· Private foundation
The Pittulloch Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k1 grant · $3k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $105k
- $50k–250k17 grants · $1.9M
- $250k+15 grants · $4.0M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| RESILIENT GEORGIA | $407,000 |
| COBB COLLABORATIVE INC | $292,000 |
| GWINNETT COALITION FOR H & H SRVS | $290,000 |
| WELLROOT FAMILY SERVICES | $250,000 |
| GREATER VALDOSTA UNITED WAY | $250,000 |
| COASTAL GEORGIA INDICATORS COALITIO | $250,000 |
| UNITED WAY OF SOUTHWEST GEORGIA | $250,000 |
| COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF EAST GEORGI | $250,000 |
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF VALDOSTA | $250,000 |
| ATHENS AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $250,000 |
| WAYCROSS AREA SHELTER FOR ABUSED | $250,000 |
| GILMER COUNTY FAMILY CONNECTION | $250,000 |
| CRISIS LINE & SAFE HOUSE OF CENTRAL | $250,000 |
| COMMUNITY FND CHATTAHOOCHEE VALLEY | $250,000 |
| GEORGIA CAMPAIGN FOR ADOLESCENT P&P | $250,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $5.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 6% of The Pittulloch Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 98% of the giving stays in GA; read by stated purpose it is 96% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +41% since the first grant, against +28% for the ones you funded once.
51 repeat relationships — 24 still active in FY2025, 27 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.5M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- RGRESILIENT GEORGIA INC7× · 2019–2025 · $2.3M · revenue +773% · 88% of their budget
- CGCOASTAL GEORGIA INDICATORS COALITION INC7× · 2019–2025 · $1.4M · revenue +107% · 60% of their budget
- ACATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC4× · 2018–2023 · $1.0M · revenue +78%
Funded once
- SHSOARING HEIGHTS COMMUNITIES INCone grant, 2023 · $250k · revenue -56%
- GCGWINNETT COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLSone grant, 2019 · $240k
- GCGSU COLLEGE OF EDUCATIONone grant, 2017 · $200k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Georgia Court Appointed Special Advocates, Inc. (the Organization) is a nonprofit organization which strengthens and supports court-sanctioned, affiliate CASA programs that empower community volunteers who advocate for abused or neglected…
To promote, assist and support the development, growth & continuation of children's advocacy centers in the state of Georgia.
Strengthen and preserve the well-being of individuals, couples, and families through easy, affordable access to professional counseling services.
Empowering south carolina communities and children's advocacy centers to deliver a best practice response to child abuse
Supporting people with special needs to lead fulfilled lives.
Georgia Center for Opportunity GCO is an independent, non-partisan think tank dedicated to increasing opportunity and improving the quality of life for all Georgians.
Creative community services (ccs) improves the quality of life for children teens and adults with developmental disabilities and mental health needs, and their families, by providing direct services and community-based support throughout…
Covenant Care Services, Inc. is a non-profit faith-based adoption agency serving birthmothers and adoptive families in the state of Georgia. The Organization counsels women experiencing unplanned pregancy and educates them about the option…
Families first strengthens family resiliency so children and families can thrive. through a prevention-based, two-generation approach, the organization provides behavioral health services, intensive navigation and case management, and…
Provides mediation services and mediation training for all manner of disputes, private and public, without the need for formal audication through the court system.
ACP is a group committed to identifying and providing leadership on selected issues important to driving the economic development of the city of Atlanta and for which the ACP's active involvement will make a major difference. The ACP has a…
Girls on the Run Georgia empowers girls with vital social-emotional skills to help them succeed in school, at home, and within friendships. Our programs, Girls on the Run (3rd-5th grade) and Heart & Sole (6th-8th grade) are taught by…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Advocates for Children Inc and the most unlike its peers is Juvenile Diabetes Cure Alliance. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 28% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 19% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
61 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 61 of the 112 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds GEORGIA CENTER FOR CHILD ADVOCACY INC ↗
- Who funds RESILIENT GEORGIA INC ↗
- Who funds Athens Area Community Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds COASTAL GEORGIA INDICATORS COALITION INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF SOUTHWEST GEORGIA INC ↗
- Who funds ATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds Cobb Collaborative Inc ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF CENTRAL GEORGIA INC ↗
- Who funds Greater Valdosta United Way Inc ↗
- Who funds UNITED METHODIST CHILDREN'S HOME OF THE NORTH GA CONFERENCE INC ↗
- Who funds CHRIS 180 INC ↗
- Who funds CHILD ENRICHMENT INC ↗
- Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds Georgia Council on Economic Education ↗
- Who funds PATH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CRISIS LINE & SAFE HOUSE OF CENTRAL GEORGIA INC ↗
- Who funds SOARING HEIGHTS COMMUNITIES INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF VALDOSTA INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF COASTAL GEORGIA INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Georgia Power Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc · Betty and Davis Fitzgerald Foundation Inc · The Zeist Foundation Inc · United Way of Greater Atlanta Inc · J Bulow Campbell Foundation · Tull Charitable Foundation Inc · Tr Uw Charles I Branan · Fraser-Parker Foundation · Georgia Health Initiative Inc · Community Foundation for Northeast Georgia · R Howard Dobbs Jr Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Pittulloch Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Pittulloch Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to The Pittulloch Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.