate solutions. our work aims to create a circular economy that incentivizes practices that actively draw down carbon dioxide and offer our best hope of addressing the…

Food & Nutrition
10
Us Farmers and Ranchers Alliance

MISSION: bring all of American agriculture together, with farmers and ranchers at the center, to collectively identify and tackle critical, long-term issues. We collaborate, communicate, educate, advocate and utilize science to advance the…

Community Improvement
11
California Foundation for Agriculture in the Classroom

To increase awareness and understanding of agriculture among california educators and students.

—
12
California Farmland Trust

The mission of the California Farmland Trust is to help farmers protect the best farmland in the world.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Soul Fire Farm Institute Inc; the most unlike its peers is Niman Ranch Next Generation Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
7/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNCHARTED: $469,949 · OtherUNCHARTEDMENTOR BKB FOUNDATION: $24,000 · Other+3 more: $20,000 · OtherTHE UC DAVIS FOUNDATION: $189,935 · EducationTHE UC DAVIS FOUNDATIONOHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $130,754 · EducationOHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONNIMAN RANCH NEXT GENERATION FOUNDATION: $90,000 · EducationNIMAN RANCH NEXT GENERATION FOUNDATIONCULINARY INSTITUTE OF AMERICA: $24,800 · EducationCULINARY INSTITUTE OF AMERICAGIVINGA FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 · PhilanthropySOUL FIRE FARM INSTITUTE INC: $20,000 · Food & NutritionCITY HARVEST INC: $5,000 · Food & NutritionNATIONAL YOUNG FARMERS COALITION INC: $2,997 · Food & NutritionECOCENTER INC: $10,000 · Environment
Other$513,949Education$435,489Philanthropy$50,000Food & Nutrition$27,997Environment$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNCHARTED: $469,949 over 2y, 14% of budgetTHE UC DAVIS FOUNDATION: $189,935 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetOHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $130,754 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNIMAN RANCH NEXT GENERATION FOUNDATION: $90,000 over 3y, 12% of budgetGIVINGA FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCULINARY INSTITUTE OF AMERICA: $24,800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSOUL FIRE FARM INSTITUTE INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetINSTITUTE OF AMERICAN INDIAN ARTS FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetECOCENTER INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCITY HARVEST INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRANDALL'S ISLAND PARK ALLIANCE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL YOUNG FARMERS COALITION INC: $2,997 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Silicon Valley Community FoundationCA14× affinity5 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Chipotle Cultivate Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Chipotle Cultivate Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Chipotle Cultivate Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Chipotle Cultivate Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Chipotle Cultivate’s filings →

    More from the funding graph